School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Structure. 2022 Jul 7;30(7):925-933.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 May 9.
In the recent Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) competition, AlphaFold2 performed outstandingly. Its worst predictions were for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures, which has two alternative explanations: either the NMR structures were poor, implying that Alpha-Fold may be more accurate than NMR, or there is a genuine difference between crystal and solution structures. Here, we use the program Accuracy of NMR Structures Using RCI and Rigidity (ANSURR), which measures the accuracy of solution structures, and show that one of the NMR structures was indeed poor. We then compare Alpha-Fold predictions to NMR structures and show that Alpha-Fold tends to be more accurate than NMR ensembles. There are, however, some cases where the NMR ensembles are more accurate. These tend to be dynamic structures, where Alpha-Fold had low confidence. We suggest that Alpha-Fold could be used as the model for NMR-structure refinements and that Alpha-Fold structures validated by ANSURR may require no further refinement.
在最近的结构预测关键评估(Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction,简称 CASP)竞赛中,AlphaFold2 表现出色。它对核磁共振(nuclear magnetic resonance,简称 NMR)结构的预测最差,这有两种可能的解释:要么 NMR 结构本身较差,这意味着 Alpha-Fold 可能比 NMR 更准确,要么晶体和溶液结构之间确实存在差异。在这里,我们使用程序 Accuracy of NMR Structures Using RCI and Rigidity(简称 ANSURR),它可以衡量溶液结构的准确性,并表明其中一个 NMR 结构确实较差。然后,我们将 AlphaFold 的预测与 NMR 结构进行比较,并表明 AlphaFold 通常比 NMR 集合更准确。然而,在某些情况下,NMR 集合更准确。这些结构往往是动态的,AlphaFold 的置信度较低。我们建议将 AlphaFold 用作 NMR 结构精修的模型,并且经过 ANSURR 验证的 AlphaFold 结构可能不需要进一步精修。