Suppr超能文献

第八章 COVID-19:盲目应用“最陡曲线”的危险

Chapitre 8. COVID-19: the danger of blindly applying the "steepest curve".

出版信息

J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci. 2022 Mar 9;Vol. 32(4):151-153. doi: 10.3917/jibes.324.0151.

Abstract

Drawing lessons from the first wave of Covid-19, and the management of the pandemic by the French health authorities, this article questions the “steepest curve” argument –an argument that consists, in a situation of radical uncertainty, and by “precaution”, in systematically projecting the worst-case scenario. But, is this rationale of anticipating the worst that might happen pertinent for dealing with crises? This is not what practices teach us, by which gentler slopes, “average” slopes, discovered day by day in the light of experience, have emerged. This article therefore aims to defend another paradigm in the management of uncertainty: that of a phronesis, a prudence guided by practices.

摘要

借鉴第一波新冠疫情和法国卫生当局对疫情的管理经验,本文对“最陡峭曲线”这一论点提出质疑——在极度不确定的情况下,通过“预防”措施,系统地预测最坏情况。但是,这种预先设想可能发生的最坏情况的基本原理是否适用于应对危机呢?实践经验告诉我们,并非如此,我们逐渐发现了更为缓和的“平均”坡度。因此,本文旨在为不确定性管理提供另一种模式:实践导向的实践智慧。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验