Suppr超能文献

拔牙后使用抗生素预防感染的效果如何?一项网状荟萃分析。

Do antibiotics prevent infection after third molar surgery? A network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Section, Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil.

Oral and Maxillofacial Section, Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep;51(9):1226-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 5.

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether antibiotics, compared to placebo, can prevent infection or dry socket after third molar surgery. A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed following registration of the protocol (CRD42021276266). Four databases and the grey literature were searched, and papers were selected based on the PICOS question. RoB 2 and GRADE were used to evaluate the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence, respectively. The NMA was performed using Stata. Of 58 randomized clinical trials identified, 34 were included in the NMA. Patients treated with amoxicillin (relative risk (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.84; low quality of evidence) and those treated with metronidazole (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.84; low quality of evidence) showed a lower risk of infection and dry socket when compared to patients given a placebo. Postoperative amoxicillin (750 mg) and amoxicillin plus clavulanate (500 mg + 125 mg, or 2000 mg + 125 mg), and preoperative metronidazole (800 mg) are useful to prevent infection or dry socket when compared to placebo. The low rate of infection after third molar surgery, the correct concept of antibiotic prophylaxis, and antibiotic resistance must be taken into account when choosing to treat healthy patients undergoing third molar surgery with antibiotics.

摘要

本系统评价的目的是确定与安慰剂相比,抗生素能否预防第三磨牙手术后的感染或干槽症。在注册方案(CRD42021276266)后,进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。通过四个数据库和灰色文献进行检索,并根据 PICOS 问题选择论文。使用 RoB 2 和 GRADE 分别评估偏倚风险和证据确定性。使用 Stata 进行 NMA。在确定的 58 项随机临床试验中,有 34 项被纳入 NMA。与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受阿莫西林(相对风险(RR)0.56,95%置信区间(CI)0.38-0.84;低质量证据)和甲硝唑(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.31-0.84;低质量证据)治疗的患者感染和干槽症的风险较低。与安慰剂相比,术后给予阿莫西林(750mg)和阿莫西林加克拉维酸(500mg+125mg 或 2000mg+125mg),以及术前给予甲硝唑(800mg)可有效预防感染或干槽症。在选择用抗生素治疗接受第三磨牙手术的健康患者时,必须考虑到第三磨牙手术后感染率低、抗生素预防的正确概念和抗生素耐药性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验