Mirada Medical Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Phys Med Biol. 2022 Jun 13;67(12). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac6d9c.
Semi-automatic and fully automatic contouring tools have emerged as an alternative to fully manual segmentation to reduce time spent contouring and to increase contour quality and consistency. Particularly, fully automatic segmentation has seen exceptional improvements through the use of deep learning in recent years. These fully automatic methods may not require user interactions, but the resulting contours are often not suitable to be used in clinical practice without a review by the clinician. Furthermore, they need large amounts of labelled data to be available for training. This review presents alternatives to manual or fully automatic segmentation methods along the spectrum of variable user interactivity and data availability. The challenge lies to determine how much user interaction is necessary and how this user interaction can be used most effectively. While deep learning is already widely used for fully automatic tools, interactive methods are just at the starting point to be transformed by it. Interaction between clinician and machine, via artificial intelligence, can go both ways and this review will present the avenues that are being pursued to improve medical image segmentation.
半自动和全自动轮廓勾画工具已经作为一种替代完全手动分割的方法出现,以减少勾画时间并提高轮廓的质量和一致性。特别是,近年来深度学习的应用使得全自动分割取得了非凡的进展。这些全自动方法可能不需要用户交互,但生成的轮廓通常需要临床医生进行审查后才能在临床实践中使用。此外,它们需要大量可用的标记数据进行训练。本综述介绍了沿着用户交互和数据可用性变化范围的手动或全自动分割方法的替代方案。挑战在于确定需要多少用户交互以及如何最有效地利用这种用户交互。虽然深度学习已经广泛用于全自动工具,但交互式方法才刚刚开始受到其影响。通过人工智能,临床医生和机器之间的交互可以是双向的,本综述将介绍正在探索的改善医学图像分割的途径。