Suppr超能文献

个体在恐惧习得方面的差异:不同情绪负性量表、生理反应、主观测量和神经激活的多变量分析。

Individual differences in fear acquisition: multivariate analyses of different emotional negativity scales, physiological responding, subjective measures, and neural activation.

机构信息

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 17;10(1):15283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72007-5.

Abstract

Negative emotionality is a well-established and stable risk factor for affective disorders. Individual differences in negative emotionality have been linked to associative learning processes which can be captured experimentally by computing CS-discrimination values in fear conditioning paradigms. Literature suffers from underpowered samples, suboptimal methods, and an isolated focus on single questionnaires and single outcome measures. First, the specific and shared variance across three commonly employed questionnaires [STAI-T, NEO-FFI-Neuroticism, Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) Scale] in relation to CS-discrimination during fear-acquisition in multiple analysis units (ratings, skin conductance, startle) is addressed (N = 356). A specific significant negative association between STAI-T and CS-discrimination in SCRs and between IU and CS-discrimination in startle responding was identified in multimodal and dimensional analyses, but also between latent factors negative emotionality and fear learning, which capture shared variance across questionnaires/scales and across outcome measures. Second, STAI-T was positively associated with CS-discrimination in a number of brain areas linked to conditioned fear (amygdala, putamen, thalamus), but not to SCRs or ratings (N = 113). Importantly, we replicate potential sampling biases between fMRI and behavioral studies regarding anxiety levels. Future studies are needed to target wide sampling distributions for STAI-T and verify whether current findings are generalizable to other samples.

摘要

负性情绪是情感障碍的一个既定且稳定的风险因素。个体间负性情绪的差异与联想学习过程有关,该过程可通过在恐惧条件反射范式中计算 CS 辨别值来进行实验捕获。文献中存在样本量不足、方法欠佳以及孤立地关注单一问卷和单一结果测量的问题。首先,在多个分析单元(评分、皮肤电导、惊跳反应)中,与恐惧获得过程中的 CS 辨别力相关的三个常用问卷(STAI-T、NEO-FFI-神经质、不确定容忍度量表)之间的特定和共享方差(N=356)被确定。在多模态和维度分析中,发现 STAI-T 与 SCR 中的 CS 辨别力以及 IU 与惊跳反应中的 CS 辨别力之间存在特定的负相关,同时也发现了潜在的神经质和恐惧学习因素之间存在特定的负相关,这些因素可以捕捉问卷/量表和结果测量之间的共享方差。其次,STAI-T 与与条件性恐惧相关的多个大脑区域(杏仁核、壳核、丘脑)中的 CS 辨别力呈正相关,但与 SCR 或评分无关(N=113)。重要的是,我们复制了 fMRI 和行为研究中关于焦虑水平的潜在抽样偏差。需要进一步的研究来针对 STAI-T 进行广泛的抽样分布,并验证当前的发现是否适用于其他样本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e47/7498611/c12ad67d9acb/41598_2020_72007_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验