• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内治疗联合标准药物治疗可改善后循环卒中的预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Endovascular Treatment Combined With Standard Medical Treatment Improves Outcomes of Posterior Circulation Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Dong Shuju, Li Yanbo, Guo Jian, Luo Yaxi, Fang Jinghuan, Tang Li, He Li

机构信息

Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 19;13:694418. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.694418. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.694418
PMID:35518202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9062408/
Abstract

AIMS

Whether endovascular treatment (EVT) can further improve the prognosis of patients with posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS) is unclear. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PCIS patients treated with EVT plus standard medical treatment (SMT) and SMT alone.

METHODS

We systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to February 2022. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) with scores of 0-2 or 0-3; secondary outcomes included successful recanalization rate, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after treatment and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

We identified six studies including 1, 385 PCIS patients (957 with EVT plus SMT; 428 with SMT alone). EVT plus SMT substantially improved 90-day functional outcomes compared with SMT alone [mRS score of 0-2: RR=1.95, 95% CI (1.52 - 2.51), < 0.001; mRS score of 0-3: RR = 1.85, 95% CI (1.49 - 2.30), < 0.001, respectively]. Moreover, compared with SMT, combined treatment significantly improved the rate of successful recanalization [RR = 5.03, 95% CI (3.96-6.40), < 0.001] and reduced 90-day mortality [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.63-0.79), < 0.001] despite a higher risk of ICH [RR = 6.13, 95% CI (2.50-15.02), < 0.001] and sICH [RR = 10.47, 95% CI [2.79-39.32), = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Low-to-moderate evidence from RCTs and non-RCTs showed that increased ICH and sICH risk of EVT plus SMT did not translate to a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes compared with SMT and could even promote independence at 90 days in a real-world cohort.

摘要

目的

血管内治疗(EVT)能否进一步改善后循环缺血性卒中(PCIS)患者的预后尚不清楚。本荟萃分析旨在比较接受EVT联合标准药物治疗(SMT)与单纯SMT治疗的PCIS患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们系统检索了截至2022年2月MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中的相关随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性队列试验。主要结局是改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为0-2或0-3的良好功能结局;次要结局包括治疗后成功再通率、颅内出血(ICH)或症状性颅内出血(sICH)以及90天死亡率。

结果

我们纳入了6项研究,共1385例PCIS患者(957例接受EVT联合SMT;428例单纯接受SMT)。与单纯SMT相比,EVT联合SMT显著改善了90天功能结局[mRS评分为0-2:RR=1.95,95%CI(1.52-2.51),P<0.001;mRS评分为0-3:RR=1.85,95%CI(1.49-2.30),P<0.001]。此外,与SMT相比,联合治疗显著提高了成功再通率[RR=5.03,95%CI(3.96-6.40),P<0.001],并降低了90天死亡率[RR=0.71,95%CI(0.63-0.79),P<0.001],尽管ICH[RR=6.13,95%CI(2.50-15.02),P<0.001]和sICH[RR=10.47,95%CI(2.79-39.32),P=0.001]风险更高。

结论

来自RCT和非RCT的低至中等证据表明,与SMT相比,EVT联合SMT增加的ICH和sICH风险并未转化为不良结局的更高风险,甚至可能促进现实世界队列中90天时的独立性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/10451ca00791/fneur-13-694418-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/7aa1bf5573f8/fneur-13-694418-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/ef706eb7638b/fneur-13-694418-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/3654fadadbcd/fneur-13-694418-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/10451ca00791/fneur-13-694418-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/7aa1bf5573f8/fneur-13-694418-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/ef706eb7638b/fneur-13-694418-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/3654fadadbcd/fneur-13-694418-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a31/9062408/10451ca00791/fneur-13-694418-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Endovascular Treatment Combined With Standard Medical Treatment Improves Outcomes of Posterior Circulation Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管内治疗联合标准药物治疗可改善后循环卒中的预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 19;13:694418. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.694418. eCollection 2022.
2
Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment versus Standard Medical Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性基底动脉闭塞性缺血性卒中血管内治疗与标准药物治疗的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 10;12(20):6444. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206444.
3
Real-world safety and efficacy endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.真实世界中基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗与标准药物治疗的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;236:108096. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108096. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
4
A meta-analysis and systematic review of endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management for acute basilar artery occlusion.急性基底动脉闭塞血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗的荟萃分析和系统评价。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Nov;234:107986. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107986. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment in patients with established large infarct: a cohort study.已发生大面积梗死患者的血管内治疗与标准药物治疗的比较:一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):4775-4784. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001539.
6
Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard medical treatment for stroke patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管内血栓切除术与急性基底动脉闭塞卒中患者的标准药物治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):1173-1179. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018680. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for basilar artery occlusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗与标准药物治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Feb 3;139(3):732-740. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS222490. Print 2023 Sep 1.
8
Benefits of Endovascular Treatment in Late Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke Selected without CT Perfusion: A Real-World Study.血管内治疗在急性缺血性脑卒中晚期窗选择中没有 CT 灌注的获益:一项真实世界研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Apr 22;17:577-587. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S362119. eCollection 2022.
9
Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short- and long-term outcomes: a meta-analysis of 6 randomised control trials.血管内血栓切除术治疗大梗死、短期和长期结局的缺血性脑卒中:6 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Dec;45(12):5627-5637. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07662-x. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
10
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with endovascular therapy compared with endovascular therapy alone in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.替罗非班联合血管内治疗与单纯血管内治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的安全性和有效性的Meta 分析。
Neuroradiology. 2021 Jan;63(1):17-25. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02530-9. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneous treatment effects of Cerebrolysin as an early add-on to reperfusion therapy: analysis of the CEREHETIS trial.脑活素作为再灌注治疗早期附加治疗的异质性治疗效果:CEREHETIS试验分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 5;14:1288718. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1288718. eCollection 2023.
2
Endovascular Treatment of Basilar Artery Occlusion: What Can We Learn from the Results?基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗:我们能从结果中学到什么?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 31;59(1):96. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010096.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Intra-arterial Alteplase vs Placebo Following Successful Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke: The CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.成功取栓后动脉内注射阿替普酶与安慰剂对大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:CHOICE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 1;327(9):826-835. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1645.
2
Thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion.基底动脉闭塞取栓术。
Int J Stroke. 2022 Oct;17(9):1006-1012. doi: 10.1177/17474930211069859. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
3
Endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion.
急性基底动脉闭塞性缺血性脑卒中的血管内治疗联合或不联合静脉内阿替普酶治疗。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2022 Jun;7(3):190-199. doi: 10.1136/svn-2021-001242. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
Comparison of Risk Factors, Safety, and Efficacy Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Posterior vs. Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.后循环与前循环大血管闭塞机械取栓的危险因素、安全性及疗效结果比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 22;12:687134. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.687134. eCollection 2021.
5
Endovascular thrombectomy and intra-arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke.血管内血栓切除术和急性缺血性脑卒中的动脉内介入治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 14;6(6):CD007574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007574.pub3.
6
First-line contact aspiration versus first-line stent retriever for acute posterior circulation strokes: an updated meta-analysis.急性后循环卒中一线接触抽吸术与一线取栓支架治疗的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 May;14(5). doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017497. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion.基底动脉闭塞性卒中的血管内治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1910-1920. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2030297.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Thrombectomy for Primary Distal Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The TOPMOST Study.急性基底动脉远端闭塞性卒中血管内治疗:TOPMOST 研究
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):434-444. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0001.
10
Endovascular treatment for basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jun;28(6):2106-2110. doi: 10.1111/ene.14751. Epub 2021 Feb 12.