Ciullo Anna, Yee Jennifer, Frey Jennifer A, Gothard M David, Benner Alma, Hammond Jared, Ballas Derek, Ahmed Rami A
Department of Emergency Medicine, Summa Health, Akron, Ohio, USA.
Department of Medical Education, Summa Health, Akron, Ohio, USA.
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Nov 29;5(1):8-14. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000254. eCollection 2019.
Mechanical ventilation is a complex topic that requires an in-depth understanding of the cardiopulmonary system, its associated pathophysiology and comprehensive knowledge of equipment capabilities.
The use of telepresent faculty to train providers in the use of mechanical ventilation using medical simulation as a teaching methodology is not well established. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of telepresent faculty versus traditional in-person instruction to teach mechanical ventilation to medical students.
Medical students for this small cohort pilot study were instructed using either in-person instruction or telementoring. Initiation and management of mechanical ventilation were reviewed. Effectiveness was evaluated by pre- and post-multiple choice tests, confidence surveys and summative simulation scenarios. Students evaluated faculty debriefing using the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare Student Version (DASH-SV).
A 3-day pilot curriculum demonstrated significant improvement in the confidence (in person P<0.001; telementoring P=0.001), knowledge (in person P<0.001; telementoring P=0.022) and performance (in person P<0.001; telementoring P<0.002) of medical students in their ability to manage a critically ill patient on mechanical ventilation. Participants favoured the in-person curriculum over telepresent education, however, resultant mean DASH-SV scores rated both approaches as consistently to extremely effective.
While in-person learners demonstrated larger confidence and knowledge gains than telementored learners, improvement was seen in both cases. Learners rated both methods to be effective. Technological issues may have contributed to students providing a more favourable rating of the in-person curriculum.
Telementoring is a viable option to provide medical education to medical students on the fundamentals of ventilator management at institutions that may not have content experts readily available.
机械通气是一个复杂的主题,需要对心肺系统、其相关病理生理学有深入了解,并具备设备功能的全面知识。
利用远程指导教员通过医学模拟作为教学方法来培训医护人员使用机械通气的做法尚未得到充分确立。本研究的目的是比较远程指导教员与传统面对面教学在向医学生教授机械通气方面的效果。
本小型队列试点研究中的医学生通过面对面教学或远程指导进行授课。回顾了机械通气的启动和管理。通过课前和课后多项选择题测试、信心调查以及总结性模拟场景来评估有效性。学生使用医疗保健学生版模拟情况汇报评估(DASH-SV)对教员的情况汇报进行评估。
为期3天的试点课程显示,医学生在管理机械通气的重症患者能力方面,信心(面对面教学P<0.001;远程指导P=0.001)、知识(面对面教学P<0.001;远程指导P=0.022)和表现(面对面教学P<0.001;远程指导P<0.002)均有显著提高。参与者更喜欢面对面课程而非远程教学,然而,最终的平均DASH-SV分数将两种教学方法都评为始终有效至极有效。
虽然面对面学习的学生在信心和知识增长方面比远程指导的学生更大,但两种情况均有进步。学习者认为两种方法都有效。技术问题可能导致学生对面对面课程给出更有利的评价。
对于那些可能没有现成内容专家的机构,远程指导是向医学生提供呼吸机管理基础知识医学教育的可行选择。