• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高容量低复杂性普通外科中与发病率相关的体重指数临界值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Critical values for body mass index related to morbidity in high-volume low-complexity general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Harries K, Lewis W G, Egan R J

机构信息

Swansea Bay University Health Board, UK.

University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Apr;107(4):242-252. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057
PMID:39141001
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11957843/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI, kg/m) on outcomes of high-volume low-complexity (HVLC) general surgery procedures and to determine critical values for BMI when selecting patients into HVLC programmes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of studies looking at patients in different BMI categories undergoing HVLC general surgery procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair and umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair), in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comparison meta-analysis model was constructed to compare the outcomes using random-effects modelling. The QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis Studies) tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system were used to assess bias.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies including 486,392 patients were examined. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, BMI ≥40 was associated with higher conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, =0.040) but did not affect complications (OR: 0.69, =0.400) or length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD]: -0.01 days, =0.900). In inguinal hernia repair, BMI ≥35 was associated with longer operative time (MD: 18.00 minutes, <0.00001), and higher risk of wound complications (OR: 3.01, <0.00001) and hospital readmission (OR: 1.46, =0.0008). In umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair, BMI ≥30 was associated with higher risk of wound complications (OR: 6.45, <0.0001) and hospital readmission (OR: 5.56, <0.00001), and longer operative time (MD: 4.01 minutes, =0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity was associated with longer operative time (up to 23 minutes) and higher risk of postoperative morbidity (up to 4-fold) in HVLC procedures. BMI <40 (moderate GRADE certainty - laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and BMI <35 (moderate GRADE certainty - inguinal hernia) appear to represent optimal critical values for perioperative safety metrics.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在探讨体重指数(BMI,kg/m²)对高容量低复杂性(HVLC)普通外科手术结局的影响,并确定在选择患者进入HVLC项目时BMI的临界值。

方法

根据PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,对不同BMI类别患者接受HVLC普通外科手术(腹腔镜胆囊切除术、腹股沟疝修补术和脐疝或脐旁疝修补术)的研究进行系统评价。构建比较Meta分析模型,采用随机效应模型比较结局。使用QUIPS(预后研究质量)工具和GRADE(推荐评估、制定和评价分级)系统评估偏倚。

结果

共审查了26项研究,包括486392名患者。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,BMI≥40与更高的转为开放手术的比例相关(比值比[OR]:1.33,P=0.040),但不影响并发症(OR:0.69,P=0.400)或住院时间(平均差[MD]:-0.01天,P=0.900)。在腹股沟疝修补术中,BMI≥35与更长的手术时间相关(MD:18.00分钟,P<0.00001),以及更高的伤口并发症风险(OR:3.01,P<0.00001)和再次入院风险(OR:1.46,P=0.0008)。在脐疝或脐旁疝修补术中,BMI≥30与更高的伤口并发症风险(OR:6.45,P<0.0001)和再次入院风险(OR:5.56,P<0.00001)以及更长的手术时间相关(MD:4.01分钟,P=0.030)。

结论

在HVLC手术中,肥胖与更长的手术时间(长达23分钟)和更高的术后发病率风险(高达4倍)相关。BMI<40(中等GRADE确定性 - 腹腔镜胆囊切除术)和BMI<35(中等GRADE确定性 - 腹股沟疝)似乎代表围手术期安全指标的最佳临界值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/e1f20a705498/rcsann.2024.0057.03c.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/8d80887de271/rcsann.2024.0057.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/a343f6c4dd07/rcsann.2024.0057.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/5e68d5b3362a/rcsann.2024.0057.03a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/8b0728d5df94/rcsann.2024.0057.03b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/e1f20a705498/rcsann.2024.0057.03c.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/8d80887de271/rcsann.2024.0057.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/a343f6c4dd07/rcsann.2024.0057.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/5e68d5b3362a/rcsann.2024.0057.03a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/8b0728d5df94/rcsann.2024.0057.03b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e21/11957843/e1f20a705498/rcsann.2024.0057.03c.jpg

相似文献

1
Critical values for body mass index related to morbidity in high-volume low-complexity general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高容量低复杂性普通外科中与发病率相关的体重指数临界值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Apr;107(4):242-252. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放脐疝或脐旁疝修补术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):905-916. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1683-y. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
3
Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications.开放手术与腹腔镜下单侧腹股沟疝修补术:确定降低并发症的理想体重指数
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):206-214. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4958-y. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery.机器人技术在微创外科时代的急诊普通外科手术中的应用。
JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):493-499. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016.
5
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
6
Safety of Simultaneous Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与腹股沟疝修补术同期进行的安全性:一项系统评价
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025 Jan;35(1):22-30. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0287. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
7
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
8
Inflammatory response and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: randomized clinical trial (ROLAIS).腹腔镜与机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后的炎症反应及短期结局:随机临床试验(ROLAIS)
Br J Surg. 2025 Mar 28;112(4). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf074.
9
A comparative study of standard versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.标准腹腔镜下单部位手术(LESS)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2879-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1636-y. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
10
Exploration of umbilical hernia incidence and etiology in 753 cases of single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective analysis.753例单孔腹腔镜手术脐疝发生率及病因探讨:一项回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2025 May 22;25(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02958-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Wound Complications and Hernia Recurrence in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.腹壁重建中伤口并发症和疝复发的危险因素:一项单机构回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jul 23;17(7):e88565. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88565. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The Potential for Lifestyle Intervention Among Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour Based on Patient Needs Including Smoking and Other Risky Lifestyle Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.基于患者需求(包括吸烟和其他危险生活方式因素)的膀胱肿瘤经尿道切除术患者生活方式干预的潜力:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 8;21(12):1633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121633.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of body mass index with 30-day outcomes following groin hernia repair.腹股沟疝修补术后体重指数与30天预后的关联。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1095-1102. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02773-4. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
2
The Impact of Body Mass Index on Local Anaesthetic Inguinal Hernia Repair.体重指数对局部麻醉腹股沟疝修补术的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36163. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36163. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
A predictive model for the post-pandemic delay in elective treatment.一种关于大流行后择期治疗延迟的预测模型。
Oper Res Health Care. 2022 Sep;34:100357. doi: 10.1016/j.orhc.2022.100357. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
4
Modeling the Recovery of Elective Waiting Lists Following COVID-19: Scenario Projections for England.模拟新冠疫情后择期手术等候名单的恢复情况:英格兰的情景预测
Value Health. 2022 Nov;25(11):1805-1813. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
5
Prevalence and Correlates of Overweight and Obesity in 12 European Countries in 2017-2018.2017-2018 年 12 个欧洲国家超重和肥胖的流行率及其相关因素。
Obes Facts. 2022;15(5):655-665. doi: 10.1159/000525792. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
Comparison of BMI on operative time and complications of robotic inguinal hernia repair at a VA medical center.在退伍军人事务医疗中心比较 BMI 对机器人腹股沟疝修补术手术时间和并发症的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9398-9402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09259-x. Epub 2022 May 11.
7
The impact of obesity on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for high-risk abdominal emergencies.肥胖对高危腹部急症行急诊剖腹手术患者手术结局的影响。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jan 15;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01466-6.
8
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis.非肥胖患者与肥胖患者行机器人腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期结局比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1033-1039. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02433-5. Epub 2021 May 31.
9
Outcomes of obese compared to non-obese veterans undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: a case-control study.肥胖与非肥胖退伍军人行开放式腹股沟疝修补术的结果比较:病例对照研究。
Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1289-1294. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02382-z. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
Postoperative outcomes of ventral hernia repair in veterans.退伍军人的腹疝修补术后结果。
Surgery. 2021 Mar;169(3):603-609. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 17.