• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multinational landscape of health app policy: toward regulatory consensus on digital health.健康应用程序政策的跨国格局:迈向数字健康的监管共识。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 May 11;5(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00604-x.
2
Diabetes Digital App Technology: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations. A Consensus Report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group.糖尿病数字应用技术:效益、挑战和建议。欧洲糖尿病研究协会 (EASD) 和美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 糖尿病技术工作组的共识报告。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):250-260. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0062. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
PERSPECTIVE: The Digital Health App Policy Landscape: Regulatory Gaps and Choices Through the Lens of Mental Health.观点:数字健康应用政策领域:透过心理健康视角看监管空白与选择。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2021 Sep 1;24(3):101-108.
4
Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group.糖尿病数字 APP 技术:效益、挑战和建议。欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)和美国糖尿病协会(ADA)糖尿病技术工作组的共识报告。
Diabetologia. 2020 Feb;63(2):229-241. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05034-1.
5
The "Hot Potato" of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena.心理健康类 APP 监管的“烫手山芋”:以澳大利亚政策领域为例的批判性个案研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Mar 1;8(3):168-176. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.117.
6
The Emerging Imperative for a Consensus Approach Toward the Rating and Clinical Recommendation of Mental Health Apps.对心理健康应用程序进行评级和临床推荐的共识方法的迫切需求日益凸显。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018 Aug;206(8):662-666. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000864.
7
Practitioners' and Policymakers' Successes, Challenges, Innovations, and Learning in Promoting Children's Well-being During COVID-19: Protocol for a Multinational Smartphone App Survey.从业者与政策制定者在新冠疫情期间促进儿童福祉方面的成功、挑战、创新及经验教训:一项跨国智能手机应用程序调查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jul 29;10(7):e31013. doi: 10.2196/31013.
8
Regulation and accreditation of addictive behaviour applications-navigating the landscape.成瘾行为应用的监管和认证——探索现状。
Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3276-3283. doi: 10.1111/add.15484. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
Consumer preference to utilise a mobile health app: A stated preference experiment.消费者偏好使用移动健康应用程序:一项陈述偏好实验。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229546. eCollection 2020.
10
Understanding Antimicrobial Resistance from the Perspective of Public Policy: A Multinational Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception Survey to Determine Global Awareness.从公共政策视角理解抗菌药物耐药性:一项旨在确定全球认知度的多国知识、态度与认知调查
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 4;10(12):1486. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121486.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking Performance Factors of Innovation Systems and Studying Germany's Attempt to Foster the Role of the Patient Through a Market Access Pathway for Digital Health Applications (DiGAs): Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.剖析创新系统的绩效因素并研究德国通过数字健康应用(DiGAs)的市场准入途径促进患者作用的尝试:探索性混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 6;27:e66356. doi: 10.2196/66356.
2
Exploring the role of health applications in promoting health among older adults: a scoping review protocol.探索健康应用程序在促进老年人健康方面的作用:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):e085995. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085995.
3
Regulatory Standards and Guidance for the Use of Health Apps for Self-Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Scoping Review.监管标准和指导意见:撒哈拉以南非洲地区健康 APP 自我管理应用的使用规范-范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 11;26:e49163. doi: 10.2196/49163.
4
Vickybot, a Chatbot for Anxiety-Depressive Symptoms and Work-Related Burnout in Primary Care and Health Care Professionals: Development, Feasibility, and Potential Effectiveness Studies.Vickybot,一种用于初级保健和医疗保健专业人员的焦虑抑郁症状和与工作相关的倦怠的聊天机器人:开发、可行性和潜在有效性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 3;25:e43293. doi: 10.2196/43293.

本文引用的文献

1
Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries' approaches.健康应用政策:九个国家方法的国际比较
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Mar 18;5(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00573-1.
2
Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study.移动健康与隐私:横断面研究
BMJ. 2021 Jun 16;373:n1248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1248.
3
From principles to practice: benchmarking government guidance on health apps.从原则到实践:政府健康应用指南的基准评估
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jun;1(2):e55-e57. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30027-5. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Using science to sell apps: Evaluation of mental health app store quality claims.利用科学推销应用程序:对心理健康应用程序商店质量宣称的评估
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Mar 22;2:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0093-1. eCollection 2019.
5
Challenges and opportunities in software-driven medical devices.软件驱动型医疗设备中的挑战与机遇。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2019 Jul;3(7):493-497. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0426-z.
6
Health Apps and Health Policy: What Is Needed?健康应用程序与健康政策:需要什么?
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):1975-1976. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14378.
7
Health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act--a progress report.《平价医疗法案》下的医疗保健覆盖情况——一份进展报告。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):275-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1405667. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
8
Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection.智能手机应用程序在黑色素瘤检测中的诊断准确性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Apr;149(4):422-6. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.2382.

健康应用程序政策的跨国格局:迈向数字健康的监管共识。

Multinational landscape of health app policy: toward regulatory consensus on digital health.

作者信息

Diao James A, Venkatesh Kaushik P, Raza Marium M, Kvedar Joseph C

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2022 May 11;5(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00604-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-022-00604-x
PMID:35545663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9095713/
Abstract

Due to its enormous capacity for benefit, harm, and cost, health care is among the most tightly regulated industries in the world. But with the rise of smartphones, an explosion of direct-to-consumer mobile health applications has challenged the role of centralized gatekeepers. As interest in health apps continue to climb, national regulatory bodies have turned their attention toward strategies to protect consumers from apps that mine and sell health data, recommend unsafe practices, or simply do not work as advertised. To characterize the current state and outlook of these efforts, Essén and colleagues map the nascent landscape of national health app policies and raise several considerations for cross-border collaboration. Strategies to increase transparency, organize app marketplaces, and monitor existing apps are needed to ensure that the global wave of new digital health tools fulfills its promise to improve health at scale.

摘要

由于医疗保健在造福、危害和成本方面具有巨大影响力,它是世界上监管最严格的行业之一。但随着智能手机的兴起,直接面向消费者的移动健康应用程序激增,挑战了集中把关者的角色。随着对健康应用程序的兴趣持续攀升,国家监管机构已将注意力转向保护消费者免受挖掘和销售健康数据、推荐不安全做法或根本无法按宣传效果运作的应用程序影响的策略。为了描述这些努力的现状和前景,埃森及其同事描绘了国家健康应用程序政策的新领域,并提出了一些跨境合作的考虑因素。需要采取提高透明度、组织应用程序市场和监测现有应用程序的策略,以确保新的数字健康工具全球浪潮兑现其大规模改善健康状况的承诺。