Lange Aurelie M C, Humayun Sajid, Jefford Tom
Family Psychology Mutual CIC, Huntingdon, UK.
School of Human Science, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Child Youth Care Forum. 2023;52(2):441-466. doi: 10.1007/s10566-022-09692-y. Epub 2022 May 2.
Due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic, mental health care has largely transferred its services to online platforms, using videoconferencing (VC) or teletherapy. Within the field of family therapy, however, there is little evidence on the feasibility of using VC, especially when working with whole families at the edge of care.
This study investigated the feasibility of remote Functional Family Therapy (FFT), using a mixed-method approach.
Study 1 consisted of semi-structured interviews with 23 FFT professionals (18 female) about their experience of providing remote FFT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 2 included monitoring data of 209 FFT clients (46% female, = 14.00) who participated in FFT during the pandemic. We compared families who received mainly in-person, mainly remote or a mix of remote and in-person on client-reported alliance, drop-out, therapist-rated outcomes, and treatment intensity using MANCOVA's and chi-square tests.
In Study 1 two themes emerged around experienced challenges, namely 'Feeling in control' and 'Engagement and alliance'. Two other themes emerged around adaptations, namely 'Being more on top' and 'Connecting in different ways'. In Study 2, we found that the therapeutic alliance was not related to using VC. Also, families had less between-session contact during the Engagement and Motivation Phase when receiving mainly VC, but had more sessions and longer therapy when receiving a mix of in-person and remote therapy.
The current study suggests that providing systemic family teletherapy to families on the edge of care is feasible. Further development of systemic family teletherapy is warranted.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10566-022-09692-y.
由于近期的新冠疫情,心理保健服务已大量转移至在线平台,采用视频会议(VC)或远程治疗。然而,在家庭治疗领域,关于使用VC的可行性证据很少,尤其是在为处于治疗边缘的整个家庭提供服务时。
本研究采用混合方法调查了远程功能家庭治疗(FFT)的可行性。
研究1包括对23名FFT专业人员(18名女性)进行半结构化访谈,了解他们在新冠疫情期间提供远程FFT的经验。研究2包括对209名在疫情期间参与FFT的FFT客户(46%为女性,平均年龄 = 14.00岁)的监测数据。我们使用多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA)和卡方检验,比较了主要接受面对面治疗、主要接受远程治疗或远程与面对面混合治疗的家庭在客户报告的联盟、退出率、治疗师评定的结果和治疗强度方面的差异。
在研究1中,围绕所经历的挑战出现了两个主题,即“感觉掌控”和“参与度与联盟”。围绕调整出现了另外两个主题,即“更占优势”和“以不同方式建立联系”。在研究2中,我们发现治疗联盟与使用VC无关。此外,在参与和动机阶段,主要接受VC治疗的家庭在疗程之间的联系较少,但接受面对面和远程混合治疗的家庭疗程更多,治疗时间更长。
当前研究表明,为处于治疗边缘的家庭提供系统性家庭远程治疗是可行的。系统性家庭远程治疗值得进一步发展。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10566-022-09692-y获取的补充材料。