Kündig Patrizia, Tschan Franziska, Semmer Norbert K, Morgenthaler Camille, Zimmermann Jasmin, Holzer Eliane, Huber Simon Andreas, Hunziker Sabina, Marsch Stephan
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Mar 2;6(2):81-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395. eCollection 2020.
Teams that regularly step back from action and deliberately reflect on their performance and strategies show higher performance. Ad hoc emergency teams with changing team composition cannot develop such habits but may engage in short postaction reflection to discuss shortcomings of past performance and potential adaptations of their strategies for future similar tasks. This study aimed to test the effect of a short postaction self-led reflective team briefing on resuscitation performance in a simulator setting in terms of three performance parameters: hands-on time, coordination between chest compression and ventilation, and defibrillation.
We performed a randomised controlled trial including 56 ad hoc formed teams of three fourth-year medical students each. All groups performed a resuscitation task, followed by a self-guided reflective briefing, based on a general instruction (n=28 teams), or an unrelated discussion session (control condition; n=29), followed by a second resuscitation task in the same team composition.
Adjusted for performance in the first task, teams in the reflection condition showed higher performance gain in the second resuscitation than teams in the control condition (6.21 percentage points (95% CI 1.31 to 11.10, p<0.001)) for basic hands-on performance; 15.0 percentage points (95% CI 2 to 28, p<0.001) for coordinative performance but non-significantly lower performance for defibrillation (-9%, 95% CI -27% to -9%, p=0.312).
Even very short self-led postaction reflective briefings enhance basic resuscitation performance in ad hoc groups but may not influence more complex aspects of the task. We recommend including short self-led team debriefings as part of simulator training.
经常从行动中抽身出来,认真反思自身表现和策略的团队表现更优。人员构成不断变化的临时应急团队无法养成这样的习惯,但可能会在行动后进行简短反思,讨论过去表现中的不足以及未来类似任务中策略的潜在调整。本研究旨在通过三个绩效参数:实际操作时间、胸外按压与通气之间的协调以及除颤,测试行动后简短的自我引导式反思团队简报对模拟环境中复苏表现的影响。
我们进行了一项随机对照试验,纳入了56个由三名四年级医学生临时组成的团队。所有小组都执行了一项复苏任务,随后根据一般指导(n = 28个团队)进行自我引导式反思简报,或进行无关的讨论环节(对照条件;n = 29),之后以相同的团队构成执行第二项复苏任务。
根据第一项任务的表现进行调整后,反思组的团队在第二次复苏中的表现增益高于对照组(基本实际操作表现提高6.21个百分点(95%CI 1.31至11.10,p<0.001));协调表现提高15.0个百分点(95%CI 2至28,p<0.001),但除颤表现无显著差异且略低(-9%,95%CI -27%至-9%,p = 0.312)。
即使是非常简短的自我引导式行动后反思简报也能提高临时小组的基本复苏表现,但可能不会影响任务中更复杂的方面。我们建议将简短的自我引导式团队总结作为模拟培训的一部分。