• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Real-Time Risk Tool for Pharmacy Interventions.用于药学干预的实时风险工具。
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Feb;57(1):52-60. doi: 10.1177/0018578720973884. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effectiveness of a computerized drug-monitoring program to detect and prevent adverse drug events and medication non-adherence in outpatient ambulatory care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.计算机化药物监测程序在门诊非卧床护理中检测和预防药物不良事件及用药依从性的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jan 8;16:2. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-2.
4
Effect of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Intervention on Adverse Drug Events: A Cluster Randomized Trial.电子药物重整干预对药物不良事件的影响:一项群组随机试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10756.
5
A Time and Motion Study of Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians Obtaining Admission Medication Histories.药剂师和药房技术员获取入院用药史的时间与动作研究。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):180-183. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2702.
6
Evaluation of a multidisciplinary approach to reduce internal medicine readmissions using a readmission prediction index.运用再入院预测指数评价多学科方法对减少内科再入院率的效果。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Jun 4;77(12):950-957. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa078.
7
Assessing the impact of adding pharmacist management services to an existing discharge planning program on 30-day readmissions.评估在现有出院计划项目中增加药剂师管理服务对 30 天再入院率的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 May-Jun;62(3):734-739. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
8
Using pharmacy technicians and telepharmacy to obtain medication histories in the emergency department.在急诊科使用药剂师和远程药学服务获取用药史。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 May-Jun;59(3):390-397. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
Improving care transitions through medication therapy management: A community partnership to reduce readmissions in multiple health-systems.通过药物治疗管理改善护理交接:一个社区伙伴关系,以减少多个医疗系统的再入院率。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 May-Jun;59(3):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
10
Implementing a clinical pharmacy survey of adverse drug events in a French emergency department.在法国急诊科实施药物不良反应临床药学调查。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Dec;34(6):902-10. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9691-6. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for medication-related short-term readmissions in adults - a scoping review.成人药物相关性短期再入院的风险因素:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10028-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Polypharmacy in elderly cancer patients: Challenges and the way clinical pharmacists can contribute in resource-limited settings.老年癌症患者的多重用药:挑战以及临床药师在资源有限环境中可做出贡献的方式。
Aging Med (Milton). 2019 Feb 14;2(1):42-49. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12051. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Effect of clinical pharmacist encounters in the transitional care clinic on 30-day re-admissions: A retrospective study.过渡护理诊所中临床药师会诊对30天再入院率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
AIMS Public Health. 2019 Sep 24;6(3):345-354. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.3.345. eCollection 2019.
3
Effects of a multifaceted medication reconciliation quality improvement intervention on patient safety: final results of the MARQUIS study.多方面药物重整质量改进干预对患者安全的影响:MARQUIS 研究的最终结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):954-964. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008233. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
4
Effects of a pharmacist-driven intervention program on hospital readmissions.药剂师主导的干预项目对医院再入院情况的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 May 1;75(9):e221-e230. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170287.
5
Do Combined Pharmacist and Prescriber Efforts on Medication Reconciliation Reduce Postdischarge Patient Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Readmissions?药师和医生共同努力进行药物重整能否减少出院后患者的急诊就诊和再住院?
J Hosp Med. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):152-157. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2857. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
An evaluation of exact matching and propensity score methods as applied in a comparative effectiveness study of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.吸入性糖皮质激素治疗哮喘的比较效果研究中应用的精确匹配和倾向评分方法的评估。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2017 Mar 22;8:15-30. doi: 10.2147/POR.S122563. eCollection 2017.
7
US Emergency Department Visits for Outpatient Adverse Drug Events, 2013-2014.2013 - 2014年美国急诊科门诊不良药物事件就诊情况
JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2115-2125. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16201.
8
Impact of pharmacist involvement in the transitional care of high-risk patients through medication reconciliation, medication education, and postdischarge call-backs (IPITCH Study).药剂师通过药物重整、用药教育和出院后回访参与高危患者过渡性护理的影响(IPITCH研究)
J Hosp Med. 2016 Jan;11(1):39-44. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2493. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
9
Impact of admission medication reconciliation performed by clinical pharmacists on medication safety.临床药师进行入院药物重整对用药安全的影响。
Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Nov;25(9):808-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
10
Allocating scarce resources in real-time to reduce heart failure readmissions: a prospective, controlled study.实时分配稀缺资源以减少心力衰竭再入院:一项前瞻性、对照研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec;22(12):998-1005. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001901. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

用于药学干预的实时风险工具。

Real-Time Risk Tool for Pharmacy Interventions.

作者信息

Nguyen Hanh L, Alvarez Kristin S, Manz Boryana, Nethi Arun, Sharma Varun, Sundaram Venkatraghavan, Julka Manjula

机构信息

Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, USA.

Parkland Center for Clinical Innovation, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Hosp Pharm. 2022 Feb;57(1):52-60. doi: 10.1177/0018578720973884. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1177/0018578720973884
PMID:35521024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9065517/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug events (ADEs) result in excess hospitalizations. Thorough admission medication histories (AMHs) may prevent ADEs; however, the resources required oftentimes outweigh what is available in large hospital settings. Previous risk prediction models embedded into the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) have been used at hospitals to aid in targeting delivery of scarce resources.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if an AMH scoring tool used to allocate resources can decrease 30-day hospital readmissions.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Propensity-matched cohort study, Medicine/Surgery patients in large academic safety-net hospital.

INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE

Pharmacy-conducted AMHs identified by risk model versus standard of care AMH.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A total of 30-day hospital readmissions and inpatient ADE prevention.

RESULTS

The model screened 87 240 hospitalizations between June 2017 and June 2019 and 4027 patients per group were included. There were significantly less 30 day readmissions among high-risk identified patients that received a pharmacy-conducted AMH compared to controls (11% vs 15%;  = 0.004) and no significant difference in readmission rates for low-risk patients. While there was significantly higher documentation of major ADE prevention in the pharmacy-led AMH group versus control (1656 vs 12;  < 0.001), there was no difference in electronically-detected inpatient ADEs between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A risk tool embedded into the EMR can be used to identify patients whom pharmacy teams can easily target for AMHs. This study showed significant reductions in readmissions for patients identified as high-risk. However, the same benefit in readmissions was not seen in those identified at low-risk, which supports allocating resources to those that will benefit the most.

摘要

背景

药物不良事件(ADEs)导致住院人数过多。全面的入院用药史(AMHs)可能预防ADEs;然而,所需资源往往超过大型医院环境中的可用资源。以前嵌入电子病历(EMR)的风险预测模型已在医院中用于帮助确定稀缺资源的分配目标。

目的

确定用于分配资源的AMH评分工具是否可以降低30天内的医院再入院率。

设计、设置和参与者:倾向匹配队列研究,大型学术安全网医院的内科/外科患者。

干预或暴露

通过风险模型识别的药房进行的AMHs与护理标准AMH。

主要结局和测量指标

总共30天的医院再入院率和住院期间ADE的预防情况。

结果

该模型在2017年6月至2019年6月期间筛选了87240例住院病例,每组纳入4027例患者。与对照组相比,接受药房进行的AMH的高危识别患者的30天再入院率显著降低(11%对15%;P = 0.004),低危患者的再入院率无显著差异。虽然药房主导的AMH组与对照组相比,主要ADE预防的记录显著更高(1656对12;P < 0.001),但两组之间电子检测到的住院ADEs没有差异。

结论

嵌入EMR的风险工具可用于识别药房团队可以轻松针对其进行AMHs的患者。这项研究表明,被确定为高危的患者的再入院率显著降低。然而,在被确定为低危的患者中没有看到相同的再入院益处,这支持将资源分配给最受益的患者。