• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不止于经验:团队成员任务后反思干预可提升面临模拟复苏任务的学生团队的表现——一项前瞻性随机试验

More than experience: a post-task reflection intervention among team members enhances performance in student teams confronted with a simulated resuscitation task-a prospective randomised trial.

作者信息

Kündig Patrizia, Tschan Franziska, Semmer Norbert K, Morgenthaler Camille, Zimmermann Jasmin, Holzer Eliane, Huber Simon Andreas, Hunziker Sabina, Marsch Stephan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.

Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Mar 2;6(2):81-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395
PMID:35516080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8936849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teams that regularly step back from action and deliberately reflect on their performance and strategies show higher performance. Ad hoc emergency teams with changing team composition cannot develop such habits but may engage in short postaction reflection to discuss shortcomings of past performance and potential adaptations of their strategies for future similar tasks. This study aimed to test the effect of a short postaction self-led reflective team briefing on resuscitation performance in a simulator setting in terms of three performance parameters: hands-on time, coordination between chest compression and ventilation, and defibrillation.

METHODS

We performed a randomised controlled trial including 56 ad hoc formed teams of three fourth-year medical students each. All groups performed a resuscitation task, followed by a self-guided reflective briefing, based on a general instruction (n=28 teams), or an unrelated discussion session (control condition; n=29), followed by a second resuscitation task in the same team composition.

RESULTS

Adjusted for performance in the first task, teams in the reflection condition showed higher performance gain in the second resuscitation than teams in the control condition (6.21 percentage points (95% CI 1.31 to 11.10, p<0.001)) for basic hands-on performance; 15.0 percentage points (95% CI 2 to 28, p<0.001) for coordinative performance but non-significantly lower performance for defibrillation (-9%, 95% CI -27% to -9%, p=0.312).

CONCLUSION

Even very short self-led postaction reflective briefings enhance basic resuscitation performance in ad hoc groups but may not influence more complex aspects of the task. We recommend including short self-led team debriefings as part of simulator training.

摘要

背景

经常从行动中抽身出来,认真反思自身表现和策略的团队表现更优。人员构成不断变化的临时应急团队无法养成这样的习惯,但可能会在行动后进行简短反思,讨论过去表现中的不足以及未来类似任务中策略的潜在调整。本研究旨在通过三个绩效参数:实际操作时间、胸外按压与通气之间的协调以及除颤,测试行动后简短的自我引导式反思团队简报对模拟环境中复苏表现的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项随机对照试验,纳入了56个由三名四年级医学生临时组成的团队。所有小组都执行了一项复苏任务,随后根据一般指导(n = 28个团队)进行自我引导式反思简报,或进行无关的讨论环节(对照条件;n = 29),之后以相同的团队构成执行第二项复苏任务。

结果

根据第一项任务的表现进行调整后,反思组的团队在第二次复苏中的表现增益高于对照组(基本实际操作表现提高6.21个百分点(95%CI 1.31至11.10,p<0.001));协调表现提高15.0个百分点(95%CI 2至28,p<0.001),但除颤表现无显著差异且略低(-9%,95%CI -27%至-9%,p = 0.312)。

结论

即使是非常简短的自我引导式行动后反思简报也能提高临时小组的基本复苏表现,但可能不会影响任务中更复杂的方面。我们建议将简短的自我引导式团队总结作为模拟培训的一部分。

相似文献

1
More than experience: a post-task reflection intervention among team members enhances performance in student teams confronted with a simulated resuscitation task-a prospective randomised trial.不止于经验:团队成员任务后反思干预可提升面临模拟复苏任务的学生团队的表现——一项前瞻性随机试验
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Mar 2;6(2):81-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000395. eCollection 2020.
2
An observational study of self-monitoring in ad hoc health care teams.临时医疗团队自我监测的观察性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02115-3.
3
Hands-on time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is affected by the process of teambuilding: a prospective randomised simulator-based trial.心肺复苏期间的实际操作时间受团队建设过程的影响:一项基于模拟人试验的前瞻性随机试验。
BMC Emerg Med. 2009 Feb 14;9:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-9-3.
4
Improved Clinical Performance and Teamwork of Pediatric Interprofessional Resuscitation Teams With a Simulation-Based Educational Intervention.基于模拟的教育干预可提高儿科跨专业复苏团队的临床绩效和团队协作能力。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):e62-e69. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001025.
5
Standards of resuscitation during inter-hospital transportation: the effects of structured team briefing or guideline review - a randomised, controlled simulation study of two micro-interventions.院际转运期间的复苏标准:结构化团队简报或指南审查的效果——两种微干预措施的随机对照模拟研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Mar 3;19:15. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-15.
6
A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams.在模拟心脏骤停期间对护理学生团队的除颤和心肺复苏表现进行比较研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Apr 2;20:23. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-23.
7
Effect of a simulation-based workshop on multidisplinary teamwork of newborn emergencies: an intervention study.基于模拟的研讨会对新生儿紧急情况多学科团队合作的影响:一项干预性研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 12;8:671. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1654-2.
8
In situ, multidisciplinary, simulation-based teamwork training improves early trauma care.现场、多学科、基于模拟的团队合作培训提高了早期创伤护理水平。
J Surg Educ. 2011 Nov-Dec;68(6):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
Simulation-based Randomized Comparative Assessment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Bundle Completion by Emergency Medical Service Teams Using Standard Life Support or an Experimental Automation-assisted Approach.基于模拟的随机对照评估:急救医疗服务团队使用标准生命支持或实验性自动化辅助方法完成院外心脏骤停复苏集束治疗的情况
Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):365-375. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000178.
10
Flipped Classroom: Improved team performance during resuscitation training through interactive pre-course content - a cluster-randomised controlled study.翻转课堂:通过交互式课前内容提高复苏培训期间的团队表现——一项整群随机对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05438-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the role of self-led debriefings within simulation-based education: time to challenge the status quo?探索自我引导式总结汇报在基于模拟的教育中的作用:是时候挑战现状了吗?
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Mar 11;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00342-6.
2
Exploring in-person self-led debriefings for groups of learners in simulation-based education: an integrative review.探索基于模拟教育的学习者群体的面对面自我引导式总结汇报:一项综合综述。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Jan 16;9(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00274-z.
3
Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network.行为科学在急症护理团队中的应用:一个欧洲研究网络的未来研究议程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10555-6.
4
StOP? II trial: cluster randomized clinical trial to test the implementation of a toolbox for structured communication in the operating room-study protocol.StOP? II 试验:整群随机临床试验,旨在测试手术室结构化沟通工具包的实施情况——研究方案
Trials. 2022 Oct 18;23(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06775-y.
5
"Disruptive behavior" in the operating room: A prospective observational study of triggers and effects of tense communication episodes in surgical teams.手术室中的“破坏性行为”:一项前瞻性观察研究,探讨手术团队中紧张沟通事件的触发因素和影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226437. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
What's the headline on your mind right now? How reflection guides simulation-based faculty development in a master class.你此刻脑海中浮现的头条新闻是什么?反思如何在大师班中指导基于模拟的教师发展。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jul 9;4(3):126-132. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000247. eCollection 2018.
2
Trauma resuscitation: can team behaviours in the prearrival period predict resuscitation performance?创伤复苏:院前阶段的团队行为能否预测复苏表现?
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Jul 6;3(3):106-110. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000143. eCollection 2017.
3
Quality of interdisciplinary postsimulation debriefing: 360° evaluation.跨学科模拟后汇报的质量:360°评估
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):9-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000125. eCollection 2017.
4
Twelve tips for integrating team reflexivity into your simulation-based team training.十二条将团队反思整合到基于模拟的团队培训中的技巧。
Med Teach. 2018 Jul;40(7):721-727. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1464135. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
5
The effects of team reflexivity on psychological well-being in manufacturing teams.团队反思对制造团队心理健康的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Apr;103(4):443-462. doi: 10.1037/apl0000279. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
Toward Best Practices for Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Mixed Methods Study.迈向手术发病率和死亡率会议的最佳实践:一项混合方法研究。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jan-Feb;75(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
7
Promoting Learning and Patient Care Through Shared Reflection: A Conceptual Framework for Team Reflexivity in Health Care.通过共享反思促进学习与患者护理:医疗保健中团队反思性的概念框架
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11):1555-1563. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001688.
8
Saving lives: A meta-analysis of team training in healthcare.拯救生命:医疗保健团队培训的荟萃分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Sep;101(9):1266-304. doi: 10.1037/apl0000120. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
9
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support.《2015年欧洲复苏委员会复苏指南:第3部分. 成人高级生命支持》
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:100-47. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.016.
10
Part 1: Executive Summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.第1部分:执行摘要:2015年心肺复苏与心血管急救科学及治疗建议国际共识。
Circulation. 2015 Oct 20;132(16 Suppl 1):S2-39. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000270.