• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019 年冠状病毒疾病瑞典网站的易读性、可理解性和语言可及性:一项横断面研究。

Readability, understandability and language accessibility of Swedish websites about the coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

The Swedish Red Cross University, Huddinge, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 13;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01873-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-022-01873-y
PMID:35562701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9103604/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality. To mitigate its spread, members in the general population were prompted to apply significant behavioral changes. This required an effective dissemination of understandable information accessible for people with a wide range of literacy backgrounds. The aim of this study was to investigate the readability, understandability and language accessibility of Swedish consumer-oriented websites containing information about COVID-19.

METHODS

Websites were identified through systematic searches in Google.se (n = 76), and were collected in May 2020 when the pandemic spread started in Sweden. Readability and understandability were assessed with the Readability Index, the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool Understandability subscale (PEMAT-PU).

RESULTS

The median total sample score for Readability Index was 42.0, with the majority of scores being classified as moderate (n = 30, 39%) or difficult (n = 43, 57%). Median total sample scores were for EQIP 54.0% (IQR = 17.0, Range = 8-75) and for PEMAT-PU 60.0% (IQR = 14.75, Range = 12-87). The majority of the websites did not have any texts or links containing information in an alternative language (n = 58, 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

Swedish websites contained information of difficult readability and understandability at the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, with few providing information available in alternative languages. It is possible that these deficits contributed to the spread and impact of the virus. There is a need for studies investigating methods aiming to enhance the readability, understandability and language accessibility of web-based information at the beginning of an epidemic or pandemic.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行造成了重大的发病率和死亡率。为了减轻其传播,普通人群成员被要求采取重大的行为改变。这需要有效地传播易懂的信息,让具有广泛文化程度背景的人都能获取。本研究的目的是调查含有 COVID-19 信息的瑞典面向消费者的网站的可读性、可理解性和语言可及性。

方法

通过在 Google.se 中进行系统搜索(n=76)确定了网站,并于 2020 年 5 月收集,当时 COVID-19 在瑞典开始传播。使用可读性指数、确保患者获得高质量信息(EQIP)工具和患者教育材料评估工具理解分量表(PEMAT-PU)评估可读性和可理解性。

结果

Readability Index 的中位数总样本得分为 42.0,其中大多数分数被归类为中等(n=30,39%)或困难(n=43,57%)。EQIP 的中位数总样本得分为 54.0%(IQR=17.0,范围=8-75),PEMAT-PU 的中位数总样本得分为 60.0%(IQR=14.75,范围=12-87)。大多数网站没有任何包含替代语言信息的文本或链接(n=58,76%)。

结论

在冠状病毒病 2019 大流行开始时,瑞典网站的信息可读性和可理解性较差,很少提供替代语言的信息。这些缺陷可能导致了病毒的传播和影响。在大流行或大流行开始时,需要研究旨在提高基于网络的信息的可读性、可理解性和语言可及性的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4003/9107225/522111f975c4/12911_2022_1873_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4003/9107225/522111f975c4/12911_2022_1873_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4003/9107225/522111f975c4/12911_2022_1873_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Readability, understandability and language accessibility of Swedish websites about the coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study.2019 年冠状病毒疾病瑞典网站的易读性、可理解性和语言可及性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 13;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01873-y.
2
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
3
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.评估关于儿童胸痛的在线资料的可读性、可理解性和质量。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Dec;179(12):1881-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03772-8. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Are English-language online patient education materials related to breast cancer risk assessment understandable, readable, and actionable?英文在线患者教育材料与乳腺癌风险评估相关的内容是否易于理解、阅读和付诸行动?
Breast. 2022 Feb;61:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
6
Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States.美国学术医学中心的 COVID-19 患者教育材料的可读性、内容和质量。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):690-693. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.023. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
7
Web-Based Patient Educational Material on Osteosarcoma: Quantitative Assessment of Readability and Understandability.基于网络的骨肉瘤患者教育材料:可读性与可理解性的定量评估
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Mar 24;8(1):e25005. doi: 10.2196/25005.
8
Evaluating online patient education materials for liver cirrhosis.评估肝硬化的在线患者教育资料。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;193(4):1799-1806. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03645-1. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
9
Readability, understandability, and quality of retinopathy of prematurity information on the web.早产儿视网膜病变相关信息在网络上的易读性、理解度和质量。
Birth Defects Res. 2021 Jul 15;113(12):901-910. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1883. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
10
An evaluation of readability and understandability of online education materials for breast cancer survivors.评估乳腺癌幸存者在线教育材料的可读性和可理解性。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Apr;18(2):457-465. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01240-w. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating understandability and actionability of online education materials for home-care patients with COVID-19 in Japan.评估日本 COVID-19 居家患者在线教育材料的易懂性和可操作性。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Oct 25;16(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06570-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality in Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic.挪威和瑞典在 COVID-19 大流行期间的死亡率。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Feb;50(1):38-45. doi: 10.1177/14034948211047137. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
Spatial clustering and contextual factors associated with hospitalisation and deaths due to COVID-19 in Sweden: a geospatial nationwide ecological study.与瑞典 COVID-19 住院和死亡相关的空间集聚和背景因素:一项全国范围的地理空间生态研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006247.
3
An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information on COVID-19.
关于新冠病毒病在线信息的质量与可读性的客观分析。
Health Technol (Berl). 2021;11(5):1093-1099. doi: 10.1007/s12553-021-00574-2. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Quality of web-based information at the beginning of a global pandemic: a cross-sectional infodemiology study investigating preventive measures and self care methods of the coronavirus disease 2019.全球大流行初期的网络信息质量:一项横断面信息流行病学研究,调查 2019 年冠状病毒病的预防措施和自我保健方法。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 14;21(1):1141. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11141-9.
5
Engaging the vulnerable: A rapid review of public health communication aimed at migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe.关注弱势群体:对欧洲新冠疫情期间针对移民的公共卫生宣传的快速回顾
J Migr Health. 2020;1:100004. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2020.100004. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care?新冠疫情健康网站:它们是否足够易于阅读且值得信赖,从而能帮助公众进行自我护理?
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):75-83. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1020.
7
Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States.美国学术医学中心的 COVID-19 患者教育材料的可读性、内容和质量。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):690-693. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.023. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Internet Use in Old Age: Results of a German Population-Representative Survey.老年人使用互联网:一项德国代表性人口调查的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 23;22(11):e15543. doi: 10.2196/15543.
9
Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.在线 COVID-19 健康信息的易读性:四个英语国家之间的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;20(1):1635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5.
10
The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway and Sweden - threats, trust, and impact on daily life: a comparative survey.挪威和瑞典的 COVID-19 大流行——威胁、信任以及对日常生活的影响:一项比较调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 23;20(1):1597. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09615-3.