Gibson Joshua S, Narayanan Sudarshan, Swallow Jack E N, Kumar-Thakur Pardeep, Pasta Mauro, Lee Tien-Lin, Weatherup Robert S
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK.
The Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, OX11 0RA, UK.
Faraday Discuss. 2022 Aug 25;236(0):267-287. doi: 10.1039/d1fd00118c.
The key charge transfer processes in electrochemical energy storage devices occur at electrode-electrolyte interfaces, which are typically buried, making it challenging to access their interfacial chemistry. In the case of Li-ion batteries, metallic Li electrodes hold promise for increasing energy and power densities and, when used in conjunction with solid electrolytes, the adverse safety implications associated with dendrite formation in organic liquid electrolytes can potentially be overcome. To better understand the stability of solid electrolytes when in contact with alkali metals and the reactions that occur, here we consider the deposition of thin (∼10 nm) alkali metal films onto solid electrolyte surfaces, where the metal is thin enough that X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy can probe the buried electrode-electrolyte interface. We highlight the importance of alkali metal deposition by assessing the contaminant species that are present after glovebox handling and the use of 'inert' transfer devices. Consequently, we compare and contrast three available methods for alkali-metal deposition; Li sputter deposition, Li evaporation, and Li plating induced by e flood-gun irradiation. Studies on both a sulphide solid electrolyte (LiPSCl), and a single-layer graphene probe surface reveal that the more energetic Li deposition methods, such as sputtering, can induce surface damage and interfacial mixing that are not seen with thermal evaporation. This indicates that the appropriate selection of the Li deposition method for studies is required to observe representative behaviour, and the results of previous studies involving energetic deposition may warrant further evaluation.
电化学储能装置中的关键电荷转移过程发生在电极 - 电解质界面,这些界面通常是隐蔽的,这使得获取其界面化学性质具有挑战性。对于锂离子电池而言,金属锂电极有望提高能量和功率密度,并且当与固体电解质结合使用时,有可能克服与有机液体电解质中枝晶形成相关的不利安全问题。为了更好地理解固体电解质与碱金属接触时的稳定性以及发生的反应,在此我们考虑在固体电解质表面沉积薄(约10纳米)的碱金属薄膜,其中金属足够薄,使得X射线光电子能谱能够探测埋藏的电极 - 电解质界面。我们通过评估手套箱操作和使用“惰性”转移装置后存在的污染物种类,强调了碱金属沉积的重要性。因此,我们比较和对比了三种可用的碱金属沉积方法;锂溅射沉积、锂蒸发以及电子束枪辐照诱导的锂电镀。对硫化物固体电解质(LiPSCl)和单层石墨烯探针表面的研究表明,能量更高的锂沉积方法,如溅射,会导致表面损伤和界面混合,而热蒸发则不会出现这种情况。这表明为了观察到具有代表性的行为,需要为研究选择合适的锂沉积方法,并且先前涉及高能沉积的研究结果可能需要进一步评估。