Luthy D A, Shy K K, van Belle G, Larson E B, Hughes J P, Benedetti T J, Brown Z A, Effer S, King J F, Stenchever M A
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;69(5):687-95.
Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring and fetal blood gas sampling were compared with periodic auscultation of FHR in a multicentered randomized trial of preterm singleton pregnancies with fetal weights of 700-1750 g. Two hundred forty-six pregnancies were studied (electronic FHR monitoring N = 122, auscultation N = 124). Perinatal or infant death was associated with 14% of pregnancies with electronic FHR monitoring and 15% with auscultation. No significant differences were noted in the prevalence of low five-minute Apgar scores, intrapartum acidosis, intracranial hemorrhage, or frequency of cesarean section (P greater than .10). Compared with electronic FHR monitoring, intrapartum auscultation as done in this study is unlikely to be associated with detectable differences in perinatal outcomes within the high-risk setting of preterm labor.
在一项针对胎儿体重为700 - 1750克的早产单胎妊娠的多中心随机试验中,对产时电子胎儿心率(FHR)监测和胎儿血气采样与FHR定期听诊进行了比较。共研究了246例妊娠(电子FHR监测组N = 122,听诊组N = 124)。围产期或婴儿死亡在电子FHR监测组的妊娠中占14%,在听诊组中占15%。在低五分钟阿氏评分、产时酸中毒、颅内出血的发生率或剖宫产频率方面未发现显著差异(P大于0.10)。与电子FHR监测相比,本研究中所采用的产时听诊在早产高危情况下,不太可能与围产期结局的可检测差异相关。