Roest B, Leget C
Department of Care Ethics, University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Death Stud. 2023;47(3):315-327. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2022.2065554. Epub 2022 May 6.
Most research on physician-assisted dying (PAD) in the Netherlands focuses on general practitioners (GPs). Less is known about the perspectives of other professionals. We performed narrative interviews with 10 professionals other than GPs to explore their perspectives on PAD in primary care. The results provide insight into PAD as an enacted practice involving many different actors, considerations, and expectations and into the intertwinement between PAD and palliative sedation. The study shows how a multidisciplinary perspective to PAD provides new avenues for practice, research, and ethics. It poses the question whether PAD can and should be considered merely a physicians' concern.
荷兰大多数关于医生协助死亡(PAD)的研究都集中在全科医生(GP)身上。对于其他专业人员的观点了解较少。我们对10名全科医生以外的专业人员进行了叙事访谈,以探讨他们对初级保健中医生协助死亡的看法。研究结果揭示了医生协助死亡作为一种涉及众多不同行为者、考量因素和期望的既定做法,以及医生协助死亡与姑息性镇静之间的交织情况。该研究表明,对医生协助死亡采取多学科视角如何为实践、研究和伦理提供新途径。它提出了一个问题,即医生协助死亡是否能够且应该仅仅被视为医生的关注点。