Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, 500078, India.
Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, 500078, India.
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 May 14;22(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00812-7.
Segmenting brain tumor and its constituent regions from magnetic resonance images (MRI) is important for planning diagnosis and treatment. In clinical routine often an experienced radiologist delineates the tumor regions using multimodal MRI. But this manual segmentation is prone to poor reproducibility and is time consuming. Also, routine clinical scans are usually of low resolution. To overcome these limitations an automated and precise segmentation algorithm based on computer vision is needed.
We investigated the performance of three widely used segmentation methods namely region growing, fuzzy C means and deep neural networks (deepmedic). We evaluated these algorithms on the BRATS 2018 dataset by choosing randomly 48 patients data (high grade, n = 24 and low grade, n = 24) and on our routine clinical MRI brain tumor dataset (high grade, n = 15 and low grade, n = 28). We measured their performance using dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance and volume measures.
Region growing method performed very poorly when compared to fuzzy C means (fcm) and deepmedic network. Dice similarity coefficient scores for FCM and deepmedic algorithms were close to each other for BRATS and clinical dataset. The accuracy was below 70% for both these methods in general.
Even though the deepmedic network showed very high accuracy in BRATS challenge for brain tumor segmentation, it has to be custom trained for the low resolution routine clinical scans. It also requires large training data to be used as a stand-alone algorithm for clinical applications. Nevertheless deepmedic may be a better algorithm for brain tumor segmentation when compared to region growing or FCM.
从磁共振图像 (MRI) 中分割脑肿瘤及其组成区域对于规划诊断和治疗非常重要。在临床常规中,通常由经验丰富的放射科医生使用多模态 MRI 来描绘肿瘤区域。但这种手动分割容易出现重现性差且耗时的问题。此外,常规临床扫描通常分辨率较低。为了克服这些限制,需要一种基于计算机视觉的自动化和精确分割算法。
我们研究了三种广泛使用的分割方法,即区域生长法、模糊 C 均值法和深度神经网络 (deepmedic) 的性能。我们通过随机选择 48 名患者的数据(高级别,n=24 名和低级别,n=24 名)以及我们的常规临床 MRI 脑肿瘤数据集(高级别,n=15 名和低级别,n=28 名)来评估这些算法。我们使用骰子相似系数、Hausdorff 距离和体积测量来衡量它们的性能。
与模糊 C 均值 (fcm) 和 deepmedic 网络相比,区域生长方法的性能非常差。FCM 和 deepmedic 算法的 BRATS 和临床数据集的骰子相似系数得分非常接近。对于这两种方法,准确率通常都低于 70%。
尽管 deepmedic 网络在 BRATS 挑战赛中对脑肿瘤分割表现出非常高的准确性,但它必须针对低分辨率的常规临床扫描进行定制训练。它还需要大量的训练数据才能作为独立算法用于临床应用。尽管如此,与区域生长法或 FCM 相比,deepmedic 可能是一种更好的脑肿瘤分割算法。