• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情时代的海洋保护区与恢复力

Marine reserves and resilience in the era of COVID-19.

作者信息

King Chloe, Adhuri Dedi S, Clifton Julian

机构信息

University of Lincoln, United Kingdom.

National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia.

出版信息

Mar Policy. 2022 Jul;141:105093. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105093. Epub 2022 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105093
PMID:35540179
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9072811/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced coastal communities around the world to re-evaluate their approaches to marine conservation and marine protected area (MPA) management. Initial studies have called for the need for improved social-ecological resilience of MPAs to improve the adaptive capacity of communities and ecosystems to respond to future crises. However, as posed by Armitage and Johnson (2006), it is critical that MPA managers ask the question "for what and for whom are we trying to promote resilience?" in designing more resilient MPAs for a post-pandemic world. Based on a systematic literature review of marine reserve impacts and supported by fieldwork conducted in the Wakatobi National Park in Indonesia over the course of the COVID-19 crisis, this study examines what opportunities for transformations in MPA management and governance have emerged, and how MPAs can focus on incorporating principles of equitable resilience as they build back from the pandemic. The findings demonstrate how equitable resilience can be undermined when the voices and interests of local communities are sidelined in favour of powerful interest groups such as tourism or NGOs. Ultimately, the paper concludes that planning for resilience in MPAs must synchronize with local realities to better realize the potential for system transformation and a reimagining of MPA capacity to better serve local communities.

摘要

新冠疫情迫使世界各地的沿海社区重新评估其海洋保护和海洋保护区(MPA)管理方法。初步研究呼吁提高海洋保护区的社会生态恢复力,以增强社区和生态系统应对未来危机的适应能力。然而,正如阿米蒂奇和约翰逊(2006年)所指出的,在为后疫情时代设计更具恢复力的海洋保护区时,海洋保护区管理者提出“我们试图为了什么以及为了谁来提升恢复力?”这个问题至关重要。基于对海洋保护区影响的系统文献综述,并在新冠疫情危机期间于印度尼西亚瓦卡托比国家公园开展的实地调查的支持下,本研究探讨了海洋保护区管理和治理变革出现了哪些机遇,以及海洋保护区在从疫情中恢复的过程中如何注重纳入公平恢复力原则。研究结果表明,当地方社区的声音和利益为了诸如旅游业或非政府组织等强大利益集团而被边缘化时,公平恢复力可能会受到损害。最终,本文得出结论,海洋保护区的恢复力规划必须与当地实际情况同步,以更好地实现系统变革的潜力,并重新构想海洋保护区更好地服务当地社区的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1953/9072811/343793429729/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1953/9072811/ee4df5d27de2/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1953/9072811/343793429729/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1953/9072811/ee4df5d27de2/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1953/9072811/343793429729/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Marine reserves and resilience in the era of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的海洋保护区与恢复力
Mar Policy. 2022 Jul;141:105093. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105093. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
A marine protected area network does not confer community structure resilience to a marine heatwave across coastal ecosystems.海洋保护区网络并不能为沿海生态系统在海洋热浪中提供群落结构的恢复力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Oct;29(19):5634-5651. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16862. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Incorporating climate change adaptation into marine protected area planning.将气候变化适应纳入海洋保护区规划。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jun;26(6):3251-3267. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15094. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
4
'It's not just about fish': Assessing the social impacts of marine protected areas on the wellbeing of coastal communities in New South Wales.“不仅仅是鱼类”:评估新南威尔士州海洋保护区对沿海社区福祉的社会影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244605. eCollection 2020.
5
Understanding How Marine Protected Areas Influence Local Prosperity-A Case Study of Gili Matra, Indonesia.理解海洋保护区如何影响当地繁荣——以印度尼西亚吉利马塔为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013508.
6
Evaluating approaches for scaling-up community-based marine-protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks.评估将基于社区的海洋保护区扩大为社会公平和生态代表性的网络的方法。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Feb;34(1):137-147. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13368. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Improving marine protected area governance through collaboration and co-production.通过合作和共同生产来改善海洋保护区治理。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 1;269:110757. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110757. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
An approach to incorporating inferred connectivity of adult movement into marine protected area design with limited data.将成年生物运动推断出的连通性纳入有限数据的海洋保护区设计的方法。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Jun;29(4):e01890. doi: 10.1002/eap.1890. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
9
Marine protected areas in the context of climate change: key challenges for coastal social-ecological systems.气候变化背景下的海洋保护区:沿海社会-生态系统面临的主要挑战。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Jul 4;377(1854):20210131. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0131. Epub 2022 May 16.
10
Benefits and Challenges of Scaling Up Expansion of Marine Protected Area Networks in the Verde Island Passage, Central Philippines.菲律宾中部维尔迪岛海峡扩大海洋保护区网络的益处与挑战
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0135789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135789. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Community Composition and Successional Theory to Guide Site-Specific Coral Reef Management.运用群落组成与演替理论指导特定地点的珊瑚礁管理。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Jan;31(1):e70050. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70050.
2
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Galapagos Islands' seafood system from consumers' perspectives.从消费者的角度看 COVID-19 大流行对加拉巴哥斯群岛海鲜系统的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):1690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52247-5.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 pandemic impacts on conservation research, management, and public engagement in US national parks.新冠疫情对美国国家公园的保护研究、管理及公众参与的影响。
Biol Conserv. 2021 May;257:109038. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109038. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
COVID-19 and protected areas: Impacts, conflicts, and possible management solutions.新型冠状病毒肺炎与保护区:影响、冲突及可能的管理解决方案
Conserv Lett. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):e12800. doi: 10.1111/conl.12800. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the COVID-19 pandemic.
城市自然区域和城市生态系统服务在 COVID-19 大流行期间的重要性。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 17;15(12):e0243344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243344. eCollection 2020.
4
COVID-19 provides an opportunity to advance a sustainable UK fisheries policy in a post-Brexit brave new world.新冠疫情为英国在脱欧后的全新世界中推进可持续渔业政策提供了契机。
Mar Policy. 2020 Oct;120:104114. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104114. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Progress toward Equitably Managed Protected Areas in Aichi Target 11: A Global Survey.《迈向公平管理的爱知目标11保护区的进展:全球调查》
Bioscience. 2019 Mar 1;69(3):191-197. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biy143. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
What is equitable resilience?什么是公平的适应力?
World Dev. 2018 Sep;109:197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.020.
7
Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health - A systematic review of reviews.城市自然环境作为改善公众健康的基于自然的解决方案——综述的系统评价
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:373-384. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
8
Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally.能力短缺阻碍了全球海洋保护区的运行。
Nature. 2017 Mar 30;543(7647):665-669. doi: 10.1038/nature21708. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30. Epub 2009 Jul 21.