Maroto-Izquierdo Sergio, Martín-Rivera Fernando, Nosaka Kazunori, Beato Marco, González-Gallego Javier, de Paz José A
i+HeATLH, European University Miguel de Cervantes (UEMC), Valladolid, Spain.
Research Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 28;14:1176835. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1176835. eCollection 2023.
Eccentric-overload (EO) resistance training emerges as an alternative to more optimally prescribe intensity relative to the force generation capabilities of the eccentric muscle contraction. Given the difficulties to individually prescribe absolute eccentric loads relative to each person's eccentric ability, setting the load relative to the concentric one-repetition maximum (1-RM) is the most used EO training approach. Therefore, we investigated the effects of submaximal and supramaximal (i.e., eccentric loads above 100% of 1-RM) accentuated eccentric training on changes in lean mass, anabolic hormonal responses and muscle function. Physically active university students ( = 27) were randomly assigned to two training groups. Participants in the training groups performed dominant leg isotonic training twice a week for 10 weeks (four sets of eight repetitions). Isotonic resistance was generated by an electric-motor device at two different percentages of 1-RM for the eccentric phase; 90% submaximal load, SUB group) and 120% (supramaximal load, SUPRA group). Concentric load was the same for both groups (30% of 1-RM). Changes in total thigh lean mass (TTLM), anabolic hormonal responses (growth hormone, IGF-1, IL-6, and total testosterone), unilateral leg-press 1-RM, maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC), local muscle endurance (XRM), muscle power at 40 (PP40), 60 (PP60) and 80% (PP80) of the 1-RM, and unilateral vertical jump height before and after training were compared between groups. After training, both SUB and SUPRA groups showed similar increases ( < 0.05) in MVIC (19.2% and 19.6%), XRM (53.8% and 23.8%), PP40 (16.2% and 15.7%), TTLM (2.5% and 4.2%), IGF-1 (10.0% and 14.1%) and IL-6 (58.6% and 28.6%). However, increases in 1-RM strength (16.3%) and unilateral vertical jump height (10.0%-13.4%) were observed for SUPRA only. Indeed, SUPRA was shown to be more favorable than SUB training for increasing 1-RM [ES = 0.77 (1.49-0.05)]. Unilateral muscle power at medium and high intensity (10.2% and 10.5%) also increased in SUB but without significant differences between groups. Similar functional and structural effects were demonstrated after 10 weeks EO training with submaximal and supramaximal eccentric loads. Although supramaximal loading might be superior for increasing 1-RM, the use of this approach does not appear to be necessary in healthy, active individuals.
相对于离心肌肉收缩的力量产生能力,离心超负荷(EO)抗阻训练成为一种更优化规定强度的替代方法。鉴于难以根据每个人的离心能力单独规定绝对离心负荷,相对于向心一次重复最大值(1-RM)来设定负荷是最常用的EO训练方法。因此,我们研究了次最大负荷和超最大负荷(即离心负荷高于1-RM的100%)强化离心训练对瘦体重变化、合成代谢激素反应和肌肉功能的影响。身体活跃的大学生(n = 27)被随机分为两个训练组。训练组的参与者每周进行两次优势腿等张训练,持续10周(四组,每组八次重复)。等张阻力由电动装置在离心阶段以1-RM的两种不同百分比产生;90%次最大负荷(SUB组)和120%(超最大负荷,SUPRA组)。两组的向心负荷相同(1-RM的30%)。比较两组训练前后大腿总瘦体重(TTLM)、合成代谢激素反应(生长激素、IGF-1、IL-6和总睾酮)、单侧腿举1-RM、最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)、局部肌肉耐力(XRM)、1-RM的40%(PP40)、60%(PP60)和80%(PP80)时的肌肉力量以及单侧垂直跳跃高度的变化。训练后,SUB组和SUPRA组在MVIC(分别增加19.2%和19.6%)、XRM(分别增加53.8%和23.8%)、PP40(分别增加16.2%和15.7%)、TTLM(分别增加2.5%和4.2%)、IGF-1(分别增加10.0%和14.1%)和IL-6(分别增加58.6%和28.6%)方面显示出相似的增加(P < 0.05)。然而,仅在SUPRA组观察到1-RM力量增加(16.3%)和单侧垂直跳跃高度增加(10.0%-13.4%)。实际上,对于增加1-RM,SUPRA训练比SUB训练更有利[效应量=0.77(1.49-0.05)]。SUB组中高强度的单侧肌肉力量(分别增加10.2%和10.5%)也有所增加,但两组之间无显著差异。次最大负荷和超最大负荷的10周EO训练后显示出相似的功能和结构效应。尽管超最大负荷在增加1-RM方面可能更优越,但在健康、活跃的个体中似乎没有必要使用这种方法。