Morozova Gala, Martindale Amanda, Richards Hugh, Stirling John, Currie Ian
Institute of Sport, P.E., & Health Sciences, Moray House School of Education and Sport, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
NORS Workforce Transformation Programme Lead, NHS Blood and Transplant, Watford, UK.
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 May 21;7(2):86-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000558. eCollection 2021.
The National Organ Retrieval Service (NORS) 2015 review recommended a Joint Scrub Practitioner for abdominal and cardiac teams during combined organ retrieval. To evaluate the feasibility of this role, and to understand the functional implications, this study explores the use of simulation and provides a novel and comprehensive approach to assess individual and team performance in simulated multiorgan retrievals.
Two high-fidelity simulations were conducted in an operating theatre with porcine organs, en bloc, placed in a mannequin. For donation after brainstem death (DBD) simulation, an anaesthetic machine provided simulated physiological output. Retrievals following donation after circulatory death (DCD) began with rapid arrival in theatre of the mannequin. Cardiothoracic (lead surgeon) and abdominal (lead and assistant surgeons; joint scrub practitioner, n=9) teams combined for the retrievals. Data collected before, during and after simulations used self-report and expert observers to assess: attitudinal expectations, mental readiness, mental effort, non-technical skills, teamwork, task workload and social validation perceptions.
Attitudinal changes regarding feasibility of a joint scrub practitioner for DBD and DCD are displayed in the main body. There were no significant differences in mental readiness prior to simulations nor in mental effort indicated afterwards; however, variance was noted between simulations for individual team members. Non-technical skills were slightly lower in DCD than in DBD. Global ratings of teamwork were significantly (p<0.05) lower in DCD than in DBD. Measures of attitude indicated less support for the proposed joint scrub practitioner role for DCD than for DBD.
The paper posits that the joint scrub practitioner role in DCD multiorgan retrieval may bring serious and unanticipated challenges. Further work to determine the feasibility of the NORS recommendation is required. Measures of team performance and individual psychological response can inform organ retrieval feasibility considerations nationally and internationally.
国家器官获取服务机构(NORS)2015年的评估报告建议,在联合器官获取过程中,为腹部和心脏团队配备一名联合刷手护士。为评估这一角色的可行性,并了解其功能影响,本研究探索了模拟方法的应用,并提供了一种新颖且全面的方法来评估模拟多器官获取过程中的个人和团队表现。
在手术室中使用猪器官进行了两次高保真模拟,将器官整体放置在人体模型中。对于脑死亡后器官捐献(DBD)模拟,麻醉机提供模拟生理输出。循环死亡后器官捐献(DCD)后的获取工作从人体模型迅速抵达手术室开始。心胸外科(主刀医生)和腹部外科(主刀和助手医生;联合刷手护士,n = 9)团队联合进行获取工作。在模拟之前、期间和之后收集的数据使用自我报告和专家观察来评估:态度期望、心理准备、心理努力、非技术技能、团队合作、任务工作量和社会认可度。
关于联合刷手护士在DBD和DCD中可行性的态度变化在正文部分展示。模拟前的心理准备和模拟后表明的心理努力方面没有显著差异;然而,各个团队成员在不同模拟之间存在差异。DCD中的非技术技能略低于DBD。DCD中团队合作的总体评分显著低于DBD(p < 0.05)。态度测量表明,与DBD相比,对提议的联合刷手护士在DCD中的角色支持较少。
本文认为联合刷手护士在DCD多器官获取中的角色可能带来严重且意想不到的挑战。需要进一步开展工作来确定NORS建议的可行性。团队表现和个人心理反应的测量可以为国内和国际器官获取可行性考量提供参考。