• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直线和斜线正手攻球在竞技乒乓球中的生物力学比较。

Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.

Department of Exercise Science, School of Physical Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 23;19(9):5146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095146.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19095146
PMID:35564541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9102447/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the kinematic and kinetic differences of the racket arm when balls were hit cross-court (CC) and down the line (DL) by topspin backhand. Eight elite female players participated and were instructed to hit the ball down the line and cross-court using a topspin backhand. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected. The results show that at the impact, participants had a greater wrist flexion angle in DL than CC ( = 0.017). The angular velocity of shoulder flexion ( = 0.038), shoulder abduction ( = 0.006) and thorax-pelvis internal rotation ( = 0.017) was faster when participants impacted the ball DL than CC. As for the joint kinetics, the shoulder external rotation moment was greater in CC than DL ( = 0.043). For a high-quality DL technique, it is important to exhibit a greater wrist flexion and have faster adduction and flexion in the shoulder, as well as faster internal rotation in thorax-pelvis, while having a smaller wrist flexion and more external rotation power in the shoulder are important to perform a CC at the impact. If these key and different factors of hitting CC and DL are ignored, it may lead to failure to complete a high-quality shot.

摘要

本研究旨在比较正手抽击球时,横击球和直线球的挥拍手臂运动学和动力学差异。八名优秀的女性参与者被要求用正手抽击球打出直线球和斜线球。采集运动学和动力学数据。结果表明,在击球瞬间,参与者在直线击球时的手腕屈曲角度大于斜线击球( = 0.017)。直线击球时,肩部前屈角速度( = 0.038)、肩部外展角速度( = 0.006)和胸廓-骨盆内旋角速度( = 0.017)均快于斜线击球。在关节动力学方面,直线击球时肩部外旋力矩大于斜线击球( = 0.043)。为了实现高质量的直线击球技术,重要的是在击球瞬间展现更大的手腕屈曲角度,以及更快的肩部内收和前屈,以及更快的胸廓-骨盆内旋,而在肩部保持较小的手腕屈曲角度和更多的外旋力量则对完成斜线击球至关重要。如果忽略这些击打直线球和斜线球的关键和不同因素,可能会导致无法完成高质量的击球。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/24d1365eefd0/ijerph-19-05146-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/114994765208/ijerph-19-05146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/dcaf07acabec/ijerph-19-05146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/837a87297db2/ijerph-19-05146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/80b7310c6153/ijerph-19-05146-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/9760788f3f9f/ijerph-19-05146-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/02b462315cdd/ijerph-19-05146-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/b9968a65246e/ijerph-19-05146-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/83bf0d7d3106/ijerph-19-05146-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/db1c6628c254/ijerph-19-05146-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/ec539e2396ca/ijerph-19-05146-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/85769eaa1b92/ijerph-19-05146-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/a2172d75b7b0/ijerph-19-05146-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/ebc1909a67a2/ijerph-19-05146-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/24d1365eefd0/ijerph-19-05146-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/114994765208/ijerph-19-05146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/dcaf07acabec/ijerph-19-05146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/837a87297db2/ijerph-19-05146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/80b7310c6153/ijerph-19-05146-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/9760788f3f9f/ijerph-19-05146-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/02b462315cdd/ijerph-19-05146-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/b9968a65246e/ijerph-19-05146-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/83bf0d7d3106/ijerph-19-05146-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/db1c6628c254/ijerph-19-05146-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/ec539e2396ca/ijerph-19-05146-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/85769eaa1b92/ijerph-19-05146-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/a2172d75b7b0/ijerph-19-05146-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/ebc1909a67a2/ijerph-19-05146-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed37/9102447/24d1365eefd0/ijerph-19-05146-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Comparison between Down-the-Line and Cross-Court Topspin Backhand in Competitive Table Tennis.直线和斜线正手攻球在竞技乒乓球中的生物力学比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 23;19(9):5146. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095146.
2
Kinematic Comparisons of the Shakehand and Penhold Grips in Table Tennis Forehand and Backhand Strokes when Returning Topspin and Backspin Balls.乒乓球正、反手攻球时横拍和直拍“削球”与“拉球”技术的运动学比较。
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Nov 19;19(4):637-644. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Correlations between Angular Velocities in Selected Joints and Velocity of Table Tennis Racket during Topspin Forehand and Backhand.选定关节角速度与乒乓球正手和反手攻球时球拍速度的相关性。
J Sports Sci Med. 2018 May 14;17(2):330-338. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Gender Differences in Kinematic Parameters of Topspin Forehand and Backhand in Table Tennis.乒乓球正手和反手攻球动作的运动学参数的性别差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 8;17(16):5742. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165742.
5
A kinematic comparison between long-line and cross-court top spin forehand in competitive table tennis players.竞技乒乓球运动员长球和斜线高吊正手攻球的运动学比较。
J Sports Sci. 2018 Dec;36(23):2637-2643. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1456394. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
6
Effect of the racket mass and the rate of strokes on kinematics and kinetics in the table tennis topspin backhand.球拍质量和击球速率对乒乓球上旋反手击球运动学和动力学的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2016;34(8):721-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1069377. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
7
Mechanical energy generation and transfer in the racket arm during table tennis topspin backhands.乒乓球上旋反手击球时球拍手臂中的机械能产生与传递
Sports Biomech. 2016 Jun;15(2):180-97. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1159722. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
The kinematics of table tennis racquet: differences between topspin strokes.乒乓球拍的运动学:上旋击球之间的差异。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Mar;57(3):202-213. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06104-1. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
9
Statistical Parametric Mapping Reveals Subtle Gender Differences in Angular Movements in Table Tennis Topspin Backhand.统计参数映射揭示乒乓球上旋反手击球中角度运动的细微性别差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;17(19):6996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17196996.
10
Evaluation of Upper Limb Joint Contribution to Racket Head Speed in Elite Tennis Players Using IMU Sensors: Comparison between the Cross-Court and Inside-Out Attacking Forehand Drive.利用 IMU 传感器评估优秀网球运动员球拍头速的上肢关节贡献:对比横向和内收攻击正手驱动。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;22(3):1283. doi: 10.3390/s22031283.

引用本文的文献

1
Lumbar and pelvis movement comparison between cross-court and long-line topspin forehand in table tennis: based on musculoskeletal model.乒乓球横拍和直拍上旋正手击球时腰部与骨盆运动的比较:基于肌肉骨骼模型
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 19;11:1185177. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1185177. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Kinematic Comparisons of the Shakehand and Penhold Grips in Table Tennis Forehand and Backhand Strokes when Returning Topspin and Backspin Balls.乒乓球正、反手攻球时横拍和直拍“削球”与“拉球”技术的运动学比较。
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Nov 19;19(4):637-644. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Wearable Wheelchair Mobility Performance Measurement in Basketball, Rugby, and Tennis: Lessons for Classification and Training.可穿戴轮椅在篮球、橄榄球和网球中的移动性能测量:分类和训练的启示。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 21;20(12):3518. doi: 10.3390/s20123518.
3
Comparative Study of Kinematics and Muscle Activity Between Elite and Amateur Table Tennis Players During Topspin Loop Against Backspin Movements.
专业乒乓球运动员与业余乒乓球运动员在对下旋球进行上旋弧圈球回击动作时的运动学和肌肉活动对比研究
J Hum Kinet. 2018 Oct 15;64:25-33. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0182. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
Sex-related differences in coordination and variability among foot joints during running.跑步过程中足部关节协调性和变异性的性别差异。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Sep 17;11:53. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0295-9. eCollection 2018.
5
Comparing the biomechanical characteristics between squat and standing serves in female table tennis athletes.比较女性乒乓球运动员深蹲和站立时的生物力学特征。
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 1;6:e4760. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4760. eCollection 2018.
6
Correlations between Angular Velocities in Selected Joints and Velocity of Table Tennis Racket during Topspin Forehand and Backhand.选定关节角速度与乒乓球正手和反手攻球时球拍速度的相关性。
J Sports Sci Med. 2018 May 14;17(2):330-338. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
A kinematic comparison between long-line and cross-court top spin forehand in competitive table tennis players.竞技乒乓球运动员长球和斜线高吊正手攻球的运动学比较。
J Sports Sci. 2018 Dec;36(23):2637-2643. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1456394. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
The Evaluation of Changes of Angles in Selected Joints During Topspin Forehand in Table Tennis.乒乓球正手攻球时特定关节角度变化的评估
Motor Control. 2018 Jul 1;22(3):314-337. doi: 10.1123/mc.2017-0057. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Estimating Putting Outcomes in Golf: Experts Have a Better Sense of Distance.评估高尔夫球的推杆结果:专家对距离有更好的感知。
Percept Mot Skills. 2018 Apr;125(2):313-328. doi: 10.1177/0031512518754467. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
10
Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit in table tennis players.乒乓球运动员盂肱关节内旋不足。
J Sports Sci. 2018 Dec;36(23):2632-2636. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1392072. Epub 2017 Oct 17.