Parini Sara, Massera Fabio, Papalia Esther, Baietto Guido, Bora Giulia, Rena Ottavio
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, 28100 Novara, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2022 May 6;11(9):2612. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092612.
Despite the use of robotics becoming increasingly popular among thoracic surgeons worldwide, there remains debate over the best robotic approach for lung resections. In this paper, we delineated the main port placement strategies and discussed their advantages and disadvantages.
A PubMed literature review was performed using key phrases such as "robotic lobectomy technique", "RATS lobectomy", and "port placement robotic lobectomy". After the final review, 22 articles were included as references, of which 10 described common robotic port mapping techniques.
Several port strategies for robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomies have been proposed and described in the literature, each showing its own limitations and advantages.
New robotic surgeons may choose their port strategy according to personal preference and previous surgical experience, especially regarding open or VATS resections. Robust data comparing different port placements in robotic surgery are lacking. Further research should be directed toward comparisons of clinical outcomes with different robotic approaches.
尽管机器人技术在全球胸外科医生中越来越受欢迎，但对于肺切除的最佳机器人手术方法仍存在争议。在本文中，我们阐述了主要的端口放置策略，并讨论了它们的优缺点。
使用“机器人肺叶切除术技术”、“RATS肺叶切除术”和“端口放置机器人肺叶切除术”等关键词进行PubMed文献综述。最终评审后，纳入22篇文章作为参考文献，其中10篇描述了常见的机器人端口映射技术。
文献中提出并描述了几种机器人辅助肺叶切除术的端口策略，每种策略都有其自身的局限性和优点。
新的机器人外科医生可以根据个人偏好和以前的手术经验选择端口策略，特别是关于开放或VATS切除术。缺乏比较机器人手术中不同端口放置的有力数据。进一步的研究应针对不同机器人手术方法的临床结果比较。
