Nobre Rony, Cardoso Rodrigo Kohn, Araujo Aline Machado, Orcy Rafael, Ribas Larissa, Catto Rafaela, Conteratto Ana Carolina, DE Aquino Jeniffer, Rombaldi Airton José, Bohlke Maristela
Postgraduate Program in Health and Behavior, Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Pelotas, BRAZIL.
Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, BRAZIL.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Mar 1;15(2):434-441. doi: 10.70252/FSCW3440. eCollection 2022.
Considering that the hemodynamic safety is a major concern about intradialytic exercise with blood flow restriction, this analysis was performed to compare the blood pressure (BP) behavior during the first two hours of hemodialysis (HD) between sessions with no exercise (control group, CG), low/moderate intensity aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction (BFRE) and conventional aerobic exercise (AE). Adult patients with chronic kidney disease on HD at a university hospital were randomly assigned and submitted to a 12-week intradialytic training with BFRE or AE compared with the CG group. The main outcomes of this report were the change in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP during HD and the frequency of low BP (LBP) and high BP (HBP) episodes. A total of 6,074 BP measurements of 58 patients were analyzed. There was a larger decrease in BP in the exercise sessions compared with the control sessions, but with a similar magnitude in the BFRE and AE groups (effect size 0.49). There was a higher number of LBP in the BFRE group. The frequency of HBP was similar between the BFRE and the CG groups and lower in the AE group. Despite a greater number of mild LBP in BFRE patients, the BP change during the first two hours of HD was similar to that of patients in AE. Intradialytic aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction does not seem to be associated with a higher hemodynamic burden than conventional aerobic exercise.
鉴于血液动力学安全性是血液透析期间进行血流受限运动的主要关注点,本分析旨在比较无运动(对照组,CG)、低/中等强度血流受限有氧运动(BFRE)和传统有氧运动(AE)的透析治疗期间前两小时的血压(BP)变化情况。大学医院中接受血液透析的成年慢性肾病患者被随机分组,并与CG组相比,接受为期12周的BFRE或AE透析内训练。本报告的主要结局指标为血液透析期间收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的变化以及低血压(LBP)和高血压(HBP)发作的频率。对58例患者的6074次血压测量进行了分析。与对照时段相比,运动时段的血压下降幅度更大,但BFRE组和AE组的下降幅度相似(效应量为0.49)。BFRE组的LBP发作次数更多。BFRE组和CG组的HBP发作频率相似,而AE组的HBP发作频率较低。尽管BFRE患者中轻度LBP发作次数较多,但血液透析前两小时的血压变化与AE患者相似。血流受限的透析内有氧运动似乎与传统有氧运动相比,不会带来更高的血液动力学负担。