Sooreshjani Moloud Aflaki, Gursoy Ulvi K, Aryal Uma K, Sintim Herman O
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University West Lafayette IN 47907 USA.
Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku Turku Finland.
RSC Adv. 2018 Nov 7;8(64):36840-36851. doi: 10.1039/c8ra04603d. eCollection 2018 Oct 26.
Global and quantitative analysis of the proteome help to reveal how host cells sense invading bacteria and respond to bacterial signaling molecules. Here, we performed label free quantitative proteomic analysis of RAW macrophages treated with host-derived cGAMP and bacterial-derived c-di-GMP, in an attempt to identify cellular pathways impacted by these dinucleotides and determine if the host responds differentially to these two cyclic dinucleotides. We identified a total of 3811 proteins of which abundances of 404 proteins in cGAMP and 236 proteins in c-di-GMP treated cells were significantly different compared to the control. Many of the proteins that were strongly and commonly upregulated, such as interferon-induced proteins 47, 202 and 204 (Ifi47, Ifi202, Ifi204), ubiquitin-activating enzyme E7 (Uba7), interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1, 2 or 3 (Ifit1, Ifit2, Ifit3), ubiquitin-like protein ISG15 (ISG15), might be due to the fact that both dinucleotides promote the production of interferons, which induce the expression of many proteins. However, there were also other proteins that were differentially affected by cGAMP or c-di-GMP treatment, including probable ATP-dependent RNA helicase DHX58 (Dhx58), nuclear autoantigen Sp-100 (Sp100), MARCKS-related protein (Marcksl1) and antigen peptide transporter 2 (Tap2). This is probably due to the differential levels of IFNs produced by the dinucleotides or may indicate that non-STING activation might also contribute to the host's response to c-di-GMP and cGAMP. Interestingly Trex1, a nuclease that degrades DNA (an activator of cGAS to produce cGAMP), was upregulated (3.22 fold) upon cGAMP treatment, hinting at a possible feedback loop to regulate cGAMP synthesis. These results lay a foundation for future studies to better characterize and understand the complex c-di-GMP and cGAMP signaling network.
蛋白质组的全局和定量分析有助于揭示宿主细胞如何感知入侵细菌并对细菌信号分子作出反应。在此,我们对用宿主来源的cGAMP和细菌来源的c-di-GMP处理的RAW巨噬细胞进行了无标记定量蛋白质组分析,试图确定受这些二核苷酸影响的细胞途径,并确定宿主对这两种环二核苷酸的反应是否存在差异。我们总共鉴定出3811种蛋白质,其中与对照相比,cGAMP处理细胞中有404种蛋白质以及c-di-GMP处理细胞中有236种蛋白质的丰度存在显著差异。许多被强烈且共同上调的蛋白质,如干扰素诱导蛋白47、202和204(Ifi47、Ifi202、Ifi204)、泛素激活酶E7(Uba7)、含四肽重复序列的干扰素诱导蛋白1、2或3(Ifit1、Ifit2、Ifit3)、泛素样蛋白ISG15(ISG15),可能是因为这两种二核苷酸都促进干扰素的产生,而干扰素会诱导许多蛋白质的表达。然而,也有其他蛋白质受到cGAMP或c-di-GMP处理的不同影响,包括可能的ATP依赖性RNA解旋酶DHX58(Dhx58)、核自身抗原Sp-100(Sp100)、MARCKS相关蛋白(Marcksl1)和抗原肽转运体2(Tap2)。这可能是由于二核苷酸产生的干扰素水平不同,或者可能表明非STING激活也可能有助于宿主对c-di-GMP和cGAMP的反应。有趣的是,Trex1(一种降解DNA的核酸酶,是cGAS产生cGAMP的激活剂)在cGAMP处理后上调(3.22倍),这暗示了可能存在一个调节cGAMP合成的反馈回路。这些结果为未来更好地表征和理解复杂的c-di-GMP和cGAMP信号网络的研究奠定了基础。