Liu Linlin, Zheng Bohong, Luo Chen, Bedra Komi Bernard, Masrabaye Francis
School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410018, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 5;19(9):5622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095622.
For current territory development planning in China, city center accessibility (CCA) has gained increasing attention for evaluating the expansion of urban areas. How should CCA and its differences between the automobile and public transit (PT) modes be measured? We analyzed CCA from travel time and travel cost perspectives using the travel data obtained from the Baidu Map at a 100 m × 100 m resolution. The GWR was then examined to explore the correlation between the explanatory variables and the CCA differences. Automobile-based CCA shows a concentric structure and varies with time, while PT-based CCA has an apparent linear expansion along the metro lines and fluctuates less. When measuring by travel cost instead of travel time, CCA gaps between the two modes are lessened, and the automobile's advantage is no longer evident. The distance from the metro stations has a significant positive effect on CCA differences, and the positive effect concentrates in the 3.6 km range (measured by travel time) and 2.8 km range (measured by travel cost) around the metro stations. Our study highlights the importance of multiple perspectives when comparing the accessibility of different transport modes, and the results also provide implications for policy-makers.
在中国当前的区域发展规划中,城市中心可达性(CCA)在评估城市区域扩张方面受到了越来越多的关注。应如何衡量CCA及其在汽车和公共交通(PT)模式之间的差异?我们使用从百度地图获取的分辨率为100米×100米的出行数据,从出行时间和出行成本角度分析了CCA。随后研究了地理加权回归(GWR),以探讨解释变量与CCA差异之间的相关性。基于汽车的CCA呈现出同心结构且随时间变化,而基于公共交通的CCA则沿地铁线路有明显的线性扩张且波动较小。当按出行成本而非出行时间衡量时,两种模式之间的CCA差距会减小,汽车的优势也不再明显。地铁站距离对CCA差异有显著的正向影响,且这种正向影响集中在地铁站周围出行时间3.6公里范围内和出行成本2.8公里范围内。我们的研究强调了在比较不同交通模式可达性时采用多视角的重要性,研究结果也为政策制定者提供了启示。