• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坦桑尼亚辛吉达地区初级医疗服务中改进社区卫生基金电子索赔流程实施的障碍:一项定性调查

Barriers to the implementation of an improved Community Health Fund electronic claim process in primary healthcare services in Singida region of Tanzania: a qualitative inquiry.

作者信息

Anaeli Amani, Peter Massawe Norberth, Mwakafwila Furaha J, Tungu Malale

机构信息

Department of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.

School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 9;15(6):e090489. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090489.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090489
PMID:40490369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12161399/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the barriers to the implementation of the improved Community Health Fund (iCHF) electronic-claim (e-claim) process in primary healthcare services in Tanzania.

DESIGN

A phenomenological study design using a qualitative approach.

SETTING

In-depth interviews were conducted to collect data from 19 participants from Mkalama and Iramba districts.

PARTICIPANTS

The data were collected from the regional health managers, district health managers, information technology officers, facility in-charges and iCHF focal persons from dispensaries, health centres and hospitals. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data in this study.

RESULTS

This study identified several key barriers to the implementation of the iCHF e-claim process. The barriers include financial governance and oversight, institutional capacity for the iCHF e-claim process, staff negligence in complying with iCHF guidelines, resource availability, and logistical shortcomings for handling iCHF e-claim processes.

CONCLUSION

The iCHF e-claim process is inadequately implemented and does not attract healthcare workers due to the observed challenges. There is a need for joint efforts to improve the implementation of the iCHF e-claim process involving stakeholders at all levels.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在探讨坦桑尼亚初级卫生保健服务中改进后的社区卫生基金(iCHF)电子索赔流程实施的障碍。

设计

采用定性方法的现象学研究设计。

背景

通过深入访谈从姆卡拉马和伊兰巴地区的19名参与者收集数据。

参与者

数据收集自区域卫生管理人员、地区卫生管理人员、信息技术官员、机构负责人以及来自药房、健康中心和医院的iCHF协调人。本研究采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

本研究确定了iCHF电子索赔流程实施的几个关键障碍。这些障碍包括财务治理与监督、iCHF电子索赔流程的机构能力、工作人员在遵守iCHF指南方面的疏忽、资源可用性以及处理iCHF电子索赔流程的后勤缺陷。

结论

由于观察到的挑战,iCHF电子索赔流程实施不力,无法吸引医护人员。需要各级利益相关者共同努力,以改善iCHF电子索赔流程的实施。

相似文献

1
Barriers to the implementation of an improved Community Health Fund electronic claim process in primary healthcare services in Singida region of Tanzania: a qualitative inquiry.坦桑尼亚辛吉达地区初级医疗服务中改进社区卫生基金电子索赔流程实施的障碍:一项定性调查
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 9;15(6):e090489. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090489.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
4
Rapid molecular tests for tuberculosis and tuberculosis drug resistance: a qualitative evidence synthesis of recipient and provider views.快速分子检测结核分枝杆菌和结核分枝杆菌耐药性:受检者和提供者观点的定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD014877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014877.pub2.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
7
Barriers and facilitators to accessing stroke care services in Tanzania: an explorative qualitative study among stroke survivors, caregivers and healthcare providers.坦桑尼亚获得中风护理服务的障碍与促进因素:一项针对中风幸存者、护理人员及医疗服务提供者的探索性定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13026-8.
8
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
9
Adjustmentalisation - digitalisation as transformation process and the interplay between a digital logic and diverse primary care logics in Sweden.调整数字化——作为转型过程的数字化以及瑞典数字逻辑与多种初级保健逻辑之间的相互作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 25;39(5):744-763. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2024-0281.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.

本文引用的文献

1
From pilot to national roll-out of the improved Community Health Fund (iCHF) in Tanzania: lessons learnt and way forward.从坦桑尼亚试点到改进型社区卫生基金(iCHF)的全国推广:经验教训与未来方向。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Nov 12;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00571-y.
2
Developing the improved Community Health Fund in Tanzania: was it a fair process?坦桑尼亚改善社区卫生基金的发展:这是一个公平的过程吗?
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i83-i95. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad067.
3
Linking the Community Health Fund with Accredited Drug Dispensing Outlets in Tanzania: exploring potentials, pitfalls, and modalities.
将坦桑尼亚的社区卫生基金与经认可的药品零售点相联系:探索潜力、问题与模式。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Dec 29;15(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00507-y.
4
Willingness to pay for a National Health Insurance Scheme in The Gambia: a contingent valuation study.冈比亚国民健康保险计划支付意愿的意愿调查研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Jan 6;38(1):61-73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac089.
5
Assessment of Strategic Healthcare Purchasing Arrangements and Functions Towards Universal Coverage in Tanzania.评估坦桑尼亚战略医疗采购安排和功能对全民覆盖的影响。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):3079-3089. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6234. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
Factors Associated with the Implementation of an Improved Community Health Fund in the Ubungo Municipality Area, Dar es Salaam Region, Tanzania.与坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆地区乌邦戈市改进社区健康基金实施相关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 5;19(9):5606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095606.
7
Benefit-cost analysis of electronic claims processing under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.加纳国家健康保险计划下电子理赔处理的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e054757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054757.
8
Governance factors that affect the implementation of health financing reforms in Tanzania: an exploratory study of stakeholders' perspectives.影响坦桑尼亚卫生筹资改革实施的治理因素:利益攸关方观点的探索性研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Aug;6(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005964.
9
The failure of community-based health insurance schemes in Tanzania: opening the black box of the implementation process.坦桑尼亚社区医疗保险计划失败:打开实施过程的黑箱。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06643-6.
10
How does it affect service delivery under the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana? Health providers and insurance managers perspective on submission and reimbursement of claims.它如何影响加纳国家健康保险计划下的服务提供?卫生提供者和保险管理人员对理赔提交和报销的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 2;16(3):e0247397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247397. eCollection 2021.