• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价清迈大学肠套叠复位失败评分(CMUI)的时间验证。

Temporal Validation of Chiang Mai University Intussusception Failed Reduction Score (CMUI).

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

Center of Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistic, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095289.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19095289
PMID:35564684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9102458/
Abstract

This study aimed to validate the "Chiang Mai University Intussusception Failed Score (CMUI)" for intussusception non-operative reduction. Both a 2-year retrospective and a 5-year prospective consecutive review of patients with intussusception were conducted. Data were collected from January 2013 to December 2020. Related retrospective data of a developmental set from two centers from January 2006 to December 2012 were used. Ten prespecified prognostic factors for failed reduction were collected and from these a predictive score was calculated. The actual results of non-operative reduction were collected and set as a reference standard. Altogether, 195 episodes of intussusception were found. Twenty-two patients were excluded due to contraindications; therefore, a total of 173 episodes were included in the validation dataset. The development data set comprised 170 episodes. We found that no statistical significance was found from comparing the areas under the ROC of two datasets (-value = 0.31), while specificity of the validation set was 93.8% (88.1-97.3). This temporal validation showed a high specificity and a high affinity for prediction of failed reduction as the development dataset despite being in an era of a higher successful reduction rate. The intensive reduction protocols might be introduced among patients with high-risk scores.

摘要

本研究旨在验证 Chiang Mai University Intussusception Failed Score(CMUI)在肠套叠非手术复位中的有效性。对 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间患有肠套叠的患者进行了为期 2 年的回顾性研究和 5 年的前瞻性连续回顾研究。收集了与发展数据集相关的回顾性数据,该数据集来自两个中心,时间为 2006 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月。共收集了 10 个与失败复位相关的预后因素,并从这些因素中计算出预测评分。收集非手术复位的实际结果作为参考标准。总共发现了 195 例肠套叠。由于存在禁忌症,有 22 例患者被排除在外;因此,共有 173 例被纳入验证数据集。发展数据集包含 170 例。我们发现,比较两个数据集的 ROC 曲线下面积没有统计学意义(-值=0.31),而验证数据集的特异性为 93.8%(88.1-97.3)。尽管处于更高的成功复位率时代,但该时间验证显示出了高特异性和高预测失败复位的亲和力。高危评分患者可能会采用强化复位方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/90b75db9280c/ijerph-19-05289-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/035e49369511/ijerph-19-05289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/12516fcfa21e/ijerph-19-05289-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/1f1c6a471cec/ijerph-19-05289-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/c333b9e11523/ijerph-19-05289-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/0110753b3bb9/ijerph-19-05289-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/5c55f570f818/ijerph-19-05289-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/90b75db9280c/ijerph-19-05289-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/035e49369511/ijerph-19-05289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/12516fcfa21e/ijerph-19-05289-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/1f1c6a471cec/ijerph-19-05289-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/c333b9e11523/ijerph-19-05289-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/0110753b3bb9/ijerph-19-05289-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/5c55f570f818/ijerph-19-05289-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/006d/9102458/90b75db9280c/ijerph-19-05289-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Temporal Validation of Chiang Mai University Intussusception Failed Reduction Score (CMUI).评价清迈大学肠套叠复位失败评分(CMUI)的时间验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095289.
2
Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception.肠套叠非手术复位失败的临床预测规则。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Sep 13;12:1411-1416. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S115253. eCollection 2016.
3
A comparison of the success rate of pneumatic reduction in intussusception between general anesthesia and deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial.全麻与深镇静下肠套叠空气灌肠复位成功率的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Apr 25;39(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05474-2.
4
Prognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusception.肠套叠非手术复位失败的预后指标。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Aug 9;12:1231-7. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S109785. eCollection 2016.
5
Enema reduction of intussusception: the success rate of hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction.灌肠复位肠套叠:水压复位和气压复位的成功率。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Dec 15;11:1837-42. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S92169. eCollection 2015.
6
Childhood intussusception: A prospective study of management trend in a developing country.儿童肠套叠:发展中国家管理趋势的前瞻性研究。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015 Oct-Dec;12(4):217-20. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.172541.
7
Pediatric intussusception and early discharge after pneumatic reduction.小儿肠套叠与空气灌肠复位后的早期出院
Acta Chir Belg. 2019 Jun;119(3):162-165. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1487190. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
8
Clinical characteristics of recurrent intussusception: A single-center retrospective study.复发性肠套叠的临床特征:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Oct;56(10):1831-1834. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.03.051. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
9
Risk factors for recurrence of intussusception in pediatric patients: A retrospective study.小儿肠套叠复发的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Nov;53(11):2307-2311. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
10
A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients.小儿肠套叠空气灌肠复位与水压灌肠复位的随机试验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Aug;53(8):1464-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a nomogram for predicting surgical intervention in pediatric intussusception after hydrostatic reduction.开发一种用于预测小儿肠套叠水压复位后手术干预的列线图。
Front Pediatr. 2023 May 31;11:1092548. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1092548. eCollection 2023.
2
A comparison of the success rate of pneumatic reduction in intussusception between general anesthesia and deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial.全麻与深镇静下肠套叠空气灌肠复位成功率的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Apr 25;39(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05474-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Age distribution and mortality associated with intussusception in children under two years of age in nine sentinel surveillance hospitals in Zambia, 2007-2018.2007-2018 年赞比亚 9 家哨点监测医院 2 岁以下儿童肠套叠的年龄分布和死亡率。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jul 28;39(Suppl 1):6. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2021.39.1.26671. eCollection 2021.
2
Intussusception among infants in Tanzania: findings from prospective hospital-based surveillance, 2013-2016.坦桑尼亚婴儿肠套叠:2013-2016 年基于医院前瞻性监测的结果。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jul 28;39(Suppl 1):4. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2021.39.1.21358. eCollection 2021.
3
Management of ileocolic intussusception in the Czech Republic.
捷克共和国回肠-结肠型肠套叠的治疗。
Rozhl Chir. 2021 Summer;100(7):339-347. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2021.100.7.339-347.
4
Predictors of failed enema reduction in children with intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测肠套叠患儿灌肠复位失败的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8081-8097. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07935-5. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Clinical predictors and outcome of bowel resection in paediatric intussusception.小儿肠套叠肠切除术的临床预测因素和结果。
Afr Health Sci. 2020 Sep;20(3):1463-1470. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i3.52.
6
Paediatric Intussusception: A Clinical Scoring System to Predict the Risk of Operative Intervention.小儿肠套叠:一种预测手术干预风险的临床评分系统。
J Mother Child. 2020 Jul 29;24(1):19-23. doi: 10.34763/jmotherandchild.2020241.1934.000002.
7
Ileocolic intussusception: Predicting the probability of success of ultrasound guided saline enema from clinical and sonographic data.回结肠套叠:根据临床和超声数据预测超声引导下盐水灌肠成功的概率。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.050. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
Success rate of pneumatic reduction of intussusception with and without sedation.有镇静和无镇静情况下肠套叠空气灌肠复位的成功率。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Feb;27(2):190-195. doi: 10.1111/pan.13045. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
Clinical prediction rules for failed nonoperative reduction of intussusception.肠套叠非手术复位失败的临床预测规则。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Sep 13;12:1411-1416. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S115253. eCollection 2016.
10
Prognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusception.肠套叠非手术复位失败的预后指标。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Aug 9;12:1231-7. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S109785. eCollection 2016.