State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095443.
Urban and suburban PM samples were collected simultaneously during selected periods representing each season in 2019 in Zibo, China. Samples were analysed for water-soluble inorganic ions, carbon components, and elements. A chemical mass balance model and health risk assessment model were used to investigate the source contributions to PM and the human health risks posed by various pollution sources via the inhalation pathway. Almost 50% of the PM samples exceeded the secondary standard of China's air quality concentration limit (75 µg/m, 24 h). Water-soluble inorganic ions were the main component of PM in Zibo, accounting for 50 ± 8% and 56 ± 11% of PM at the urban and suburban sites, respectively. OC and OC/EC decreased significantly in the past few years due to enhanced energy restructuring. Pearson correlation analysis showed that traffic emissions were the main source of heavy metals. The Cr(VI) concentrations were 1.53 and 1.92 ng/m for urban and suburban sites, respectively, exceeding the national ambient air quality standards limit of 0.025 ng/m. Secondary inorganic aerosols, traffic emissions, and secondary organic aerosols were the dominant contributors to PM in Zibo, with the total contributions from these three sources accounting for approximately 80% of PM and the remaining 20% attributed to traffic emissions. The non-carcinogenic risks from crustal dust for children were 2.23 and 1.15 in urban and suburban areas, respectively, exceeding the safe limit of 1.0 in both locations, as was the case for adults in urban areas. Meanwhile, the carcinogenic risks were all below the safe limit, with the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks from traffic emissions being just below the limits. Strict control of precursor emissions, such as SO, NOx, and VOCs, is a good way to reduce PM pollution resulting from secondary aerosols. Traffic control, limiting or preventing outdoor activities, and wearing masks during haze episodes may be also helpful in reducing PM pollution and its non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health impacts in Zibo.
在中国淄博,于 2019 年各季节分别选取有代表性的时段,同步采集城区和城乡结合部 PM 样品。对采集的 PM 样品进行水溶性无机离子、碳组分和元素分析。采用化学质量平衡模型和健康风险评估模型,研究 PM 各污染源的贡献和不同污染源通过吸入途径对人体健康的风险。约 50%的 PM 样品超过中国空气质量浓度限值(75µg/m3,24 小时)的二级标准。水溶性无机离子是淄博 PM 的主要成分,城区和城乡结合部 PM 中分别占 50±8%和 56±11%。过去几年,由于能源结构的调整,OC 和 OC/EC 显著下降。皮尔逊相关分析表明,交通排放是重金属的主要来源。城区和城乡结合部 Cr(VI)浓度分别为 1.53 和 1.92ng/m3,均超过国家环境空气质量标准限值 0.025ng/m3。二次无机气溶胶、交通排放和二次有机气溶胶是淄博 PM 的主要贡献源,这三种来源对 PM 的总贡献约占 80%,其余 20%归因于交通排放。城区儿童的地壳尘非致癌风险分别为 2.23 和 1.15,均超过两地的 1.0 安全限值,城区成年人也存在这种情况。同时,致癌风险均低于安全限值,交通排放的非致癌和致癌风险接近限值。严格控制 SO、NOx 和 VOCs 等前体污染物的排放,是减少二次气溶胶导致 PM 污染的有效途径。交通管制、限制或避免户外活动以及在雾霾天气时佩戴口罩,也可能有助于降低淄博的 PM 污染及其非致癌和致癌健康影响。