Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;61(11):1362-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 May 3.
Depression and low socioeconomic status have both been associated with hippocampal volume alterations. Whether these factors interact to predict neurobehavioral outcomes has not been adequately studied. The authors investigated family income as a moderator of the relationship between depression and hippocampal volume in a longitudinal sample.
Longitudinal behavioral data, beginning at preschool age, and behavioral and neuroimaging data from school age to adolescence were used to assess the impact of preschool only and total preschool to adolescent depression symptoms on hippocampal volumes using family income as a moderator (N = 176).
Depression severity during the preschool period interacted with family income to predict hippocampal volumes at the intercept (ie, age 13 years; B = -0.078, p = .003). Interaction decomposition revealed that only individuals with relatively high family income exhibited smaller hippocampal volume with increasing depression severity (B = -0.146, p = .005). Family income was associated with hippocampus volumes only in individuals with low to moderate preschool depression severity (B = 0.289, p = .007 and B = 0.169, p = .030, respectively).
Preschool depression severity interacts with family income to predict hippocampal volume across development, such that the effects of early depression are evident only in those with higher income. These findings suggest that hippocampal volume may not be an effective marker of risk for depression at different levels of socioeconomic status, and emphasizes the importance of the environmental context when assessing risk markers for depression. Future research should explore how socioeconomic stress may eclipse the effects of depression on hippocampal development, setting alternative neurodevelopmental risk trajectories.
抑郁和低社会经济地位都与海马体积改变有关。这些因素是否相互作用以预测神经行为结果尚未得到充分研究。作者研究了家庭收入作为抑郁与海马体积之间关系的调节因素在纵向样本中的作用。
使用纵向行为数据,从学前年龄开始,以及从学龄期到青春期的行为和神经影像学数据,使用家庭收入作为调节因素(N=176)评估仅在学前和整个学前至青春期抑郁症状对海马体积的影响。
学前期间的抑郁严重程度与家庭收入相互作用,预测 13 岁时的海马体积(即 intercept;B=-0.078,p=0.003)。交互作用分解表明,只有家庭收入相对较高的个体随着抑郁严重程度的增加,海马体积较小(B=-0.146,p=0.005)。家庭收入仅与低至中度学前抑郁严重程度的个体的海马体积相关(B=0.289,p=0.007 和 B=0.169,p=0.030)。
学前抑郁严重程度与家庭收入相互作用,预测整个发育过程中的海马体积,表明早期抑郁的影响仅在收入较高的个体中明显。这些发现表明,海马体积可能不是不同社会经济地位下抑郁风险的有效标志物,并强调了在评估抑郁风险标志物时环境背景的重要性。未来的研究应探讨社会经济压力如何掩盖抑郁对海马发育的影响,从而确定替代的神经发育风险轨迹。