Respiratory Department, University Hospital of Aranjuez, Madrid, Spain.
Respiratory Department, University Hospital of Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 May 4;17:1005-1015. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S360938. eCollection 2022.
The pharmacological treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is largely based on inhaled bronchodilators. Inspiratory flow and lung deposition are key parameters to be considered in inhaled therapy; however, the relationship between these two parameters, the patient specificities, and the suitability of the inhaler type for COPD management has not been fully addressed. The present study follows a Delphi Panel methodology to find expert consensus on the role of inspiratory flow and lung deposition as key decision factors in COPD inhaled therapy.
A two-round Delphi Panel, consisting of 38 statements (items) and completed by 57 Spanish pulmonologists, was carried out to measure the experts' consensus degree with each item.
A high degree of consensus was reached on most of the items consulted, among these inspiratory flow or inspiratory capacity should be periodically considered when choosing an inhalation device and to ensure the suitability of the inhaler used; the outflow velocity and particle size of the different devices should be considered to ensure adequate lung deposition; an active device (pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) or soft mist inhalers (SMI)) should be used in patients with low inspiratory flow to achieve adequate lung deposition; and, the use of dry powder inhalers (DPI) should be re-evaluated in patients with severe obstruction and severe exacerbations.
This study shows the relevance of inspiratory flow and the degree of particle deposition in the lung in the choice of an inhalation device for COPD management, as well as the convenience of an SMI type device in cases of low inspiratory flow. Moreover, it highlights the scarcity of information on the specific features of inhalation devices in COPD guidelines.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的药物治疗主要基于吸入性支气管扩张剂。吸气流量和肺部沉积是吸入治疗中需要考虑的关键参数;然而,这两个参数之间的关系、患者的个体差异以及吸入器类型对 COPD 管理的适用性尚未得到充分解决。本研究采用德尔菲专家咨询法,就吸气流量和肺部沉积作为 COPD 吸入治疗的关键决策因素,寻求专家共识。
进行了两轮德尔菲专家咨询,由 38 项陈述(项目)组成,由 57 名西班牙肺病专家完成,以衡量每位专家对每项陈述的共识程度。
在咨询的大多数项目中,达成了高度共识,其中包括在选择吸入装置和确保使用的吸入器合适时,应定期考虑吸气流量或吸气量;应考虑不同装置的流出速度和颗粒大小,以确保肺部有足够的沉积;对于吸气流量低的患者,应使用主动装置(压力定量吸入器(pMDI)或软雾吸入器(SMI))以实现足够的肺部沉积;对于严重阻塞和严重加重的患者,应重新评估干粉吸入器(DPI)的使用。
本研究表明,在选择 COPD 管理的吸入装置时,吸气流量和肺部沉积程度具有重要意义,对于吸气流量低的患者,SMI 型装置具有便利性。此外,它还强调了 COPD 指南中关于吸入装置具体特征的信息匮乏。