Suppr超能文献

用于区分丁丙诺啡和芬太尼对健康志愿者影响的简易装置。

Simple devices in differentiating the effects of buprenorphine and fentanyl in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Manner T, Kanto J, Salonen M

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;31(6):673-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00541294.

Abstract

We have tested the usefulness of the critical flicker fusion threshold-test (CFF), Maddox wing readings (MW), and visual analogue scale scores (VAS) in a double-blind, random-order study designed to evaluate the clinical effects of two different kinds of opiates, buprenorphine and fentanyl in comparison with those of placebo. The results were compared with the so-called postanaesthetic recovery score (PARS). In 7 healthy volunteers MW and VAS differentiated the effects of buprenorphine 7.5 micrograms/kg i.v. from those of fentanyl 2.5 micrograms/kg i.v. and placebo. CFF was very insensitive in this respect and PARS completely useless. Our results show that, in addition to the known usefulness of VAS, MW is also able to differentiate the effects of these opiates.

摘要

我们在一项双盲、随机顺序研究中测试了临界闪烁融合阈值测试(CFF)、马多克斯翼测量值(MW)和视觉模拟量表评分(VAS)的有效性,该研究旨在评估两种不同阿片类药物丁丙诺啡和芬太尼与安慰剂相比的临床效果。将结果与所谓的麻醉后恢复评分(PARS)进行比较。在7名健康志愿者中,MW和VAS能够区分静脉注射7.5微克/千克丁丙诺啡与静脉注射2.5微克/千克芬太尼及安慰剂的效果。CFF在这方面非常不敏感,而PARS则完全无用。我们的结果表明,除了VAS已知的有效性外,MW也能够区分这些阿片类药物的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验