Private Practice, Madre Vedruna 14 bajo derecho, 50008, Zaragoza, Spain.
Department of Human Anatomy and Histology, University of Zaragoza, Calle Domingo Miral s/n, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2022 May 12;12(1):7854. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11564-3.
People with lower limb amputation present greater displacements of their centre of gravity in a static situation than able-bodied individuals, as they depend on visual information to a greater extent, which implies an altered stability pattern. The efficacy of different hardness of plantar support to help maintain stability has not yet been determined. The aim of the present study is to assess stability in people with unilateral transtibial amputation with prosthesis in a static situation with insoles of different degrees of hardness and visual conditions with respect to the able-bodied population. For this purpose, 25 patients with amputation and 25 able-bodied individuals were included in both groups, postural stability was assessed by stabilometry. This assessment was carried out under normal conditions (on the floor of the dynamometric platform with eyes open), and under altered conditions (with the interposition of different materials such as plantar support: rigid and soft insoles and, eyes shut). Three variables were considered to assess stability: length of movement of the barycenter (mm), lateral velocity (mm/sg) and anterior velocity (mm/sg). All of them were analysed with the patient in static on the dynamometric platform. The results showed statistically significant differences between the two groups, (amputees and controls) with less stability in the amputee group (p < 0.05) when analysing the variables of length of movement of the barycenter, lateral velocity and anterior velocity. Amputee patients with open eyes exhibited greater stability than those with closed eyes. The hard insoles improved the stability data in amputees (length of movement of the barycenter and anterior velocity) with respect to the barefoot condition, and the soft insoles showed less stability than the patients with hard insoles, or than the barefoot patients. From the results obtained in this study, we can conclude that the PP-DWST 4 mm rigid insoles improve static stability in people with amputation. However, soft insoles impair stability and are therefore discouraged.
下肢截肢者在静态情况下的重心位移大于健全人,因为他们在更大程度上依赖视觉信息,这意味着稳定性模式发生了改变。不同硬度的足底支撑对帮助维持稳定性的效果尚未确定。本研究旨在评估使用不同硬度鞋垫在静态情况下使用假肢的单侧胫骨截肢患者的稳定性,并与健全人群进行比较。为此,将 25 名截肢患者和 25 名健全人纳入两组,通过平衡仪评估姿势稳定性。评估在正常条件下(在测力平台的地板上,睁眼)和改变条件下(插入不同材料,如足底支撑:硬和软鞋垫,闭眼)进行。考虑了三个变量来评估稳定性:重心移动的长度(mm)、侧向速度(mm/sg)和前向速度(mm/sg)。所有这些都在测力平台上的静态患者中进行分析。结果显示,两组之间存在统计学差异(截肢者和对照组),截肢者组的稳定性较差(p<0.05),分析重心移动长度、侧向速度和前向速度等变量时。睁眼的截肢患者比闭眼的患者表现出更大的稳定性。硬鞋垫改善了截肢患者的稳定性数据(重心移动长度和前向速度),与赤脚状态相比,软鞋垫的稳定性比硬鞋垫的患者或赤脚的患者差。从本研究的结果可以得出结论,PP-DWST 4mm 硬鞋垫可改善截肢患者的静态稳定性。然而,软鞋垫会降低稳定性,因此不建议使用。