61074Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
210419University of Regensburg, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Sociology, Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany.
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221081059. doi: 10.1177/00469580221081059.
Faced with the pandemic of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), healthcare professionals (HCPs) in intensive care units (ICU) adjusted their organizational, operational, and personal procedures to ensure care for COVID-19 patients. We used grounded theory approach to explore ICU HCPs' perspectives on professional action at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany from March to July 2020. The study aimed to examine implicit principles on negotiating social practice and interaction of ICU HCPs in an exceptional situation, which was characterized by a high level of changes. We conducted theme-guided qualitative telephone/virtual interviews with 39 ICU HCPs from ten German federal states. The data collection followed the principles of theoretical sampling. We adpoted grounded theory approach proposed by Charmaz and discussed using Lüscher's theoretical concept of ambivalence. The analysis revealed five interconnected categories about the ICU HCPs' negotiation of social practice and interaction at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. In this context, a complex field of ambivalence (key category) emerged between habits and routines of a pre-pandemic normality. Pragmatic restructuring processes were initiated, which quickly resulted in a new normality of a "daily routine of preparation". Dealing with ambivalence offers the potential for change.
面对新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的大流行,重症监护病房(ICU)的医疗保健专业人员调整了他们的组织、操作和个人程序,以确保对 COVID-19 患者的护理。我们使用扎根理论方法,从 2020 年 3 月至 7 月,在德国探讨了 COVID-19 大流行初期 ICU 医护人员对专业行动的看法。该研究旨在探讨在以高度变化为特征的特殊情况下,ICU 医护人员在协商社会实践和互动方面的隐含原则。我们对来自德国十个联邦州的 39 名 ICU 医护人员进行了主题引导的定性电话/虚拟访谈。数据收集遵循理论抽样原则。我们采用 Charmaz 提出的扎根理论方法,并讨论了 Lüscher 的关于矛盾心理的理论概念。分析揭示了在德国 COVID-19 大流行初期 ICU 医护人员在协商社会实践和互动方面的五个相互关联的类别。在这种情况下,在大流行前的常态的习惯和常规之间出现了一个复杂的矛盾心理领域(关键类别)。实用的重构过程被启动,这很快导致了“日常准备”的新常态。应对矛盾心理提供了变革的潜力。