Ballmann Cora, Kölle Markus Alexander, Bekavac-Günther Ines, Wolf Florian, Pargent Florian, Barzel Anne, Philipsen Alexandra, Gensichen Jochen
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 22;13:858147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858147. eCollection 2022.
Adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is common, but often undiagnosed. A valid and time-efficient screening tool for primary care is needed. Objective of this study is to evaluate the German version of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale for DSM-5 (ASRS-5) and its feasibility, acceptability, and reliability as a screening tool for adult ADHD in primary care. A multi-centered prospective, diagnostic study was performed. We recruited 262 patients in primary care practices and at an ADHD Outpatient Service of a department of psychiatry in Germany. Patients from 18 to 65 years with suspected or diagnosed ADHD were included by medical doctors, as well as non-ADHD patients as "negative controls." Participants filled in the ASRS-5 and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The Integrated Diagnosis of Adult ADHD, revised version (IDA-R) performed by trained interviewers was used for validation. Feasibility, acceptability, and credibility in primary care practices were examined through a semi-structured interview. The German version of the ASRS-5 showed comparable psychometric properties to the English original version (sensitivity 95.6% and specificity 72.3%). For factor structure, a parallel analysis suggested one latent dimension. Performing confirmatory factor analysis, the best fit was achieved for a general factor with one correlated error. Internal consistency results in Raykovs Omega = 0.86 and Cronbach's = 0.88. The ASRS-5 was assessed positively in terms of feasibility, acceptability, and credibility by interviewed general practitioners. Potential problems were raised for "treatment options," "stigmatization," and "knowledge gaps." In conclusion, the German version of the ASRS-5 offers a promising tool to improve adult ADHD patients' diagnosis and healthcare.
成人注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)很常见,但往往未被诊断出来。基层医疗需要一种有效且省时的筛查工具。本研究的目的是评估《成人ADHD自我报告量表(DSM-5)》(ASRS-5)德文版作为基层医疗中成人ADHD筛查工具的可行性、可接受性和可靠性。开展了一项多中心前瞻性诊断研究。我们在德国的基层医疗诊所和一家精神病科的ADHD门诊服务机构招募了262名患者。18至65岁疑似或确诊患有ADHD的患者由医生纳入研究,同时纳入非ADHD患者作为“阴性对照”。参与者填写了ASRS-5和一份社会人口学问卷。由经过培训的访谈者进行的成人ADHD综合诊断修订版(IDA-R)用于验证。通过半结构化访谈检查基层医疗实践中的可行性、可接受性和可信度。ASRS-5德文版显示出与英文原版相当的心理测量特性(敏感性95.6%,特异性72.3%)。对于因子结构,平行分析表明存在一个潜在维度。进行验证性因子分析时,一个具有一个相关误差的一般因子拟合最佳。内部一致性结果为Raykovs欧米伽系数=0.86,克朗巴哈系数=0.88。接受访谈的全科医生对ASRS-5在可行性、可接受性和可信度方面给予了积极评价。对于“治疗选择”“污名化”和“知识差距”提出了潜在问题。总之,ASRS-5德文版为改善成人ADHD患者的诊断和医疗保健提供了一个有前景的工具。