Department of Community Medicine, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 13;22(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13366-8.
In studies of social inequalities in health, there is no consensus on the best measure of socioeconomic position (SEP). Moreover, subjective indicators are increasingly used to measure SEP. The aim of this paper was to develop a composite score for SEP based on weighted combinations of education and income in estimating subjective SEP, and examine how this score performs in predicting inequalities in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
We used data from a comprehensive health survey from Northern Norway, conducted in 2015/16 (N = 21,083). A composite SEP score was developed using adjacent-category logistic regression of subjective SEP as a function of four education and four household income levels. Weights were derived based on these indicators' coefficients in explaining variations in respondents' subjective SEP. The composite SEP score was further applied to predict inequalities in HRQoL, measured by the EQ-5D and a visual analogue scale.
Education seemed to influence SEP the most, while income added weight primarily for the highest income category. The weights demonstrated clear non-linearities, with large jumps from the middle to the higher SEP score levels. Analyses of the composite SEP score indicated a clear social gradient in both HRQoL measures.
We provide new insights into the relative contribution of education and income as sources of SEP, both separately and in combination. Combining education and income into a composite SEP score produces more comprehensive estimates of the social gradient in health. A similar approach can be applied in any cohort study that includes education and income data.
在研究健康方面的社会不平等问题时,对于衡量社会经济地位(SEP)的最佳指标尚未达成共识。此外,人们越来越多地使用主观指标来衡量 SEP。本文的目的是基于教育和收入的加权组合,为主观 SEP 构建一个 SEP 综合评分,并检验该评分在预测与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)不平等方面的表现。
我们使用了来自挪威北部一项综合健康调查的数据,该调查于 2015/16 年进行(N=21083)。使用相邻类别逻辑回归将主观 SEP 作为四个教育和四个家庭收入水平的函数,构建了一个综合 SEP 评分。权重是根据这些指标在解释受访者主观 SEP 差异方面的系数得出的。然后将综合 SEP 评分进一步应用于预测 HRQoL 的不平等,使用 EQ-5D 和视觉模拟量表进行衡量。
教育似乎对 SEP 的影响最大,而收入则主要为最高收入类别增加了权重。权重表现出明显的非线性,从中等到更高的 SEP 评分水平有较大的跳跃。对综合 SEP 评分的分析表明,两种 HRQoL 测量方法都存在明显的社会梯度。
我们提供了有关教育和收入作为 SEP 来源的相对贡献的新见解,无论是单独使用还是组合使用。将教育和收入合并为一个综合 SEP 评分可以更全面地估计健康方面的社会梯度。类似的方法可以应用于任何包含教育和收入数据的队列研究中。