• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于信仰的干预措施在苏格兰对穆斯林妇女的定性评估,以鼓励她们接受乳腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查。

Qualitative evaluation of a codesigned faith-based intervention for Muslim women in Scotland to encourage uptake of breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK

Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 13;12(5):e058739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058739.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058739
PMID:35568495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9109091/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of a codesigned, culturally tailored, faith-based online intervention to increase uptake of breast, colorectal and cervical screening in Scottish Muslim women. The intervention was codesigned with Scottish Muslim women (n=10) and underpinned by the reframe, reprioritise and reform model and the behaviour change wheel.

SETTING

The study was conducted online, using Zoom, due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (n=18) taking part in the intervention and subsequently in its evaluation, were Muslim women residing in Scotland, recruited through purposive and snowball sampling from a mosque and community organisations. Participants were aged between 25 years and 54 years and of Asian and Arab ethnicity.

DESIGN

The study's codesigned intervention included (1) a peer-led discussion of barriers to screening, (2) a health education session led by a healthcare provider, (3) videos of Muslim women's experiences of cancer or screening, and (4) a religious perspective on cancer screening delivered by a female religious scholar (alimah). The intervention was delivered twice online in March 2021, followed 1 week later by two focus groups, consisting of the same participants, respectively, to discuss participants' experiences of the intervention. Focus group transcripts were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Participants accepted the content and delivery of the intervention and were positive about their experience of the intervention. Participants reported their knowledge of screening had increased and shared positive views towards cancer screening. They valued the multidimensional delivery of the intervention, appreciated the faith-based perspective, and in particular liked the personal stories and input from a healthcare provider.

CONCLUSION

Participatory and community-centred approaches can play an important role in tackling health inequalities in cancer and its screening. Despite limitations, the intervention showed potential and was positively received by participants. Feasibility testing is needed to investigate effectiveness on a larger scale in a full trial.

摘要

目的

本试点研究旨在评估一种经共同设计、文化调整、基于信仰的在线干预措施在苏格兰穆斯林女性中提高乳腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查参与度的可接受性。该干预措施由苏格兰穆斯林女性(n=10)共同设计,以重新规划、重新优先排序和改革模型和行为改变轮为基础。

设置

由于 COVID-19 大流行,该研究在线上进行,使用 Zoom。

参与者

参与干预措施并随后参与其评估的参与者是居住在苏格兰的穆斯林女性,通过从清真寺和社区组织进行有针对性的和滚雪球式的抽样招募。参与者年龄在 25 岁至 54 岁之间,种族为亚洲和阿拉伯裔。

设计

该研究共同设计的干预措施包括(1)一次由同行领导的关于筛查障碍的讨论,(2)由医疗保健提供者领导的健康教育课程,(3)穆斯林女性经历癌症或筛查的视频,以及(4)由女性宗教学者(alimah)提供的关于癌症筛查的宗教观点。该干预措施于 2021 年 3 月在线分两次进行,之后一周分别举行了两次焦点小组会议,由相同的参与者参加,以讨论参与者对干预措施的体验。对焦点小组的记录进行了主题分析。

结果

参与者接受了干预措施的内容和交付,并对他们的干预体验持积极态度。参与者报告说他们的筛查知识有所增加,并对癌症筛查持积极看法。他们重视干预措施的多维交付,赞赏基于信仰的观点,特别喜欢个人故事和医疗保健提供者的投入。

结论

参与式和以社区为中心的方法可以在解决癌症及其筛查方面的健康不平等方面发挥重要作用。尽管存在局限性,但该干预措施显示出了潜力,并受到了参与者的好评。需要进行可行性测试,以便在更大规模的全试验中调查其有效性。

相似文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of a codesigned faith-based intervention for Muslim women in Scotland to encourage uptake of breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening.基于信仰的干预措施在苏格兰对穆斯林妇女的定性评估,以鼓励她们接受乳腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 13;12(5):e058739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058739.
2
Using a participatory approach to encourage uptake of breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening for Scottish Muslim women: a pilot qualitative study.采用参与式方法鼓励苏格兰穆斯林妇女接受乳腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查:一项试点定性研究。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02063-9.
3
Muslim immigrant women's views on cervical cancer screening and HPV self-sampling in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省穆斯林移民女性对宫颈癌筛查和人乳头瘤病毒自我采样的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3564-1.
4
Testing a faith-placed education intervention for bowel cancer screening in Muslim communities using a two-group non-randomised mixed-methods approach: Feasibility study protocol.采用两群组非随机混合方法对穆斯林社区进行大肠癌筛检的信仰导向教育干预措施测试:可行性研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 15;19(3):e0293339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293339. eCollection 2024.
5
Perspectives on cervical cancer screening among educated Muslim women in Dubai (the UAE): a qualitative study.迪拜(阿联酋)受过教育的穆斯林女性对宫颈癌筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Oct 24;15:90. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0252-8.
6
Views of Somali women and men on the use of faith-based messages promoting breast and cervical cancer screening for Somali women: a focus-group study.索马里男性和女性对利用基于信仰的信息促进索马里女性进行乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4182-2.
7
Reducing Muslim Mammography Disparities: Outcomes From a Religiously Tailored Mosque-Based Intervention.减少穆斯林女性乳房 X 光检查差异:基于宗教定制的清真寺干预的结果。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Dec;45(6):1025-1035. doi: 10.1177/1090198118769371. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
A culturally informed model to enhance breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings: perspectives of American Indian adults and healthcare providers in rural New Mexico.一种增强乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的文化感知模型:新墨西哥州农村地区美国印第安成年人和医疗保健提供者的观点。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Oct;34(10):855-871. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01721-y. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
9
Effectiveness of breast cancer screening interventions in improving screening rates and preventive activities in Muslim refugee and immigrant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌筛查干预措施对提高穆斯林难民和移民妇女筛查率及预防活动的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):329-344. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12818. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
10
Receipt, uptake, and satisfaction with tailored DVD and patient navigation interventions to promote cancer screening among rural women.农村妇女癌症筛查中定制 DVD 和患者导航干预措施的接受、采用和满意度。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Dec 15;13(12):879-890. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad054.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of mistrust in digital health research and approaches to address them among Muslim ethnic minorities living in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study.英国穆斯林少数族裔对数字健康研究不信任的决定因素及解决方法:一项定性研究
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 15;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02583-3.
2
Enhancing Breast Cancer Screening Uptake: A Community-based Intervention in Southeast Wolverhampton, UK.提高乳腺癌筛查参与率:英国伍尔弗汉普顿东南部的一项社区干预措施。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 12;17(7):e87788. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87788. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Barriers and facilitators to accessing healthcare for early diagnosis of prostate cancer for black men-a qualitative exploration in North-East England and Scotland.黑人男性获得前列腺癌早期诊断医疗服务的障碍与促进因素——英格兰东北部和苏格兰的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):2454. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23650-y.
4
Sociocultural factors influencing women's adherence to colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review.影响女性坚持进行结直肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的社会文化因素:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):2034. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23118-z.
5
Exploring cervical cancer screening awareness, beliefs, barriers, and practices among indonesian muslim women in Japan: a qualitative study.探索在日本的印度尼西亚穆斯林女性对宫颈癌筛查的认知、观念、障碍及实践:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 21;25(1):1084. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22285-3.
6
Evaluation of a Faith-Placed Health Education Service on Bowel Cancer Screening in Mosques in East London.评估东伦敦清真寺中基于信仰的健康教育服务对肠癌筛查的影响。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e70006. doi: 10.1111/hex.70006.
7
Bridging the gap in cervical cancer screening for underserved communities: MCED and the promise of future technologies.弥合服务不足社区宫颈癌筛查的差距:分子癌症早检及未来技术的前景
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 29;14:1407008. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1407008. eCollection 2024.
8
Mosques and Public Health Promotion: A Scoping Review of Faith-Driven Health Interventions.清真寺与公共卫生促进:基于信仰的健康干预措施的范围综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2024 Oct;51(5):677-690. doi: 10.1177/10901981241252800. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
9
Stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland: a qualitative study.利益相关者对爱尔兰宫颈癌筛查可及性和参与度的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae072.
10
Overcoming barriers to cervical screening attendance among underrepresented populations in Europe.克服欧洲代表性不足人群进行宫颈癌筛查的障碍。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 May 16;42:100932. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100932. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a toolkit for increasing the participation of black, Asian and minority ethnic communities in health and social care research.开发一个工具包,以增加黑人和少数族裔社区参与健康和社会关怀研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01489-2.
2
Early assessment of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening services: The International Cancer Screening Network COVID-19 survey.早期评估 COVID-19 大流行对癌症筛查服务的影响:国际癌症筛查网络 COVID-19 调查。
Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106642. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106642. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
COVID-19 and cancer screening in Scotland: A national and coordinated approach to minimising harm.苏格兰的 COVID-19 和癌症筛查:一种将伤害最小化的全国性和协调方法。
Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106606. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106606. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
The integrated screening action model (I-SAM): A theory-based approach to inform intervention development.综合筛查行动模型(I-SAM):一种基于理论的干预措施制定方法。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 May 31;23:101427. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101427. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Experiences of cervical screening participation and non-participation in women from minority ethnic populations in Scotland.苏格兰少数族裔女性参与和不参与宫颈癌筛查的体验。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1459-1472. doi: 10.1111/hex.13287. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Are there ethnic and religious variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening? A retrospective cohort study among 1.7 million people in Scotland.肠癌筛查的接受情况是否存在种族和宗教差异?一项针对苏格兰170万人的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 7;10(10):e037011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037011.
7
Disparities in Cancer Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.新冠疫情时代的癌症预防差距。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Nov;13(11):893-896. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0447. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Why colorectal screening fails to achieve the uptake rates of breast and cervical cancer screening: a comparative qualitative study.为什么结直肠癌筛查未能达到乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的参与率:一项比较定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jun;29(6):482-490. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009998. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
9
Testing a Religiously Tailored Intervention with Somali American Muslim Women and Somali American Imams to Increase Participation in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening.针对索马里裔美国穆斯林妇女和索马里裔美国伊玛目进行宗教定制干预,以增加其参与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2020 Feb;22(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s10903-019-00881-x.
10
Changing Mammography-Related Beliefs Among American Muslim Women: Findings from a Religiously-Tailored Mosque-Based Intervention.改变美国穆斯林女性与乳房X光检查相关的观念:基于清真寺的宗教定制干预措施的研究结果。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2019 Dec;21(6):1325-1333. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-00851-9.