Zanoni Patrizia, Mir Raza
Hasselt University, Belgium.
William Paterson University, USA.
Organization (Lond). 2022 May;29(3):369-378. doi: 10.1177/13505084221090633.
This editorial introduces eight papers included in this special issue on COVID-19. Together, these papers draw key theoretical and political insights for critical organization studies from the pandemic along three main lines. First, they examine how COVID-19 has denaturalized global capitalism, leading to a broad interrogation of the organization of the economy and our societies. Second, they point to how COVID-19 has unveiled the close relation between capital and the state in producing inequalities old and new, a relation that neoliberalism tends to hide from view. Third, they leverage COVID-19 to give voice to the largely female disposable workforce in the Global South on whose work global commodity flows, consumption and capital accumulation rest. We conclude by pointing to the need to address constitutive interdependencies, such as those between wage work and reproductive work, the global North and the global South, the market and the state, to name only a few. We further call for expanding traditional understandings of struggle to include a broader range of social antagonisms (e.g. for sufficient time to care, education, healthcare, housing, safe public spaces, accessible to all) as part of a theoretically and politically renewed organizational research agenda fostering solidarity.
这篇社论介绍了本期关于新冠疫情的特刊中的八篇论文。这些论文共同从三个主要方面为批判性组织研究提供了关键的理论和政治见解,这些见解源于这场疫情。首先,它们探讨了新冠疫情如何使全球资本主义“去自然化”,引发了对经济和社会结构的广泛审视。其次,它们指出新冠疫情如何揭示了资本与国家在制造新旧不平等方面的紧密关系,而新自由主义往往掩盖了这种关系。第三,它们借助新冠疫情,让全球南方大量从事非核心工作的女性发出声音,全球商品流通、消费和资本积累都依赖她们的劳动。我们在结论中指出,有必要解决结构性的相互依存关系,比如工资劳动与再生产劳动之间、全球北方与全球南方之间、市场与国家之间的相互依存关系,这里仅列举几个例子。我们还呼吁拓展对斗争的传统理解,将更广泛的社会对抗(例如争取足够的时间用于照料、教育、医疗、住房、安全的公共空间,人人可及)纳入其中,作为理论和政治层面经过更新的组织研究议程的一部分,以促进团结。