Suppr超能文献

在评估人类和猪尸体的分解时,质量损失与全身评分相比如何?

How does mass loss compare with total body score when assessing decomposition of human and pig cadavers?

机构信息

Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022 Sep;18(3):343-351. doi: 10.1007/s12024-022-00481-6. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

Providing accurate and reliable measures of decomposition is paramount for forensic research where decomposition progress is used to estimate time of death. Mass loss is routinely used as a direct measure of biomass decomposition in ecological studies, yet few studies have analysed mass loss in a forensic context on human cadavers to determine its usefulness for modelling the decomposition process. Mass loss was examined in decomposing human and pig cadavers, and compared with other common decomposition metrics, such as total body score (TBS). One summer and one winter field decomposition experiment was conducted using human and pig cadavers, as pigs are often used as proxies for human cadavers in forensic research. The two measures of decomposition revealed two contrasting patterns of decomposition on pigs and humans, particularly in winter where TBS stabilised at similar values, but mass loss differed greatly. Mass loss was found to be faster in pigs than humans during early decomposition. Pigs lost 75% of their mass in winter, while humans lost less than 50%; however, in summer, both lost around 80% of their mass. TBS displayed similar patterns in both experiments, with TBS increasing more rapidly in pigs compared with humans but both eventually reaching similar TBS values in late decomposition. Measuring mass loss can provide additional information about decomposition progress that is missed if using TBS only. Key differences in decomposition progress between cadaver types were also observed, suggesting caution when extrapolating data from pigs to humans for forensic research and decomposition modelling.

摘要

提供准确可靠的分解测量结果对于法医学研究至关重要,因为分解进展可用于估计死亡时间。在生态研究中,质量损失通常被用作生物量分解的直接测量,但很少有研究在法医背景下分析人类尸体的质量损失,以确定其在建模分解过程中的有用性。本研究检查了分解中的人类和猪尸体,并将其与其他常见的分解指标(如总体体分评分(TBS))进行了比较。使用人类和猪尸体进行了一个夏季和一个冬季的野外分解实验,因为在法医研究中,猪通常被用作人类尸体的替代品。这两种分解测量方法揭示了猪和人类分解的两种截然不同的模式,特别是在冬季,TBS 稳定在相似的值,但质量损失差异很大。在早期分解过程中,猪的质量损失比人类快。在冬季,猪的体重损失了 75%,而人类的体重损失不到 50%;然而,在夏季,两者的体重都损失了约 80%。TBS 在两个实验中都显示出相似的模式,与人类相比,TBS 在猪中的增加速度更快,但最终在晚期分解中都达到了相似的 TBS 值。仅使用 TBS 可能会错过分解进展的其他信息,因此测量质量损失可以提供有关分解进展的额外信息。还观察到不同尸体类型之间分解进展的关键差异,这表明在法医研究和分解建模中从猪推断数据时应谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验