Trocino Angela, Menegon Francesca, Zomeño Cristina, Pasqualin Dario, Cunial Giovanni, Xiccato Gerolamo, Pirrone Fabrizio, Bertotto Daniela, Bortoletti Martina, Dorigo Francesco, Lavazza Antonio, Di Martino Guido
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science (BCA), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animal and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 11;9:936643. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.936643. eCollection 2022.
This pilot study tested an on-farm protocol based on resource, management, and animal-based measures to evaluate the on-farm health and welfare of rabbits kept in four different housing systems. In detail, the four housing systems were (1) standard breeding cages for reproducing does (3,300 cm) with their litters associated with bicellular cages for growing rabbits (1,200 cm); (2) dual-purpose cages for both reproducing does and growing rabbits (3,655 cm); (3) enriched cages (4,739 cm) for both reproducing does and growing rabbits equipped with a wire-mesh elevated platform (1,015 cm); (4) parks (30,977 cm) made up of four modules (7,744 cm each) joined by removing the wire net walls between them with growing rabbits kept in collective parks and reproducing does individually in the single modules. A total of 12 commercial farms (three farms/four housing systems) were visited during three seasons (summer, autumn, and winter) on two occasions each: (1) a pre-weaning visit for recordings on reproducing does and litters and (2) a pre-slaughtering visit for recordings on growing rabbits. At the pre-weaning visit, the prevalence of health concerns did not differ among does and litters kept in the different housing systems. At the pre-slaughtering visit, a higher prevalence of dermatomycosis was found in farms with dual-purpose cages and parks. Overall, taking into account the limitations due to the small sample size per housing system and the field conditions, the on-farm assessment tested in the present pilot study did not highlight major differences in the welfare and health of reproducing does and their kits as well as of growing rabbits in farms using different housing systems, which need to be confirmed on a large number of farms. The study also outlined the role of several management and environmental factors changing from one farm to another, which stresses the troubles of accounting for on-farm rabbit welfare and health exclusively to the housing system.
这项试点研究测试了一种基于资源、管理和动物相关措施的农场方案,以评估饲养在四种不同养殖系统中的兔子的农场健康和福利状况。具体而言,这四种养殖系统分别为:(1)用于繁殖母兔的标准繁殖笼(3300平方厘米)及其幼崽,搭配用于生长兔的双格笼(1200平方厘米);(2)用于繁殖母兔和生长兔的两用笼(3655平方厘米);(3)用于繁殖母兔和生长兔的改良笼(4739平方厘米),配有金属丝网高架平台(1015平方厘米);(4)兔舍(30977平方厘米),由四个模块(每个7744平方厘米)组成,通过拆除它们之间的铁丝网壁连接而成,生长兔饲养在集体兔舍中,繁殖母兔单独饲养在单个模块中。在三个季节(夏季、秋季和冬季),共走访了12个商业农场(每个养殖系统三个农场),每次走访两次:(1)断奶前走访,记录繁殖母兔和幼崽的情况;(2)屠宰前走访,记录生长兔的情况。在断奶前走访中,不同养殖系统中母兔和幼崽的健康问题患病率没有差异。在屠宰前走访中,两用笼和兔舍的农场中皮肤真菌病的患病率较高。总体而言,考虑到每个养殖系统样本量较小以及现场条件的限制,本试点研究中测试的农场评估并未突出使用不同养殖系统的农场中繁殖母兔及其幼崽以及生长兔在福利和健康方面的重大差异,这需要在大量农场中得到证实。该研究还概述了几个农场之间各不相同的管理和环境因素的作用,这强调了仅将农场兔子的福利和健康归因于养殖系统的困难。