• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响人为差错因素的研究:以机组人员为重点。

Study on Factors That Influence Human Errors: Focused on Cabin Crew.

机构信息

School of Tourism, Hanyang University, 222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 7;19(9):5696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095696.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19095696
PMID:35565090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9100213/
Abstract

This study aims to reduce the possibility of human mistakes and accidents among airline cabin crew by identifying the cause of human errors by focusing on the importance of the causal relationship between human factors and human errors. According to statistical analysis, among the five human factors, physical fatigue, psychological stress, and the complacency of cabin crew had a positive impact on human errors. However, hurrying under time pressure and the distractions caused by external factors do not significantly affect human errors. Human errors have a negative impact on job crafting and mental health. This study analyzed the human factors influencing the cabin crew's errors and revealed the importance of complacency, which was not covered in previous studies. Finally, the research implications, limitations, and future studies were discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在通过关注人为因素与人为失误之间的因果关系的重要性,来降低航空公司机组人员人为失误和事故的可能性。根据统计分析,在五个人为因素中,身体疲劳、心理压力和机组人员的自满对人为失误有正向影响。然而,时间压力下的匆忙和外部因素造成的分心并不会显著影响人为失误。人为失误对工作重塑和心理健康有负面影响。本研究分析了影响机组人员失误的人为因素,并揭示了之前研究中未涵盖的自满的重要性。最后,讨论了研究的意义、局限性和未来的研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/7e36d40d80f9/ijerph-19-05696-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/6d348b503c0b/ijerph-19-05696-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/952480fbcdd2/ijerph-19-05696-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/6be85cc170ac/ijerph-19-05696-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/7e36d40d80f9/ijerph-19-05696-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/6d348b503c0b/ijerph-19-05696-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/952480fbcdd2/ijerph-19-05696-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/6be85cc170ac/ijerph-19-05696-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3010/9100213/7e36d40d80f9/ijerph-19-05696-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Study on Factors That Influence Human Errors: Focused on Cabin Crew.影响人为差错因素的研究:以机组人员为重点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 7;19(9):5696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095696.
2
Airline Cabin Crew Team System's Positive Evaluation Factors and Their Impact on Personal Health and Team Potency.航空公司客舱机组团队系统的积极评估因素及其对个人健康和团队效能的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 6;18(19):10480. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910480.
3
MBTI Personality Types of Korean Cabin Crew in Middle Eastern Airlines, and Their Associations with Cross-Cultural Adjustment Competency, Occupational Competency, Coping Competency, Mental Health, and Turnover Intention.中东地区航空公司韩国籍机组人员的 MBTI 人格类型,及其与跨文化适应能力、职业能力、应对能力、心理健康和离职意向的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073419.
4
Health and perception of cabin air quality among Swedish commercial airline crew.瑞典商业航空公司机组人员的健康状况与机舱空气质量感知
Indoor Air. 2005;15 Suppl 10:65-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00353.x.
5
The Effect of Psychological Anxiety Caused by COVID-19 on Job Self-Esteem and Job Satisfaction of Airline Flight Attendants.新冠疫情导致的心理焦虑对航空公司空乘人员职业自尊和职业满意度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;19(7):4043. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074043.
6
Strategies to Improve Work Attitude and Mental Health of Problem Employees: Focusing on Airline Cabin Crew.改善问题员工工作态度和心理健康的策略:以航空公司机组人员为重点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;19(2):768. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020768.
7
Influence of Airline Cabin Crew Members' Rapport-Building Behaviors and Empathy toward Colleagues on Team Performance, Organizational Atmosphere, and Irregularity.航空公司客舱机组人员的建立关系行为和对同事的同理心对团队绩效、组织氛围和违规行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 13;18(12):6417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126417.
8
Subjective health complaints, work-related stress and self-efficacy in Norwegian aircrew.挪威机组人员的主观健康投诉、与工作相关的压力和自我效能。
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Mar 1;67(2):135-142. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw127.
9
Irregular working hours and fatigue of cabin crew.机组人员工作时间不规律及疲劳。
Work. 2015;51(3):505-11. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141877.
10
Cabin crew stress factors examined.空乘人员压力因素研究。
ICAO J. 1991 May;46(5):9-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of word list length during episodic memory encoding observation by the event-related potential and time-frequency.事件相关电位和时频观察下,情节记忆编码过程中单词列表长度的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Apr 22;19:1542289. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1542289. eCollection 2025.
2
A lightweight speech recognition method with target-swap knowledge distillation for Mandarin air traffic control communications.一种用于普通话空中交通管制通信的具有目标交换知识蒸馏的轻量级语音识别方法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Nov 1;9:e1650. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1650. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Personal and Work Factors That Predict Fatigue-Related Errors in Aircraft Maintenance Engineering.预测飞机维修工程中与疲劳相关错误的个人因素和工作因素。
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019 Oct 1;90(10):860-866. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5000.2019.
2
Measuring slips and lapses when they occur - ambulatory assessment in application to cognitive failures.在失误和疏忽发生时进行测量——应用于认知失误的动态评估。
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Feb;24:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
3
Everyday attention failures: an individual differences investigation.
日常注意力失败:个体差异研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1765-72. doi: 10.1037/a0028075. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
4
Fatigue risk management: Organizational factors at the regulatory and industry/company level.疲劳风险管理:监管和行业/公司层面的组织因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Mar;43(2):573-90. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.007.
5
Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.人类在使用自动化时的自满和偏见:注意力的综合。
Hum Factors. 2010 Jun;52(3):381-410. doi: 10.1177/0018720810376055.
6
Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?道路上的错误和违规:真正的区别?
Ergonomics. 1990 Oct-Nov;33(10-11):1315-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139008925335.
7
HSE management standards and stress-related work outcomes.HSE 管理标准与应激相关工作结果。
Occup Med (Lond). 2009 Dec;59(8):574-9. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp146. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
8
Stress hormones: physiological stress and regulation of metabolism.应激激素:生理应激与代谢调节。
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;9(6):787-93. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.08.007. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
9
Fatigue in pilots of remotely piloted aircraft before and after shift work adjustment.遥控飞机飞行员轮班工作调整前后的疲劳状况
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 May;80(5):454-61. doi: 10.3357/asem.2455.2009.
10
Medication errors: the human factor.用药差错:人为因素。
CMAJ. 2008 Jan 1;178(1):63-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071658.