Suppr超能文献

含和不含霍乱毒素B亚单位的全灭活霍乱弧菌口服疫苗对人类的保护效力。

Protective efficacy in humans of killed whole-vibrio oral cholera vaccine with and without the B subunit of cholera toxin.

作者信息

Black R E, Levine M M, Clements M L, Young C R, Svennerholm A M, Holmgren J

出版信息

Infect Immun. 1987 May;55(5):1116-20. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.5.1116-1120.1987.

Abstract

Natural protection from cholera is associated with local intestinal antibacterial and antitoxic antibodies, which appear to act synergistically. Although current parenteral cholera vaccines offer insufficient protection, new vaccines administered orally have more promise. Killed Vibrio cholerae, alone or given with the B subunit of cholera toxin, was evaluated in adult volunteers. Vaccinees, who received three doses of either vaccine, and unvaccinated controls ingested 10(6) V. cholerae organisms to determine the protective efficacy of the vaccines. The combination vaccine provided 64% protection, and the whole vibrio vaccine given alone provided 56% protection. In addition, illnesses in vaccines were milder than those in controls, and both vaccines gave complete protection against more severe disease. This substantial level of protection against a dose of V. cholerae that caused cholera in nearly 90% of controls suggests that these vaccines might provide at least as high a level of protection if given to the population of an endemic area. Indeed, a field efficacy trial is underway in Bangladesh, and preliminary data indicate a protective efficacy of 85% for a killed whole vibrio plus B subunit vaccine similar to that tested in volunteers and an efficacy of 58% for the killed whole vibrio vaccine alone. Thus, the studies in human volunteers were successful in predicting the substantial protection afforded by the vaccines in a cholera endemic area.

摘要

对霍乱的天然保护与局部肠道抗菌和抗毒素抗体有关,这些抗体似乎具有协同作用。尽管目前的肠道外霍乱疫苗提供的保护不足,但口服的新型疫苗更有前景。在成年志愿者中评估了灭活的霍乱弧菌,单独使用或与霍乱毒素B亚基联合使用。接受三剂任何一种疫苗的接种者和未接种疫苗的对照组摄入10(6)个霍乱弧菌以确定疫苗的保护效力。联合疫苗提供了64%的保护,单独使用的全弧菌疫苗提供了56%的保护。此外,接种疫苗者的疾病比对照组的更轻,两种疫苗都对更严重的疾病提供了完全保护。对几乎90%的对照组引发霍乱的一定剂量霍乱弧菌有如此高的保护水平表明,如果给流行地区的人群接种这些疫苗,它们可能提供至少同样高的保护水平。事实上,在孟加拉国正在进行一项现场效力试验,初步数据表明,一种类似于在志愿者中测试的灭活全弧菌加B亚基疫苗的保护效力为85%,单独的灭活全弧菌疫苗的效力为58%。因此,在人类志愿者中进行的研究成功地预测了疫苗在霍乱流行地区提供的显著保护。

相似文献

4
Field trial of oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh.孟加拉国口服霍乱疫苗现场试验
Lancet. 1986 Jul 19;2(8499):124-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91944-6.

引用本文的文献

3
Controlled Human Infection Models To Accelerate Vaccine Development.控制人体感染模型以加速疫苗开发。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022 Sep 21;35(3):e0000821. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00008-21. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Human Challenge Studies for Cholera.人类霍乱挑战研究。
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2024;445:177-188. doi: 10.1007/82_2022_258.
6
Oral Cholera Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness.口服霍乱疫苗的效力和效果
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Dec 15;9(12):1482. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9121482.
7
Modern History of Cholera Vaccines and the Pivotal Role of icddr,b.霍乱疫苗的现代史与 icddr,b 的关键作用
J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 20;224(12 Suppl 2):S742-S748. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab423.
8
The Interface of and the Gut Microbiome.和肠道微生物组的界面。
Gut Microbes. 2021 Jan-Dec;13(1):1937015. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1937015.

本文引用的文献

1
Duration of infection-derived immunity to cholera.霍乱感染后免疫的持续时间。
J Infect Dis. 1981 Jun;143(6):818-20. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.6.818.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验