• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定脑膜瘤临床研究的“核心结局集”(COSMIC 项目):两项系统文献综述、eDelphi 调查和在线共识会议的方案。

Development of 'Core Outcome Sets' for Meningioma in Clinical Studies (The COSMIC Project): protocol for two systematic literature reviews, eDelphi surveys and online consensus meetings.

机构信息

Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e057384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057384.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057384
PMID:35534067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9086638/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumour in adults. The majority are non-malignant, but a proportion behave more aggressively. Incidental/minimally symptomatic meningioma are often managed by serial imaging. Symptomatic meningioma, those that threaten neurovascular structures, or demonstrate radiological growth, are usually resected as first-line management strategy. For patients in poor clinical condition, or with inoperable, residual or recurrent disease, radiotherapy is often used as primary or adjuvant treatment. Effective pharmacotherapy treatments do not currently exist. There is heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported in meningioma clinical studies. Two 'Core Outcome Sets' (COS) will be developed: (COSMIC: Intervention) for use in meningioma clinical effectiveness trials and (COSMIC: Observation) for use in clinical studies of incidental/untreated meningioma.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Two systematic literature reviews and trial registry searches will identify outcomes measured and reported in published and ongoing (1) meningioma clinical effectiveness trials, and (2) clinical studies of incidental/untreated meningioma. Outcomes include those that are clinician reported, patient reported, caregiver reported and based on objective tests (eg, neurocognitive tests), as well as measures of progression and survival. Outcomes will be deduplicated and categorised to generate two long lists. The two long lists will be prioritised through two, two-round, international, modified eDelphi surveys including patients with meningioma, healthcare professionals, researchers and those in caring/supporting roles. The two final COS will be ratified through two 1-day online consensus meetings, with representation from all stakeholder groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Institutional review board (University of Liverpool) approval was obtained for the conduct of this study. Participant eConsent will be obtained prior to participation in the eDelphi surveys and consensus meetings. The two systematic literature reviews and two final COS will be published and freely available.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

COMET study ID 1508.

摘要

简介

脑膜瘤是成年人中最常见的原发性颅内肿瘤。大多数为良性,但有一部分表现出侵袭性。偶然发现/症状轻微的脑膜瘤通常通过连续影像学检查进行管理。有症状的脑膜瘤,即那些威胁到神经血管结构或影像学上有生长的脑膜瘤,通常作为一线治疗策略进行切除。对于临床状况较差的患者,或无法手术、残留或复发的患者,通常使用放射治疗作为一线或辅助治疗。目前尚无有效的药物治疗方法。脑膜瘤临床研究中测量和报告的结果存在异质性。将制定两个“核心结局集”(COS):(COSMIC:干预)用于脑膜瘤临床疗效试验,(COSMIC:观察)用于偶然发现/未治疗的脑膜瘤的临床研究。

方法和分析

两项系统文献回顾和试验登记搜索将确定已发表和正在进行的(1)脑膜瘤临床疗效试验,以及(2)偶然发现/未治疗脑膜瘤的临床研究中测量和报告的结局。结局包括临床医生报告的、患者报告的、照顾者报告的和基于客观测试(如神经认知测试)的结局,以及进展和生存的测量。结局将进行去重和分类,以生成两个长列表。通过两项两轮国际修改后的 eDelphi 调查,对两个长列表进行优先级排序,调查对象包括脑膜瘤患者、医疗保健专业人员、研究人员以及照顾/支持角色的人员。通过两次为期一天的在线共识会议,对两个最终的 COS 进行批准,所有利益相关者群体都有代表参加。

伦理和传播

本研究的进行已获得(英国)利物浦大学伦理委员会的批准。参与者将在参加 eDelphi 调查和共识会议之前获得电子同意书。两项系统文献回顾和两项最终的 COS 将发表并免费提供。

试验注册号

COMET 研究 ID 1508。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b11/9086638/d7ed5ecea7aa/bmjopen-2021-057384f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b11/9086638/d7ed5ecea7aa/bmjopen-2021-057384f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b11/9086638/d7ed5ecea7aa/bmjopen-2021-057384f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of 'Core Outcome Sets' for Meningioma in Clinical Studies (The COSMIC Project): protocol for two systematic literature reviews, eDelphi surveys and online consensus meetings.制定脑膜瘤临床研究的“核心结局集”(COSMIC 项目):两项系统文献综述、eDelphi 调查和在线共识会议的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e057384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057384.
2
Development of a Core outcome set for fetal Myelomeningocele (COSMiC): study protocol.制定胎儿脊髓脊膜膨出核心结局集(COSMiC):研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Aug 21;21(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04668-6.
3
Protocol for the development of a core domain set for hidradenitis suppurativa trial outcomes.用于开发化脓性汗腺炎试验结局核心领域集的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e014733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014733.
4
A core domain set for pyoderma gangrenosum trial outcomes: an international eDelphi and consensus study from the UPGRADE initiative.原发性坏疽性脓皮病试验结局的核心领域集:来自 UPGRADE 计划的国际 eDelphi 和共识研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Feb 16;190(3):392-401. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad420.
5
What should be measured and reported in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis? A study protocol for establishing a core outcome set.在治疗急性胰腺炎患者的临床试验中应测量和报告哪些内容?建立核心结局集的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e075859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075859.
6
Core outcome research measures in anal cancer (CORMAC): protocol for systematic review, qualitative interviews and Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in anal cancer.肛门癌核心结局研究指标(CORMAC):关于制定肛门癌核心结局集的系统评价、定性访谈和德尔菲调查方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e018726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018726.
7
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set and reporting guidelines for locoregional treatment in neoadjuvant systemic breast cancer treatment trials: the PRECEDENT project.局部区域新辅助全身治疗乳腺癌临床试验结局核心集制定和报告指南的制定方案:PRECEDENT 项目。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 19;14(4):e084488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084488.
8
Development of a core outcome set for multimorbidity trials in low/middle-income countries (COSMOS): study protocol.制定用于中低收入国家多病种试验的核心结局集(COSMOS):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e051810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051810.
9
Developing a core outcome set for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes-a study protocol.制定孕前糖尿病孕妇治疗的核心结局集:研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Dec 11;21(1):1017. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04910-1.
10
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study.骨盆带疼痛核心结局集制定方案,包括结局测量方法:PGP-COS 研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0624-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurocognitive evaluation in patients with intracranial Meningiomas: A systematic review.颅内脑膜瘤患者的神经认知评估:一项系统综述。
Brain Spine. 2025 Aug 6;5:104383. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104383. eCollection 2025.
2
Core Outcome Sets for Meningioma In Clinical studies (COSMIC): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies.脑膜瘤临床研究核心结局集(COSMIC):一项针对研究的国际患者和医疗保健专业人员共识。
Neurooncol Pract. 2025 Feb 20;12(4):700-713. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaf023. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Opportunities and challenges for the development of "core outcome sets" in neuro-oncology.神经肿瘤学中“核心结局集”发展的机遇与挑战。
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;24(7):1048-1055. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac062.
2
Trabectedin for recurrent WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma: A randomized phase II study of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group (EORTC-1320-BTG).替莫唑胺治疗复发性世界卫生组织 2 级或 3 级脑膜瘤:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织脑肿瘤组(EORTC-1320-BTG)的一项随机 2 期研究。
Neuro Oncol. 2022 May 4;24(5):755-767. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab243.
3
The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.
中枢神经系统世界卫生组织2级和3级脑膜瘤的健康相关生活质量结果:一项系统综述。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Feb 27;48(1):268. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03420-5.
4
How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.健康科学领域的德尔菲研究如何达成共识:一项范围综述
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 14;14(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02738-3.
5
Meningioma: International Consortium on Meningiomas consensus review on scientific advances and treatment paradigms for clinicians, researchers, and patients.脑膜瘤:脑膜瘤国际联合会关于临床医生、研究人员和患者的科学进展和治疗模式的共识综述。
Neuro Oncol. 2024 Oct 3;26(10):1742-1780. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae082.
6
The outcomes measured and reported in intracranial meningioma clinical trials: A systematic review.颅内脑膜瘤临床试验中测量和报告的结果:一项系统评价。
Neurooncol Adv. 2024 Mar 2;6(1):vdae030. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae030. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
The outcomes measured and reported in observational studies of incidental and untreated intracranial meningioma: A systematic review.偶然发现和未经治疗的颅内脑膜瘤观察性研究中测量和报告的结果:一项系统综述。
Neurooncol Adv. 2024 Mar 19;6(1):vdae042. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae042. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Grading meningioma resections: the Simpson classification and beyond.脑膜瘤切除术分级:辛普森分类法及其他方法。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jan 23;166(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-05910-9.
9
Surgery in octogenarians with intracranial meningiomas improves functional outcome at 1 year.80 岁以上颅内脑膜瘤患者的手术可改善 1 年后的功能预后。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Dec;165(12):4183-4189. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05827-9. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
10
Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study.制定用于成人原发性胶质瘤 III 期干预性试验的核心结局集:一项混合方法研究。
Neurooncol Adv. 2023 Aug 2;5(1):vdad096. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad096. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2021 年世卫组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类:概述。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
4
EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas.EANO 指南:脑膜瘤的诊断与管理。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Nov 2;23(11):1821-1834. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013-2017.美国 2013-2017 年诊断的原发性脑和其他中枢神经系统肿瘤 CBTRUS 统计报告。
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;22(12 Suppl 2):iv1-iv96. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa200.
7
"Vicarious thinking" was a key driver of score change in Delphi surveys for COS development and is facilitated by feedback of results.“替代性思考”是 COS 开发德尔菲调查中分数变化的关键驱动因素,结果反馈促进了这一思考。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;128:118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.028. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Response changes in Delphi processes: why is it important to provide high-quality feedback to Delphi participants?德尔菲法流程中的反馈变化:为何向德尔菲法参与者提供高质量反馈很重要?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:160-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.029. Epub 2020 May 13.
9
Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability.不同评分量表在德尔菲研究中的比较:不同的量表导致不同的共识,并显示出不同的重测信度。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0912-8.
10
A prospective study of the natural history of incidental meningioma-Hold your horses!一项关于偶然发现的脑膜瘤自然病史的前瞻性研究——别急!
Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Dec;6(6):438-450. doi: 10.1093/nop/npz011. Epub 2019 Apr 17.