Suppr超能文献

对实物和现金家庭护理保险的偏好。

Preferences for in-kind and in-cash home care insurance.

机构信息

Tilburg Universiy, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg 5000 LE, the Netherlands.

Tilburg Universiy, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg 5000 LE, the Netherlands; Leiden University, P.O. Box 9520, Leiden 2300 RA, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2022 Jul;84:102626. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102626. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

Abstract

We study preferences for different types of home care insurance using a discrete choice experiment. We consider domestic, personal, and social care, a home care annuity, and a lump-sum for home adaptations. To understand variation in preferences, we relate willingness to pay to personal circumstances, preferences, and expectations. We find that the majority value in-kind and in-cash insurance above the actuarial premium. While most respondents value coverage for basic levels of support, we find diminishing marginal utility for higher levels of support. For in-kind care, willingness to pay is positively associated with respondent characteristics: being single, household income, home ownership, risk aversion, low bequest motives, expected length of home care use, expected expenditures when in need of care, and low expected availability of informal care. In contrast, in-cash support is valued regardless of respondent characteristics, possibly because its inherent flexibility. These results contribute to the design of insurance schemes for home care.

摘要

我们使用离散选择实验研究了人们对不同类型家庭护理保险的偏好。我们考虑了国内、个人和社会护理、家庭护理年金以及家庭适应的一次性付款。为了了解偏好的变化,我们将支付意愿与个人情况、偏好和期望联系起来。我们发现,大多数人愿意为保险支付高于精算保费的实物和现金。虽然大多数受访者都希望获得基本水平的支持,但我们发现,更高水平的支持的边际效用递减。对于实物护理,支付意愿与受访者的特征呈正相关:单身、家庭收入、房屋所有权、风险规避、低遗赠动机、预期家庭护理使用时间、需要护理时的预期支出以及低预期获得非正式护理。相比之下,现金支持无论受访者的特征如何都具有价值,这可能是因为其内在的灵活性。这些结果有助于家庭护理保险计划的设计。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验