Smid Annemarie, Elting Jan Willem J, van Dijk J Marc C, Otten Bert, Oterdoom D L Marinus, Tamasi Katalin, Heida Tjitske, van Laar Teus, Drost Gea
Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 19;11(9):2275. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092275.
The most frequently used method for evaluating tremor in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is currently the internationally standardized Movement Disorder Society—Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). However, the MDS-UPDRS is associated with limitations, such as its inherent subjectivity and reliance on experienced raters. Objective motor measurements using accelerometry may overcome the shortcomings of visually scored scales. Therefore, the current study focuses on translating the MDS-UPDRS tremor tests into an objective scoring method using 3D accelerometry. An algorithm to measure and classify tremor according to MDS-UPDRS criteria is proposed. For this study, 28 PD patients undergoing neurosurgical treatment and 26 healthy control subjects were included. Both groups underwent MDS-UPDRS tests to rate tremor severity, while accelerometric measurements were performed at the index fingers. All measurements were performed in an off-medication state. Quantitative measures were calculated from the 3D acceleration data, such as tremor amplitude and area-under-the-curve of power in the 4−6 Hz range. Agreement between MDS-UPDRS tremor scores and objective accelerometric scores was investigated. The trends were consistent with the logarithmic relationship between tremor amplitude and MDS-UPDRS score reported in previous studies. The accelerometric scores showed a substantial concordance (>69.6%) with the MDS-UPDRS ratings. However, accelerometric kinetic tremor measures poorly associated with the given MDS-UPDRS scores (R2 < 0.3), mainly due to the noise between 4 and 6 Hz found in the healthy controls. This study shows that MDS-UDPRS tremor tests can be translated to objective accelerometric measurements. However, discrepancies were found between accelerometric kinetic tremor measures and MDS-UDPRS ratings. This technology has the potential to reduce rater dependency of MDS-UPDRS measurements and allow more objective intraoperative monitoring of tremor.
目前,评估帕金森病(PD)震颤最常用的方法是国际标准化的运动障碍协会统一PD评定量表(MDS - UPDRS)。然而,MDS - UPDRS存在局限性,比如其固有的主观性以及对经验丰富评分者的依赖。使用加速度计进行客观运动测量可能会克服视觉评分量表的缺点。因此,当前研究专注于将MDS - UPDRS震颤测试转化为使用三维加速度计的客观评分方法。提出了一种根据MDS - UPDRS标准测量和分类震颤的算法。本研究纳入了28例接受神经外科治疗的PD患者和26名健康对照者。两组均接受MDS - UPDRS测试以评定震颤严重程度,同时在食指进行加速度测量。所有测量均在未服药状态下进行。从三维加速度数据计算出定量指标,如震颤幅度和4 - 6赫兹范围内功率的曲线下面积。研究了MDS - UPDRS震颤评分与客观加速度评分之间的一致性。这些趋势与先前研究报道的震颤幅度和MDS - UPDRS评分之间的对数关系一致。加速度评分与MDS - UPDRS评定显示出高度一致性(>69.6%)。然而,加速度计测量的动态震颤与给定的MDS - UPDRS评分相关性较差(R2 < 0.3),主要原因是在健康对照者中发现4至6赫兹之间存在噪声。本研究表明,MDS - UDPRS震颤测试可以转化为客观的加速度测量。然而,加速度计测量的动态震颤与MDS - UDPRS评定之间存在差异。这项技术有可能减少MDS - UPDRS测量对评分者的依赖,并允许对震颤进行更客观的术中监测。