• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加纳国家健康保险计划下电子理赔处理的成本效益分析。

Benefit-cost analysis of electronic claims processing under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e054757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054757.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054757
PMID:35534071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9086605/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit-cost of E-claims. A benefit-cost analysis was used to evaluate the efficiency of E-claims from the perspective of the providers and the purchaser.

DESIGN

A benefit-cost analysis approach was taken for this economic evaluation. Furthermore, we estimated the incremental benefit-cost ratio (IBCR) of the intervention under assessment.

PARTICIPANTS

Purchasers and healthcare providers of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) of Ghana were the study population.

RESULTS

The analysis was stratified according to providers and purchaser. Cost incurred in processing claims electronically and manually were estimated by assessing the resource use and their corresponding costs. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the results to variations in discount rate and proportions of claims processed under E-claims compared with paper claims. The combined sample of providers and purchaser made incremental gains from processing claims electronically. The IBCR was -19.75, 25.56 and 5.10 for all (sample) providers, purchaser and both providers and purchaser, respectively. When projected for the 330 facilities submitting claims to the NHIS claims processing centre (CPC) as at December 2014, the IBCR were -35.20, 25.56 and 90.06 for all providers, purchaser and both providers and purchaser. The results were sensitive to the discount rate used and proportions of E-claims compared with paper claims.

CONCLUSION

Electronic processing of claims is more efficient compared with manual processing, hence provide an economic case for scaling it up to cover many more healthcare facilities and NHIS CPCs in the Ghana.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估电子理赔的效益成本。采用效益成本分析方法,从提供者和购买者的角度评估电子理赔的效率。

设计

本经济评估采用效益成本分析方法,并估算评估干预措施的增量效益成本比(IBCR)。

参与者

加纳国家健康保险计划(NHIS)的购买者和医疗保健提供者为研究人群。

结果

根据提供者和购买者进行了分析。通过评估资源使用情况及其相应成本,估算了电子和手动理赔处理过程中的成本。进行敏感性分析,以评估结果对贴现率和电子理赔与纸质理赔处理比例变化的稳健性。提供者和购买者的综合样本通过电子处理理赔获得了增量收益。对于所有(样本)提供者、购买者以及提供者和购买者,IBCR 分别为-19.75、25.56 和 5.10。当根据截至 2014 年 12 月向 NHIS 理赔处理中心(CPC)提交理赔的 330 家医疗机构进行预测时,IBCR 分别为所有提供者、购买者和提供者和购买者的-35.20、25.56 和 90.06。结果对使用的贴现率和电子理赔与纸质理赔的比例敏感。

结论

与手动处理相比,电子理赔处理更有效率,因此有经济理由将其扩展到更多的医疗保健机构和加纳的 NHIS CPC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9792/9086605/879a841370ce/bmjopen-2021-054757f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9792/9086605/879a841370ce/bmjopen-2021-054757f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9792/9086605/879a841370ce/bmjopen-2021-054757f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Benefit-cost analysis of electronic claims processing under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.加纳国家健康保险计划下电子理赔处理的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e054757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054757.
2
Reducing medical claims cost to Ghana's National Health Insurance scheme: a cross-sectional comparative assessment of the paper- and electronic-based claims reviews.降低加纳国家医疗保险计划的医疗理赔成本:基于纸质和电子理赔审核的横断面比较评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2054-1.
3
Challenges in provider payment under the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme: a case study of claims management in two districts.加纳国家健康保险计划下医疗服务提供者支付面临的挑战:以两个地区的理赔管理为例
Ghana Med J. 2012 Dec;46(4):189-99.
4
How does it affect service delivery under the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana? Health providers and insurance managers perspective on submission and reimbursement of claims.它如何影响加纳国家健康保险计划下的服务提供?卫生提供者和保险管理人员对理赔提交和报销的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 2;16(3):e0247397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247397. eCollection 2021.
5
Value and Service Quality Assessment of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: Evidence from Ashiedu Keteke District.加纳国家健康保险计划的价值与服务质量评估:来自阿希埃杜·凯泰克区的证据
Value Health Reg Issues. 2016 Sep;10:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 May 19.
6
Strategic Health Purchasing Progress Mapping: A Spotlight on Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.战略卫生采购进展绘图:聚焦加纳国家健康保险计划。
Health Syst Reform. 2022 Mar 1;8(2):e2058337. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2022.2058337.
7
Perspectives of frontline health workers on Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme before and after community engagement interventions.社区参与干预措施前后一线卫生工作者对加纳国家医疗保险计划的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 28;16:192. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1438-y.
8
Subscribers' perception of quality of services provided by Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme - what are the correlates?加纳国家医疗保险计划的订阅者对所提供服务质量的认知——相关因素有哪些?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4023-3.
9
Is value-based payment for healthcare feasible under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme?基于价值的医疗保健支付在加纳国家健康保险计划下是否可行?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00794-y.
10
Does Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme provide financial protection to tuberculosis patients and their households?加纳国家健康保险计划是否为结核病患者及其家庭提供财务保障?
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113875. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113875. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to the implementation of an improved Community Health Fund electronic claim process in primary healthcare services in Singida region of Tanzania: a qualitative inquiry.坦桑尼亚辛吉达地区初级医疗服务中改进社区卫生基金电子索赔流程实施的障碍:一项定性调查
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 9;15(6):e090489. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090489.
2
Patterns and Mitigation Strategies for Rejected Claims Among Health Facilities Providing Services for the National Health Insurance Fund in Mwanza, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚姆万扎为国家健康保险基金提供服务的医疗机构中拒付索赔的模式及缓解策略
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 4;13(3):320. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030320.

本文引用的文献

1
Provider preference for payment method under a national health insurance scheme: A survey of health insurance-credentialed health care providers in Ghana.在国家健康保险计划下,提供者对支付方式的偏好:加纳获得健康保险认证的医疗保健提供者的调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221195. eCollection 2019.
2
Reducing medical claims cost to Ghana's National Health Insurance scheme: a cross-sectional comparative assessment of the paper- and electronic-based claims reviews.降低加纳国家医疗保险计划的医疗理赔成本:基于纸质和电子理赔审核的横断面比较评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2054-1.
3
The International Decision Support Initiative Reference Case for Economic Evaluation: An Aid to Thought.
国际经济评估决策支持倡议参考案例:思想助力
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):921-928. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.015.
4
A Review of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: What Are the Sustainability Threats and Prospects?加纳国家健康保险计划综述:可持续性面临哪些威胁与前景?
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0165151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165151. eCollection 2016.
5
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.《健康与医疗领域成本效益分析的实施、方法学实践和报告推荐:第二版》。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195.
6
Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: provider payment and service supply behaviour and incentives in the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme--a systems approach.推进系统思维在卫生领域的应用:加纳国家健康保险计划中的提供者支付、服务供应行为及激励措施——一种系统方法
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 5;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-35.
7
Effects of consumer and provider moral hazard at a municipal hospital out-patient department on Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.加纳一家市级医院门诊部的消费者和提供者道德风险对加纳国家医疗保险计划的影响。
Ghana Med J. 2012 Dec;46(4):200-10.
8
Challenges in provider payment under the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme: a case study of claims management in two districts.加纳国家健康保险计划下医疗服务提供者支付面临的挑战:以两个地区的理赔管理为例
Ghana Med J. 2012 Dec;46(4):189-99.
9
Sustainability of recurrent expenditure on public social welfare programmes: expenditure analysis of the free maternal care programme of the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme.公共社会福利项目经常性支出的可持续性:加纳国家健康保险计划免费孕产妇护理项目的支出分析
Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):271-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
10
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.