Suppr超能文献

支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗宽颈或瘤颈比不佳的未破裂颈内动脉床突旁动脉瘤:采用倾向评分匹配分析的颅底腹侧壁与背侧壁比较。

Stent-assisted coiling of unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms with wide neck or unfavorable dome-to-neck ratio: Results of ventral wall vs dorsal wall with propensity score matching analysis.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Apr;30(2):147-153. doi: 10.1177/15910199221100966. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coil embolization of unruptured wide-necked paraclinoid aneurysms based on the projection distribution.

METHODS

Between November 2015 and September 2020, 267 unruptured paraclinod aneurysms in 236 patients were identified with a wide neck or unfavorable dome-to-neck ratio and treated with stent-assisted coiling technique. The classification of this segment aneurysms was simplified to the dorsal group (located on the anterior wall) and ventral group (Non-dorsal). Following propensity score matching analysis, the clinical and radiographic data were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among 267 aneurysms, 186 were located on the ventral wall and 81 were on the dorsal wall. Dorsal wall aneurysms had a larger size ( < .001), wider neck ( = .001), and higher dome-to-neck ratio ( = .023) compared with ventral wall aneurysms. Propensity score-matched analysis found that dorsal group had a significantly higher likelihood of unfavorable results in immediate (residual sac, 39.4% vs. 18.2%,  = .007) and follow-up angiography (residual sac, 14.8% vs. 1.9%,  = .037) compared with ventral group, with significant difference in recurrence rates (9.3% vs. 0%,  = .028). The rates of procedure-related complications were not significantly different, but one thromboembolic event occurred in the dorsal group with clinical deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional stent-assisted coiling can be given preference in paraclinoid aneurysms located on the ventral wall. The relatively high rate of recurrence in dorsal wall aneurysms with stent assistance may require other treatment options.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在基于投影分布评估支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞未破裂宽颈眼动脉瘤的临床安全性和有效性。

方法

2015 年 11 月至 2020 年 9 月,共 236 例患者中的 267 例未破裂眼动脉瘤存在宽颈或不利的瘤颈比,采用支架辅助弹簧圈技术进行治疗。该段动脉瘤简化分类为背侧组(位于前壁)和腹侧组(非背侧)。通过倾向评分匹配分析,比较两组的临床和影像学资料。

结果

在 267 个动脉瘤中,186 个位于腹侧壁,81 个位于背侧壁。与腹侧壁动脉瘤相比,背侧壁动脉瘤的瘤体更大( < .001),颈更宽( = .001),瘤颈比更高( = .023)。倾向评分匹配分析发现,与腹侧壁动脉瘤相比,背侧壁动脉瘤在即刻(残余瘤囊,39.4% vs. 18.2%,  = .007)和随访血管造影(残余瘤囊,14.8% vs. 1.9%,  = .037)中更有可能出现不良结果,且复发率差异有统计学意义(9.3% vs. 0%,  = .028)。手术相关并发症发生率无显著差异,但背侧组发生 1 例血栓栓塞事件,伴有临床恶化。

结论

传统支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞可优先用于腹侧壁的眼动脉瘤。支架辅助治疗背侧壁动脉瘤的复发率相对较高,可能需要其他治疗选择。

相似文献

2

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验