• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国 COVID-19 大流行初期重症监护病房医疗专业人员的经历和协商:扎根理论研究。

Intensive Care Units Healthcare Professionals' Experiences and Negotiations at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Grounded Theory Study.

机构信息

61074Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.

210419University of Regensburg, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Sociology, Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221081059. doi: 10.1177/00469580221081059.

DOI:10.1177/00469580221081059
PMID:35522185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9082755/
Abstract

Faced with the pandemic of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), healthcare professionals (HCPs) in intensive care units (ICU) adjusted their organizational, operational, and personal procedures to ensure care for COVID-19 patients. We used grounded theory approach to explore ICU HCPs' perspectives on professional action at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany from March to July 2020. The study aimed to examine implicit principles on negotiating social practice and interaction of ICU HCPs in an exceptional situation, which was characterized by a high level of changes. We conducted theme-guided qualitative telephone/virtual interviews with 39 ICU HCPs from ten German federal states. The data collection followed the principles of theoretical sampling. We adpoted grounded theory approach proposed by Charmaz and discussed using Lüscher's theoretical concept of ambivalence. The analysis revealed five interconnected categories about the ICU HCPs' negotiation of social practice and interaction at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. In this context, a complex field of ambivalence (key category) emerged between habits and routines of a pre-pandemic normality. Pragmatic restructuring processes were initiated, which quickly resulted in a new normality of a "daily routine of preparation". Dealing with ambivalence offers the potential for change.

摘要

面对新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的大流行,重症监护病房(ICU)的医疗保健专业人员调整了他们的组织、操作和个人程序,以确保对 COVID-19 患者的护理。我们使用扎根理论方法,从 2020 年 3 月至 7 月,在德国探讨了 COVID-19 大流行初期 ICU 医护人员对专业行动的看法。该研究旨在探讨在以高度变化为特征的特殊情况下,ICU 医护人员在协商社会实践和互动方面的隐含原则。我们对来自德国十个联邦州的 39 名 ICU 医护人员进行了主题引导的定性电话/虚拟访谈。数据收集遵循理论抽样原则。我们采用 Charmaz 提出的扎根理论方法,并讨论了 Lüscher 的关于矛盾心理的理论概念。分析揭示了在德国 COVID-19 大流行初期 ICU 医护人员在协商社会实践和互动方面的五个相互关联的类别。在这种情况下,在大流行前的常态的习惯和常规之间出现了一个复杂的矛盾心理领域(关键类别)。实用的重构过程被启动,这很快导致了“日常准备”的新常态。应对矛盾心理提供了变革的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7b/9082755/99c5736521d5/10.1177_00469580221081059-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7b/9082755/99c5736521d5/10.1177_00469580221081059-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7b/9082755/99c5736521d5/10.1177_00469580221081059-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Intensive Care Units Healthcare Professionals' Experiences and Negotiations at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Grounded Theory Study.德国 COVID-19 大流行初期重症监护病房医疗专业人员的经历和协商:扎根理论研究。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221081059. doi: 10.1177/00469580221081059.
2
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of impacts of the Covid-19-pandemic on outpatient care in rural areas: a qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对新冠疫情对农村地区门诊护理影响的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 2;21(1):1298. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07261-y.
3
The impact of the intensive care unit family liaison nurse role on communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.重症监护病房家庭联络护士角色对 COVID-19 大流行期间沟通的影响:医护人员观点的定性描述研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Jan;36(1):127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
Healthcare professionals' experiences during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study.医护人员在重症监护病房经历的 COVID-19 大流行初期:一项定性研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Feb;68:103130. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103130. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
5
Psychosocial, emotional and professional challenges faced by female healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 outbreak in Lahore, Pakistan: a qualitative study.巴基斯坦拉合尔市 COVID-19 疫情期间女性医护人员面临的社会心理、情绪和职业挑战:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 12;21(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01344-y.
6
Psychological distress of frontline healthcare workers in the intensive care unit during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study from China.新冠肺炎疫情早期 ICU 一线医护人员的心理困扰:来自中国的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e049627. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049627.
7
Telephone consulting for 'Personalised Care and Support Planning' with people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences during COVID-19 restrictions and beyond.电话咨询“个性化护理和支持计划”在长期病患者中的应用:一项在 COVID-19 限制期间及之后,针对医疗保健专业人员的经验的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 31;25(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02443-z.
8
Experiences of Health-Care Professionals Who Served the Migrant Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Singapore and Its Impact on Morale: A Brief Report.在新加坡 COVID-19 大流行期间服务于农民工的医疗保健专业人员的经历及其对士气的影响:简要报告。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2024 Sep 18;18:e125. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2024.119.
9
Healthcare professionals in COVID-19-intensive care units in Norway: preparedness and working conditions: a cohort study.挪威 COVID-19 重症监护病房的医护人员:准备情况和工作条件:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e049135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049135.
10
'Who will do it if I don't?' Nurse anaesthetists' experiences of working in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic.'如果我不做,谁来做呢?'——COVID-19 大流行期间,麻醉护士在重症监护病房工作的经历。
Aust Crit Care. 2022 Jan;35(1):52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 crisis management of German ICU clinicians in leadership - a metaphor analysis.德国 ICU 临床医生在领导力下的 COVID-19 危机管理-隐喻分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 8;11:1160094. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1160094. eCollection 2023.
2
Occupational Well-Being of Multidisciplinary PHC Teams: Barriers/Facilitators and Negotiations to Improve Working Conditions.多学科初级卫生保健团队的职业幸福感:改善工作条件的障碍/促进因素和协商。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;19(23):15943. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315943.
3
Conducting rapid qualitative interview research during the COVID-19 pandemic-Reflections on methodological choices.

本文引用的文献

1
'Who will do it if I don't?' Nurse anaesthetists' experiences of working in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic.'如果我不做,谁来做呢?'——COVID-19 大流行期间,麻醉护士在重症监护病房工作的经历。
Aust Crit Care. 2022 Jan;35(1):52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
2
Experiences of frontline healthcare workers and their views about support during COVID-19 and previous pandemics: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.一线医护人员在 COVID-19 疫情及以往大流行期间的经历及其对支持的看法:系统评价和定性荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06917-z.
3
在新冠疫情期间开展快速定性访谈研究——关于方法选择的思考
Front Sociol. 2022 Aug 11;7:953872. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.953872. eCollection 2022.
4
[Joint interpretation work in qualitative health research in times of "physical distancing"].["身体距离”时期定性健康研究中的联合解读工作]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Aug;172:49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 May 13.
An Introduction to Qualitative Inquiry.
定性研究入门。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jun 1;32(6):1275-1278. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021040473. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
A qualitative study of physician perceptions and experiences of caring for critically ill patients in the context of resource strain during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.一项关于在新冠疫情第一波期间资源紧张情况下医生对重症患者护理的认知与经历的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 22;21(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06393-5.
5
Overcoming the challenge of COVID-19: A grounded theory approach to rural nurses' experiences.克服新冠疫情的挑战:一种基于扎根理论的农村护士经历研究方法
J Gen Fam Med. 2020 Nov 29;22(3):134-140. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.410. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Lessons from Italian front-line nurses' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study.新冠疫情期间意大利一线护士的经验教训:一项质性描述性研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Apr;29(3):404-411. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13194. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
7
Professional Quality of Life and Mental Health Outcomes among Health Care Workers Exposed to Sars-Cov-2 (Covid-19).暴露于 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)的医护人员的职业生活质量和精神健康结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;17(17):6180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176180.
8
COVID-19 in Critical Care Units: Rethinking the Humanization of Nursing Care.重症监护病房中的新冠肺炎:对护理人性化的重新思考。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;39(5):239-241. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000438.
9
The Psychological Impact of Epidemic and Pandemic Outbreaks on Healthcare Workers: Rapid Review of the Evidence.疫情对医护人员的心理影响:证据快速综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Jul 10;22(8):43. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01166-z.
10
Psychosocial burden of healthcare professionals in times of COVID-19 - a survey conducted at the University Hospital Augsburg.COVID-19 时期医护人员的心理社会负担——奥格斯堡大学医院开展的一项调查
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Jun 22;18:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/000281. eCollection 2020.