Zhang Lijun, D'Amora Ugo, Ronca Alfredo, Li Yuanyuan, Mo Xiaoying, Zhou Fei, Yuan Mingzhou, Ambrosio Luigi, Wu Jun, Raucci Maria Grazia
Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Shenzhen P. R. China
Department of Burns, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou P. R. China.
RSC Adv. 2020 Aug 28;10(53):32183-32192. doi: 10.1039/d0ra06025a. eCollection 2020 Aug 26.
Over the past few years, different and studies have been highlighting the great potentiality of hyaluronic acid (HA) as a biomaterial in wound healing treatment thanks to its good capability to induce mesenchymal and epithelial cell growth and differentiation, angiogenesis, and collagen deposition. However, the need to improve its mechanical properties as well as its residence time has led scientists to study new functionalization strategies. In this work, chemically modified HA-based hydrogels were obtained by methacrylic and maleic functionalization. Methacrylated (MEHA) and maleated HA (MAHA) hydrogels have shown important physico-chemical properties. The present study provides a deeper insight into the biocompatibility of both synthesized materials and their effects on tissue inflammation using and models. To this aim, different cell lines involved in wound healing, human dermal fibroblasts, human adipose-derived stem cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells, were seeded on MEHA and MAHA hydrogels. Furthermore, an inflammation study was carried out on a murine macrophage cell line to assess the effects of both hydrogels on inflammatory and anti-inflammatory interleukin production. The results showed that both MAHA and MEHA supported cell proliferation with anti-inflammation ability as highlighted by the increased levels of IL-10 (57.92 ± 9.87 pg mL and 68.08 ± 13.94 pg mL, for MEHA and MAHA, respectively). To investigate the inflammatory response at tissue/implant interfaces, an study was also performed by subcutaneous implantation of the materials in BALB/c mice for up to 28 days. In these analyses, no significant chronic inflammation reaction was demonstrated in either MEHA or MAHA in the long-term implantation.
在过去几年中,不同的研究一直强调透明质酸(HA)作为生物材料在伤口愈合治疗中的巨大潜力,这得益于其诱导间充质和上皮细胞生长与分化、血管生成以及胶原蛋白沉积的良好能力。然而,改善其机械性能以及停留时间的需求促使科学家研究新的功能化策略。在这项工作中,通过甲基丙烯酸和马来酸功能化获得了化学改性的基于HA的水凝胶。甲基丙烯酸化(MEHA)和马来酸化HA(MAHA)水凝胶表现出重要的物理化学性质。本研究使用[具体模型1]和[具体模型2]模型,对两种合成材料的生物相容性及其对组织炎症的影响进行了更深入的研究。为此,将参与伤口愈合的不同细胞系,即人皮肤成纤维细胞、人脂肪来源干细胞和人脐静脉内皮细胞,接种在MEHA和MAHA水凝胶上。此外,在小鼠巨噬细胞系上进行了炎症研究,以评估两种水凝胶对炎性和抗炎性白细胞介素产生的影响。结果表明,MAHA和MEHA都支持细胞增殖并具有抗炎能力,MEHA和MAHA的IL-10水平升高(分别为57.92±9.87 pg/mL和68.08±13.94 pg/mL)就突出了这一点。为了研究组织/植入物界面的炎症反应,还通过将材料皮下植入BALB/c小鼠长达28天进行了[具体研究]。在这些分析中,长期植入时MEHA或MAHA均未显示出明显的慢性炎症反应。