Clinical assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University.
Data analyst in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University.
Ethics Hum Res. 2022 May;44(3):12-23. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500126.
Research participants should be drawn as fairly as possible from the potential volunteer population. Underlying personality traits are underexplored as factors influencing research decision-making. Dispositional optimism, known to affect coping, physical health, and psychological well-being, has been minimally studied with respect to research-related attitudes. We conducted an exploratory, online survey with 151 individuals (with self-reported mental illness [n = 50], physical illness [n = 51], or neither [n = 50]) recruited via MTurk. We evaluated associations between dispositional optimism (assessed with the Life Orientation Test-Revised) and general research attitudes, perceived protectiveness of five research safeguards, and willingness to participate in research using safeguards. Strongly optimistic respondents expressed more positive research attitudes and perceived four safeguards as more positively influencing willingness to participate. Optimism was positively associated with expressed willingness to participate in clinical research. Our findings add to a limited literature on the influence of individual traits on ethically salient research perspectives.
研究参与者应尽可能公平地从潜在的志愿者群体中抽取。作为影响研究决策的因素,潜在的人格特质尚未得到充分探索。性格乐观,已知会影响应对能力、身体健康和心理健康,与研究相关的态度相关性研究很少。我们通过 MTurk 在线调查了 151 名参与者(报告有精神疾病的参与者[n=50]、有身体疾病的参与者[n=51]和无疾病的参与者[n=50])。我们评估了性格乐观(用生活取向测试修订版评估)与一般研究态度、对五种研究保护措施的保护感知,以及使用保护措施参与研究的意愿之间的关联。高度乐观的受访者表达了更积极的研究态度,并认为四项保护措施对参与意愿的影响更为积极。乐观与表达参与临床研究的意愿呈正相关。我们的研究结果补充了关于个体特质对具有伦理意义的研究观点的影响的有限文献。