Navarro-Mantas Laura, de Lemus Soledad, García-Sánchez Efraín, McGill Lucy, Hansen Nina, Megías Jesús L
Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre, University of Granada (CIMCYC-UGR), Granada, Spain.
Department of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 19;13:867945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867945. eCollection 2022.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects thousands of women around the world and is prevalent in the Global South. Unequal social structures perpetuate hierarchies and maintain women's vulnerability to violence. Difficulties women face in accessing education, economic resources, and employment diminish their power in intimate relationships, increasing the likelihood of IPV. These factors can also have a significant effect on women's mental health. However, some studies show that economic empowerment does not necessarily translate into greater agency for women if they cannot use the resources they earn to pursue whatever goals or values they regard as important in life. Agency is women's ability to identify their life goals and act upon them through critical evaluation (intrinsic agency) and autonomous decision-making (instrumental agency). In this article, we aim to analyze the relationship between women's power (educational and economic) and agency and their influence on intimate partner violence and on women's mental health in the context of El Salvador. Currently, El Salvador has one of the highest percentages of femicide worldwide. We used data from the first national survey on violence against women in El Salvador to determine empowerment indicators and investigated their influence on intimate partner violence and women's mental health. Results from a representative sample of 1,274 women aged between 15 and 64 years old and, using a structural equation modeling revealed that education was a protective factor against IPV, but economic power appeared to put women at greater risk of IPV. Education was positively related to both intrinsic and instrumental agency, but only instrumental agency was negatively associated with the likelihood of being a victim of IPV. Finally, both intrinsic and instrumental agencies were positively related to women's mental health. We discuss the importance of identifying specific factors related to women's power and agency to prevent IPV and mental health problems and to promote more gender equity in the Global South.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)影响着全球成千上万的女性,在全球南方地区普遍存在。不平等的社会结构使等级制度长期存在,并使女性易受暴力侵害。女性在获得教育、经济资源和就业方面面临的困难削弱了她们在亲密关系中的权力,增加了亲密伴侣暴力发生的可能性。这些因素也会对女性的心理健康产生重大影响。然而,一些研究表明,如果女性无法利用她们赚取的资源来追求她们认为生活中重要的任何目标或价值观,经济赋权并不一定会转化为更大的自主权。自主权是指女性识别自己的生活目标并通过批判性评估(内在自主权)和自主决策(工具性自主权)来实现这些目标的能力。在本文中,我们旨在分析萨尔瓦多背景下女性的权力(教育和经济)与自主权之间的关系,以及它们对亲密伴侣暴力和女性心理健康的影响。目前,萨尔瓦多是全球女性杀人率最高的国家之一。我们使用了萨尔瓦多第一次全国性女性暴力调查的数据来确定赋权指标,并研究它们对亲密伴侣暴力和女性心理健康的影响。对1274名年龄在15至64岁之间的女性进行的代表性抽样结果,并使用结构方程模型显示,教育是预防亲密伴侣暴力的保护因素,但经济权力似乎使女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的风险更大。教育与内在自主权和工具性自主权均呈正相关,但只有工具性自主权与成为亲密伴侣暴力受害者的可能性呈负相关。最后,内在自主权和工具性自主权均与女性的心理健康呈正相关。我们讨论了识别与女性权力和自主权相关的具体因素对于预防亲密伴侣暴力和心理健康问题以及在全球南方促进更多性别平等的重要性。