Birolo Marco, Trocino Angela, Zuffellato Andrea, Pirrone Fabrizio, Bordignon Francesco, Xiccato Gerolamo
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animal and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Padova, Italy.
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science (BCA), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Padova, Italy.
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 8;12(9):1212. doi: 10.3390/ani12091212.
To improve animal welfare in collective park housing systems, this study assessed the effects of the provision of gnawing hay blocks and the group composition (F: females, M: males, FM: mixed sex) on performance, behavior, and reactivity of 288 growing rabbits reared in 18 parks (16 rabbits/park) from 31 to 73 days of age. The presence of gnawing blocks inside the feeding area of the parks scarcely affected performance and budget time, but decreased the time spent in the resting area compared to parks without blocks (p < 0.001); it increased the time spent moving during the open field test (p < 0.05) and the rate of rabbits that approached the object in the novel-object test (p < 0.05). As for sex-group composition, the feed conversion ratio was lower in parks F and FM than in park M (p < 0.05). During the open-field test, FM rabbits spent more time moving (p < 0.05), whereas M rabbits displayed self-grooming for a longer time (p < 0.01). Results related to production, behavior, and reactivity indicate the provision of gnawing blocks for welfare improvement, but do not support the change from current mixed-sex to single-sex rearing.
为改善集体笼养系统中的动物福利,本研究评估了提供啃咬干草块以及组群构成(F:雌性,M:雄性,FM:混合性别)对18个兔笼中288只31至73日龄生长兔的生产性能、行为和反应性的影响。每个兔笼饲养16只兔子。兔笼采食区内有啃咬块的情况对生产性能和采食时间几乎没有影响,但与没有啃咬块的兔笼相比,兔子在休息区的停留时间减少(p < 0.001);在旷场试验中,兔子移动的时间增加(p < 0.05),在新物体试验中接近物体的兔子比例增加(p < 0.05)。至于性别组群构成,F组和FM组兔笼的饲料转化率低于M组兔笼(p < 0.05)。在旷场试验中,FM组兔子移动的时间更多(p < 0.05),而M组兔子自我梳理的时间更长(p < 0.01)。与生产性能、行为和反应性相关的结果表明,提供啃咬块有助于改善福利,但不支持从当前的混合性别饲养改为单性别饲养。